Can reducing the incoming energy flux over the Southern Ocean in a CGCM improve its simulation of tropical climate?

Atmosphere-ocean general circulation models (CGCMs) show important systematic errors. Simulated precipitation in the tropics is generally overestimated over the oceans south of the equator, and stratocumulus (SCu) clouds are underestimated above too warm sea surface temperatures (SSTs). In the extra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical Research Letters
Main Authors: Mechoso, Carlos R., Losada, Teresa, Koseki, S., Mohino, Elsa, Keenlyside, N., Castaño-Tierno, Antonio, Myers, T. A., Rodríguez-Fonseca, Belén, Toniazzo, T.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: John Wiley & Sons 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/141534
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071150
id ftcsic:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/141534
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcsic:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/141534 2024-02-11T10:08:47+01:00 Can reducing the incoming energy flux over the Southern Ocean in a CGCM improve its simulation of tropical climate? Mechoso, Carlos R. Losada, Teresa Koseki, S. Mohino, Elsa Keenlyside, N. Castaño-Tierno, Antonio Myers, T. A. Rodríguez-Fonseca, Belén Toniazzo, T. 2016-10-30 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/141534 https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071150 en eng John Wiley & Sons Publisher's version http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071150 Sí Geophysical Research Letters, 43(20): 11.057–11.063 (2016) 0094-8276 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/141534 doi:10.1002/2016GL071150 open GCMs ITCZ Low clouds artículo http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 2016 ftcsic https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071150 2024-01-16T10:19:22Z Atmosphere-ocean general circulation models (CGCMs) show important systematic errors. Simulated precipitation in the tropics is generally overestimated over the oceans south of the equator, and stratocumulus (SCu) clouds are underestimated above too warm sea surface temperatures (SSTs). In the extratropics, SSTs are also too warm over the Southern Ocean. We argue that ameliorating these extratropical errors in a CGCM can result in an improved model's performance in the tropics depending upon the success in simulating the sensitivity of SCu to underlying SST. Our arguments are supported by the very different response obtained with two CGCMs to an idealized reduction of solar radiation flux incident at the top of the atmosphere over the Southern Ocean. It is shown that local perturbation impacts are very similar in the two models but that SST reductions in the SCu regions of the southern subtropics are stronger in the model with the stronger SCu-SST feedbacks. NOAA's Climate Program Office, Climate Variability and Predictability Program Award. Grant Number: NA14OAR4310278. European Union Seventh Framework Programme. Grant Numbers: FP7/2007–2013, 60352 Peer reviewed Article in Journal/Newspaper Southern Ocean Digital.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council) Southern Ocean Geophysical Research Letters 43 20 11,057 11,063
institution Open Polar
collection Digital.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council)
op_collection_id ftcsic
language English
topic GCMs
ITCZ
Low clouds
spellingShingle GCMs
ITCZ
Low clouds
Mechoso, Carlos R.
Losada, Teresa
Koseki, S.
Mohino, Elsa
Keenlyside, N.
Castaño-Tierno, Antonio
Myers, T. A.
Rodríguez-Fonseca, Belén
Toniazzo, T.
Can reducing the incoming energy flux over the Southern Ocean in a CGCM improve its simulation of tropical climate?
topic_facet GCMs
ITCZ
Low clouds
description Atmosphere-ocean general circulation models (CGCMs) show important systematic errors. Simulated precipitation in the tropics is generally overestimated over the oceans south of the equator, and stratocumulus (SCu) clouds are underestimated above too warm sea surface temperatures (SSTs). In the extratropics, SSTs are also too warm over the Southern Ocean. We argue that ameliorating these extratropical errors in a CGCM can result in an improved model's performance in the tropics depending upon the success in simulating the sensitivity of SCu to underlying SST. Our arguments are supported by the very different response obtained with two CGCMs to an idealized reduction of solar radiation flux incident at the top of the atmosphere over the Southern Ocean. It is shown that local perturbation impacts are very similar in the two models but that SST reductions in the SCu regions of the southern subtropics are stronger in the model with the stronger SCu-SST feedbacks. NOAA's Climate Program Office, Climate Variability and Predictability Program Award. Grant Number: NA14OAR4310278. European Union Seventh Framework Programme. Grant Numbers: FP7/2007–2013, 60352 Peer reviewed
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Mechoso, Carlos R.
Losada, Teresa
Koseki, S.
Mohino, Elsa
Keenlyside, N.
Castaño-Tierno, Antonio
Myers, T. A.
Rodríguez-Fonseca, Belén
Toniazzo, T.
author_facet Mechoso, Carlos R.
Losada, Teresa
Koseki, S.
Mohino, Elsa
Keenlyside, N.
Castaño-Tierno, Antonio
Myers, T. A.
Rodríguez-Fonseca, Belén
Toniazzo, T.
author_sort Mechoso, Carlos R.
title Can reducing the incoming energy flux over the Southern Ocean in a CGCM improve its simulation of tropical climate?
title_short Can reducing the incoming energy flux over the Southern Ocean in a CGCM improve its simulation of tropical climate?
title_full Can reducing the incoming energy flux over the Southern Ocean in a CGCM improve its simulation of tropical climate?
title_fullStr Can reducing the incoming energy flux over the Southern Ocean in a CGCM improve its simulation of tropical climate?
title_full_unstemmed Can reducing the incoming energy flux over the Southern Ocean in a CGCM improve its simulation of tropical climate?
title_sort can reducing the incoming energy flux over the southern ocean in a cgcm improve its simulation of tropical climate?
publisher John Wiley & Sons
publishDate 2016
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/141534
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071150
geographic Southern Ocean
geographic_facet Southern Ocean
genre Southern Ocean
genre_facet Southern Ocean
op_relation Publisher's version
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071150

Geophysical Research Letters, 43(20): 11.057–11.063 (2016)
0094-8276
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/141534
doi:10.1002/2016GL071150
op_rights open
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071150
container_title Geophysical Research Letters
container_volume 43
container_issue 20
container_start_page 11,057
op_container_end_page 11,063
_version_ 1790608383308464128