Copper distribution in a river system that receives coal mine-affected water releases in the Fitzroy River Basin, Central QLD

• Main Authors: Catherine Jones, Victoria Vicente-Beckett, James Chapman, WW Bennett
• Format: Conference Object
• Language: unknown
• Published: 2016
• Subjects: Environmental Chemistry (incl. Atmospheric Chemistry); Environmental Analysis And Monitoring; Coal Mining; Fitzroy River Basin; Copper; Fitzroy; Mackenzie River; Queensland; Mackenzie Basin; Mackenzie river
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/10018/1212120

The Mackenzie River sub-basin in the Fitzroy Basin (Central Queensland) is a turbid river system associated with significant coal mining. Coal mine-affected water (CMAW) releases do not occur during low flow conditions. Copper (Cu) is one of the heavy metals found in CMAW. The median annual dissolved Cu concentrations in the Mackenzie basin during low flow conditions in 2010-2014, calculated from data reported by the Fitzroy Partnership for River Health, were 3.0, 2.0, 1.5 and 1.2 µg/L (n = 43–264), respectively, with concentrations for 3 years being greater than the ANZECC (2000) toxicant trigger value for Cu (1.4 µg/L) for slightly-moderately disturbed freshwater systems. This study sought to determine the potential bioavailability and the distribution of Cu in the Mackenzie River environment. Two field trips were conducted: sediment core samples were taken in August 2014 and water samples in March 2015, both during low flow conditions and no recent CMAW releases. Three sites were sampled: one, in an upstream tributary, where no coal mining activity existed (called “Ref” site), and two downstream Mackenzie River sites (Site 5b and Site 6), that could receive cumulative mine-affected water releases, from numerous upstream coal mines. DGT-labile Cu (using DGT devices), total dissolved Cu (grab water samples filtered through 0.45µm at the site) and Cu in suspended particulate matter (retained on large diameter 0.45 µm filters, in field) were measured at each site. Triplicate DGT samplers were deployed for 48 h, and triplicate grab water samples were taken during deployment and retrieval of the DGT devices at each site. There was no significant difference in the total dissolved Cu concentration at deployment vs at retrieval at the Ref site and at Site 6 (furthest downstream). The average dissolved Cu concentration over 48 h at these two sites were 0.91 ±0.10 µg/L and 1.6 ±0.26 µg/L, respectively. In contrast a significant difference in the Cu concentration at deployment vs at retrieval was observed at Site 5b (2.1 ...