Domestic livestock and rewilding: Are they mutually exclusive?

Human influence extends across the globe, from the tallest mountains to the deep bottom of the oceans. There is a growing call for nature to be protected from the negative impacts of human activity (particularly intensive agriculture); so-called “land sparing”. A relatively new approach is “rewildin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Iain Gordon, Adrian D Manning, Laetitia M Navarro, Julia Rouet-Leduc
Format: Other Non-Article Part of Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10779/cqu.16746352.v1
id ftcquniportalfig:oai:figshare.com:article/16746352
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcquniportalfig:oai:figshare.com:article/16746352 2023-05-15T16:17:06+02:00 Domestic livestock and rewilding: Are they mutually exclusive? Iain Gordon Adrian D Manning Laetitia M Navarro Julia Rouet-Leduc 2021-03-18T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/10779/cqu.16746352.v1 unknown https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Domestic_livestock_and_rewilding_Are_they_mutually_exclusive_/16746352 http://hdl.handle.net/10779/cqu.16746352.v1 CC BY 4.0 CC-BY Ecology not elsewhere classified Rewilding Livestock Oostvaardersplassen nature reserve Conservation Safe operating space First Nations Ecosystems services Text Journal contribution 2021 ftcquniportalfig 2022-08-05T11:54:45Z Human influence extends across the globe, from the tallest mountains to the deep bottom of the oceans. There is a growing call for nature to be protected from the negative impacts of human activity (particularly intensive agriculture); so-called “land sparing”. A relatively new approach is “rewilding”, defined as the restoration of self-sustaining and complex ecosystems, with interlinked ecological processes that promote and support one another while minimising or gradually reducing human intervention. The key theoretical basis of rewilding is to return ecosystems to a “natural” or “self-willed” state with trophic complexity, dispersal (and connectivity) and stochastic disturbance in place. However, this is constrained by context-specific factors whereby it may not be possible to restore the native species that formed part of the trophic structure of the ecosystem if they are extinct (e.g., mammoths, Mammuthus spp., aurochs, Bos primigenius); and, populations/communities of native herbivores/predators may not be able to survive or be acceptable to the public in small scale rewilding projects close to areas of high human density. Therefore, the restoration of natural trophic complexity and disturbance regimes within rewilding projects requires careful consideration if the broader conservation needs of society are to be met. In some circumstances, managers will require a more flexible deliberate approach to intervening in rewilding projects using the range of tools in their toolbox (e.g., controlled burning regimes; using domestic livestock to replicate the impacts of extinct herbivore species), even if this is only in the early stages of the rewilding process. If this approach is adopted, then larger areas can be given over to conservation, because of the potential broader benefits to society from these spaces and the engagement of farmers in practises that are closer to their traditions. We provide examples, primarily European, where domestic and semi-domestic livestock are used by managers as part of their ... Other Non-Article Part of Journal/Newspaper First Nations CQUniversity: acquire
institution Open Polar
collection CQUniversity: acquire
op_collection_id ftcquniportalfig
language unknown
topic Ecology not elsewhere classified
Rewilding
Livestock
Oostvaardersplassen nature reserve
Conservation
Safe operating space
First Nations
Ecosystems services
spellingShingle Ecology not elsewhere classified
Rewilding
Livestock
Oostvaardersplassen nature reserve
Conservation
Safe operating space
First Nations
Ecosystems services
Iain Gordon
Adrian D Manning
Laetitia M Navarro
Julia Rouet-Leduc
Domestic livestock and rewilding: Are they mutually exclusive?
topic_facet Ecology not elsewhere classified
Rewilding
Livestock
Oostvaardersplassen nature reserve
Conservation
Safe operating space
First Nations
Ecosystems services
description Human influence extends across the globe, from the tallest mountains to the deep bottom of the oceans. There is a growing call for nature to be protected from the negative impacts of human activity (particularly intensive agriculture); so-called “land sparing”. A relatively new approach is “rewilding”, defined as the restoration of self-sustaining and complex ecosystems, with interlinked ecological processes that promote and support one another while minimising or gradually reducing human intervention. The key theoretical basis of rewilding is to return ecosystems to a “natural” or “self-willed” state with trophic complexity, dispersal (and connectivity) and stochastic disturbance in place. However, this is constrained by context-specific factors whereby it may not be possible to restore the native species that formed part of the trophic structure of the ecosystem if they are extinct (e.g., mammoths, Mammuthus spp., aurochs, Bos primigenius); and, populations/communities of native herbivores/predators may not be able to survive or be acceptable to the public in small scale rewilding projects close to areas of high human density. Therefore, the restoration of natural trophic complexity and disturbance regimes within rewilding projects requires careful consideration if the broader conservation needs of society are to be met. In some circumstances, managers will require a more flexible deliberate approach to intervening in rewilding projects using the range of tools in their toolbox (e.g., controlled burning regimes; using domestic livestock to replicate the impacts of extinct herbivore species), even if this is only in the early stages of the rewilding process. If this approach is adopted, then larger areas can be given over to conservation, because of the potential broader benefits to society from these spaces and the engagement of farmers in practises that are closer to their traditions. We provide examples, primarily European, where domestic and semi-domestic livestock are used by managers as part of their ...
format Other Non-Article Part of Journal/Newspaper
author Iain Gordon
Adrian D Manning
Laetitia M Navarro
Julia Rouet-Leduc
author_facet Iain Gordon
Adrian D Manning
Laetitia M Navarro
Julia Rouet-Leduc
author_sort Iain Gordon
title Domestic livestock and rewilding: Are they mutually exclusive?
title_short Domestic livestock and rewilding: Are they mutually exclusive?
title_full Domestic livestock and rewilding: Are they mutually exclusive?
title_fullStr Domestic livestock and rewilding: Are they mutually exclusive?
title_full_unstemmed Domestic livestock and rewilding: Are they mutually exclusive?
title_sort domestic livestock and rewilding: are they mutually exclusive?
publishDate 2021
url http://hdl.handle.net/10779/cqu.16746352.v1
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_relation https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Domestic_livestock_and_rewilding_Are_they_mutually_exclusive_/16746352
http://hdl.handle.net/10779/cqu.16746352.v1
op_rights CC BY 4.0
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
_version_ 1766002952560967680