Data from: High-latitude stratospheric aerosol geoengineering may be more effective if injection is limited to spring

Stratospheric aerosol geoengineering focused on the Arctic could substantially reduce local and worldwide impacts of anthropogenic global warming. Because the Arctic receives little sunlight during the winter, stratospheric aerosols present in the winter at high latitudes have little impact on the c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lee, Walker Raymond, MacMartin, Douglas G., Visioni, Daniele, Kravitz, Ben
Format: Dataset
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1813/103632
https://doi.org/10.7298/d557-db75
id ftcornelluniv:oai:ecommons.cornell.edu:1813/103632
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcornelluniv:oai:ecommons.cornell.edu:1813/103632 2024-10-29T17:44:03+00:00 Data from: High-latitude stratospheric aerosol geoengineering may be more effective if injection is limited to spring Lee, Walker Raymond MacMartin, Douglas G. Visioni, Daniele Kravitz, Ben 2021-05-05 text/plain application/zip https://hdl.handle.net/1813/103632 https://doi.org/10.7298/d557-db75 en_US eng Lee, W. R., MacMartin, D. G., Visioni, D., & Kravitz, B. (2021). High‐latitude stratospheric aerosol geoengineering can be more effective if injection is limited to spring. Geophysical Research Letters, 48, e2021GL092696. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL092696 https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL092696 https://hdl.handle.net/1813/103632 Attribution 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ geoengineering climate engineering Arctic geoengineering stratospheric aerosol injection climate modeling dataset 2021 ftcornelluniv https://doi.org/10.7298/d557-db7510.1029/2021GL092696 2024-09-30T15:37:27Z Stratospheric aerosol geoengineering focused on the Arctic could substantially reduce local and worldwide impacts of anthropogenic global warming. Because the Arctic receives little sunlight during the winter, stratospheric aerosols present in the winter at high latitudes have little impact on the climate, whereas stratospheric aerosols present during the summer achieve larger changes in radiative forcing. Injecting SO2 in the spring leads to peak aerosol optical depth (AOD) in the summer. The data presented here contains the results of our simulations, in which we demonstrate that spring injection produces approximately twice as much summer AOD as year-round injection and restores approximately twice as much September sea ice, resulting in less increase in stratospheric sulfur burden, stratospheric heating, and stratospheric ozone depletion per unit of sea ice restored. We also find that differences in AOD between different seasonal injection strategies are small compared to the difference between annual and spring injection. We would like to acknowledge high‐performance computing support from Cheyenne (doi:10.5065/D6RX99HX) provided by NCAR's Computational and Information Systems Laboratory, sponsored by the National Science Foundation. Support for WL and DM was provided by the National Science Foundation through agreement CBET‐1818759. Support for DV was provided by the Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future at Cornell University. Support for BK was provided in part by the National Sciences Foundation through agreement CBET-1931641, the Indiana University Environmental Resilience Institute, and the Prepared for Environmental Change Grand Challenge initiative. The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is operated for the U.S. Department of Energy by Battelle Memorial Institute under contract DE‐AC05‐76RL01830. The CESM project is supported primarily by the National Science Foundation. This work was supported by the National Center for Atmospheric Research, which is a major facility sponsored by the ... Dataset Global warming Sea ice Cornell University: eCommons@Cornell Arctic Atkinson ENVELOPE(-85.483,-85.483,-78.650,-78.650) Pacific
institution Open Polar
collection Cornell University: eCommons@Cornell
op_collection_id ftcornelluniv
language English
topic geoengineering
climate engineering
Arctic geoengineering
stratospheric aerosol injection
climate modeling
spellingShingle geoengineering
climate engineering
Arctic geoengineering
stratospheric aerosol injection
climate modeling
Lee, Walker Raymond
MacMartin, Douglas G.
Visioni, Daniele
Kravitz, Ben
Data from: High-latitude stratospheric aerosol geoengineering may be more effective if injection is limited to spring
topic_facet geoengineering
climate engineering
Arctic geoengineering
stratospheric aerosol injection
climate modeling
description Stratospheric aerosol geoengineering focused on the Arctic could substantially reduce local and worldwide impacts of anthropogenic global warming. Because the Arctic receives little sunlight during the winter, stratospheric aerosols present in the winter at high latitudes have little impact on the climate, whereas stratospheric aerosols present during the summer achieve larger changes in radiative forcing. Injecting SO2 in the spring leads to peak aerosol optical depth (AOD) in the summer. The data presented here contains the results of our simulations, in which we demonstrate that spring injection produces approximately twice as much summer AOD as year-round injection and restores approximately twice as much September sea ice, resulting in less increase in stratospheric sulfur burden, stratospheric heating, and stratospheric ozone depletion per unit of sea ice restored. We also find that differences in AOD between different seasonal injection strategies are small compared to the difference between annual and spring injection. We would like to acknowledge high‐performance computing support from Cheyenne (doi:10.5065/D6RX99HX) provided by NCAR's Computational and Information Systems Laboratory, sponsored by the National Science Foundation. Support for WL and DM was provided by the National Science Foundation through agreement CBET‐1818759. Support for DV was provided by the Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future at Cornell University. Support for BK was provided in part by the National Sciences Foundation through agreement CBET-1931641, the Indiana University Environmental Resilience Institute, and the Prepared for Environmental Change Grand Challenge initiative. The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is operated for the U.S. Department of Energy by Battelle Memorial Institute under contract DE‐AC05‐76RL01830. The CESM project is supported primarily by the National Science Foundation. This work was supported by the National Center for Atmospheric Research, which is a major facility sponsored by the ...
format Dataset
author Lee, Walker Raymond
MacMartin, Douglas G.
Visioni, Daniele
Kravitz, Ben
author_facet Lee, Walker Raymond
MacMartin, Douglas G.
Visioni, Daniele
Kravitz, Ben
author_sort Lee, Walker Raymond
title Data from: High-latitude stratospheric aerosol geoengineering may be more effective if injection is limited to spring
title_short Data from: High-latitude stratospheric aerosol geoengineering may be more effective if injection is limited to spring
title_full Data from: High-latitude stratospheric aerosol geoengineering may be more effective if injection is limited to spring
title_fullStr Data from: High-latitude stratospheric aerosol geoengineering may be more effective if injection is limited to spring
title_full_unstemmed Data from: High-latitude stratospheric aerosol geoengineering may be more effective if injection is limited to spring
title_sort data from: high-latitude stratospheric aerosol geoengineering may be more effective if injection is limited to spring
publishDate 2021
url https://hdl.handle.net/1813/103632
https://doi.org/10.7298/d557-db75
long_lat ENVELOPE(-85.483,-85.483,-78.650,-78.650)
geographic Arctic
Atkinson
Pacific
geographic_facet Arctic
Atkinson
Pacific
genre Global warming
Sea ice
genre_facet Global warming
Sea ice
op_relation Lee, W. R., MacMartin, D. G., Visioni, D., & Kravitz, B. (2021). High‐latitude stratospheric aerosol geoengineering can be more effective if injection is limited to spring. Geophysical Research Letters, 48, e2021GL092696. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL092696
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL092696
https://hdl.handle.net/1813/103632
op_rights Attribution 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7298/d557-db7510.1029/2021GL092696
_version_ 1814273237210628096