Testing standard and nonstandard neutrino physics with cosmological data

Cosmological constraints on the sum of neutrino masses and on the effective number of neutrino species in standard and nonstandard scenarios are computed using the most recent available cosmological data. Our cosmological data sets include the measurement of the baryonic acoustic oscillation (BAO) f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physical Review D
Main Authors: Giusarma, Elena, Putter, Roland de, Mena, Olga
Other Authors: Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (España)
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/125604
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.043515
https://doi.org/10.13039/501100004837
id ftcsic:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/125604
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcsic:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/125604 2024-02-11T10:08:42+01:00 Testing standard and nonstandard neutrino physics with cosmological data Giusarma, Elena Putter, Roland de Mena, Olga Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (España) 2013-02-07 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/125604 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.043515 https://doi.org/10.13039/501100004837 en eng American Physical Society Preprint http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.043515 Sí Physical Review - Section D - Particles and Fields 87 (4): 043515 - 9 (2013) 1550-7998 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/125604 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.043515 1550-2368 http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004837 open Digital sky survey Baryon acoustic-oscillations Big-bang nucleosynthesis Data release Hubble constant Power spectrum Telescope Parameters artículo http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 2013 ftcsic https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.04351510.13039/501100004837 2024-01-16T10:12:10Z Cosmological constraints on the sum of neutrino masses and on the effective number of neutrino species in standard and nonstandard scenarios are computed using the most recent available cosmological data. Our cosmological data sets include the measurement of the baryonic acoustic oscillation (BAO) feature in the data release 9 CMASS sample of the baryon oscillation spectroscopic survey. We study in detail the different degeneracies among the parameters, as well as the impact of the different data sets used in the analyses. When considering bounds on the sum of the three active neutrino masses, the information in the BAO signal from galaxy clustering measurements is approximately equally powerful as the shape information from the matter power spectrum. The most stringent bound we find is Sigma m(nu) < 0.32 eV at 95% C.L. When nonstandard neutrino scenarios with N-eff massless or massive neutrino species are examined, power spectrum shape measurements provide slightly better bounds than the BAO signal only, due to the breaking of parameter degeneracies. Cosmic microwave background data from high multipoles from the South Pole Telescope turns out to be crucial for extracting the number of effective neutrino species. Recent baryon oscillation spectroscopic survey data combined with cosmic microwave background and Hubble Space Telescope measurements give N-eff = 3.66(-0.21-0.69)(+0.20+0.73) in the massless neutrino scenario, and similar results are obtained in the massive case. The evidence for extra radiation N-eff > 3 often claimed in the literature therefore remains at the 2 sigma level when considering up-to-date cosmological data sets. Measurements from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe combined with a prior on the Hubble parameter from the Hubble Space Telescope are very powerful in constraining either the sum of the three active neutrino masses or the number of massless neutrino species. If the former two parameters are allowed to freely vary, however, the bounds from the combination of these two ... Article in Journal/Newspaper South pole Digital.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council) Hubble ENVELOPE(158.317,158.317,-80.867,-80.867) South Pole Wilkinson ENVELOPE(-66.200,-66.200,-66.817,-66.817) Physical Review D 87 4
institution Open Polar
collection Digital.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council)
op_collection_id ftcsic
language English
topic Digital sky survey
Baryon acoustic-oscillations
Big-bang nucleosynthesis
Data release
Hubble constant
Power spectrum
Telescope
Parameters
spellingShingle Digital sky survey
Baryon acoustic-oscillations
Big-bang nucleosynthesis
Data release
Hubble constant
Power spectrum
Telescope
Parameters
Giusarma, Elena
Putter, Roland de
Mena, Olga
Testing standard and nonstandard neutrino physics with cosmological data
topic_facet Digital sky survey
Baryon acoustic-oscillations
Big-bang nucleosynthesis
Data release
Hubble constant
Power spectrum
Telescope
Parameters
description Cosmological constraints on the sum of neutrino masses and on the effective number of neutrino species in standard and nonstandard scenarios are computed using the most recent available cosmological data. Our cosmological data sets include the measurement of the baryonic acoustic oscillation (BAO) feature in the data release 9 CMASS sample of the baryon oscillation spectroscopic survey. We study in detail the different degeneracies among the parameters, as well as the impact of the different data sets used in the analyses. When considering bounds on the sum of the three active neutrino masses, the information in the BAO signal from galaxy clustering measurements is approximately equally powerful as the shape information from the matter power spectrum. The most stringent bound we find is Sigma m(nu) < 0.32 eV at 95% C.L. When nonstandard neutrino scenarios with N-eff massless or massive neutrino species are examined, power spectrum shape measurements provide slightly better bounds than the BAO signal only, due to the breaking of parameter degeneracies. Cosmic microwave background data from high multipoles from the South Pole Telescope turns out to be crucial for extracting the number of effective neutrino species. Recent baryon oscillation spectroscopic survey data combined with cosmic microwave background and Hubble Space Telescope measurements give N-eff = 3.66(-0.21-0.69)(+0.20+0.73) in the massless neutrino scenario, and similar results are obtained in the massive case. The evidence for extra radiation N-eff > 3 often claimed in the literature therefore remains at the 2 sigma level when considering up-to-date cosmological data sets. Measurements from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe combined with a prior on the Hubble parameter from the Hubble Space Telescope are very powerful in constraining either the sum of the three active neutrino masses or the number of massless neutrino species. If the former two parameters are allowed to freely vary, however, the bounds from the combination of these two ...
author2 Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (España)
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Giusarma, Elena
Putter, Roland de
Mena, Olga
author_facet Giusarma, Elena
Putter, Roland de
Mena, Olga
author_sort Giusarma, Elena
title Testing standard and nonstandard neutrino physics with cosmological data
title_short Testing standard and nonstandard neutrino physics with cosmological data
title_full Testing standard and nonstandard neutrino physics with cosmological data
title_fullStr Testing standard and nonstandard neutrino physics with cosmological data
title_full_unstemmed Testing standard and nonstandard neutrino physics with cosmological data
title_sort testing standard and nonstandard neutrino physics with cosmological data
publisher American Physical Society
publishDate 2013
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/125604
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.043515
https://doi.org/10.13039/501100004837
long_lat ENVELOPE(158.317,158.317,-80.867,-80.867)
ENVELOPE(-66.200,-66.200,-66.817,-66.817)
geographic Hubble
South Pole
Wilkinson
geographic_facet Hubble
South Pole
Wilkinson
genre South pole
genre_facet South pole
op_relation Preprint
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.043515

Physical Review - Section D - Particles and Fields 87 (4): 043515 - 9 (2013)
1550-7998
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/125604
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.043515
1550-2368
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004837
op_rights open
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.04351510.13039/501100004837
container_title Physical Review D
container_volume 87
container_issue 4
_version_ 1790608263428964352