Seven Years of SMOS Sea Surface Salinity at High Latitudes: Variability in Arctic and Sub-Arctic Regions

• Published in: Remote Sensing
• Main Authors: Olmedo, Estrella, Gabarró, Carolina, González Gambau, Verónica, Martínez, Justino, Ballabrera-Poy, Joaquim, Turiel, Antonio, Portabella, Marcos, Fournier, Séverine, Lee, Tong
• Other Authors: European Space Agency, Agencia Estatal de Investigación (España), Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (España), Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (España)
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: unknown
• Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2018
• Subjects: Remote sensing; Quality assessment; Data processing; Arctic rivers; SMOS; Arctic Ocean; Sea surface salinity; Arctic
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/172804; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10111772; https://doi.org/10.13039/501100003329; https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000844; https://doi.org/10.13039/501100011033

24 pages, 15 figures, 3 tables This paper aims to present and assess the quality of seven years (2011–2017) of 25 km nine-day Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) Sea Surface Salinity (SSS) objectively analyzed maps in the Arctic and sub-Arctic oceans ( 50∘ N– 90∘ N). The SMOS SSS maps presented in this work are an improved version of the preliminary three-year dataset generated and freely distributed by the Barcelona Expert Center. In this new version, a time-dependent bias correction has been applied to mitigate the seasonal bias that affected the previous SSS maps. An extensive database of in situ data (Argo floats and thermosalinograph measurements) has been used for assessing the accuracy of this product. The standard deviation of the difference between the new SMOS SSS maps and Argo SSS ranges from 0.25 and 0.35. The major features of the inter-annual SSS variations observed by the thermosalinographs are also captured by the SMOS SSS maps. However, the validation in some regions of the Arctic Ocean has not been feasible because of the lack of in situ data. In those regions, qualitative comparisons with SSS provided by models and the remotely sensed SSS provided by Aquarius and SMAP have been performed. Despite the differences between SMOS and SMAP, both datasets show consistent SSS variations with respect to the model and the river discharge in situ data, but present a larger dynamic range than that of the model. This result suggests that, in those regions, the use of the remotely sensed SSS may help to improve the models This work was supported by the Spanish R+D plan under projects L-BAND (ESP2017-89463-C3-1-R) and PROMISES (ESP2015-67549-C3-2) and from European Space Agency by means of the contracts SMOS ESL L2OS, CCI+ SSS and Arctic+ SSS Peer Reviewed