Stationary Waves and Upward Troposphere-Stratosphere Coupling in S2S Models

The simulated Northern Hemisphere stationary wave (SW) field is investigated in 11 subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) models. It is shown that while most models considered can well-simulate the stationary wavenumbers 1 and 2 during the first two weeks of integration, they diverge from observations follow...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Schwartz, Chen, Garfinkel, Chaim I., Yadav, Priyanka, Chen, Wen, Domeisen, Daniela
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2021-58
https://wcd.copernicus.org/preprints/wcd-2021-58/
_version_ 1821650940392898560
author Schwartz, Chen
Garfinkel, Chaim I.
Yadav, Priyanka
Chen, Wen
Domeisen, Daniela
author_facet Schwartz, Chen
Garfinkel, Chaim I.
Yadav, Priyanka
Chen, Wen
Domeisen, Daniela
author_sort Schwartz, Chen
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
description The simulated Northern Hemisphere stationary wave (SW) field is investigated in 11 subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) models. It is shown that while most models considered can well-simulate the stationary wavenumbers 1 and 2 during the first two weeks of integration, they diverge from observations following week 3. Those models with a poor resolution in the stratosphere struggle to simulate the waves, both in the troposphere and the stratosphere, even during the first two weeks, and biases extend from the troposphere all the way up to the stratosphere. Focusing on the tropospheric regions where SWs peak in amplitude reveals that the models generally do a better job in simulating the Northwest Pacific stationary trough, while certain models struggle to simulate the stationary ridges both in Western North America and the North Atlantic. In addition, a strong relationship is found between regional biases in the stationary height field and model errors in simulated upward propagation of planetary waves into the stratosphere. In the stratosphere, biases mostly are in wave-2 in those models with high stratospheric resolution, whereas in those models with low resolution in the stratosphere, a wave-1 bias is evident, which leads to a strong bias in the stratospheric mean zonal circulation due to the predominance of wave-1 there. Finally, biases in both amplitude and location of mean tropical convection and the subsequent subtropical downwelling, are identified as possible contributors to biases in the regional SW field in the troposphere.
format Text
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
geographic Pacific
geographic_facet Pacific
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:wcdd97465
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2021-58
op_relation doi:10.5194/wcd-2021-58
https://wcd.copernicus.org/preprints/wcd-2021-58/
op_source eISSN: 2698-4016
publishDate 2021
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:wcdd97465 2025-01-16T23:42:15+00:00 Stationary Waves and Upward Troposphere-Stratosphere Coupling in S2S Models Schwartz, Chen Garfinkel, Chaim I. Yadav, Priyanka Chen, Wen Domeisen, Daniela 2021-09-09 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2021-58 https://wcd.copernicus.org/preprints/wcd-2021-58/ eng eng doi:10.5194/wcd-2021-58 https://wcd.copernicus.org/preprints/wcd-2021-58/ eISSN: 2698-4016 Text 2021 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2021-58 2021-09-13T16:22:27Z The simulated Northern Hemisphere stationary wave (SW) field is investigated in 11 subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) models. It is shown that while most models considered can well-simulate the stationary wavenumbers 1 and 2 during the first two weeks of integration, they diverge from observations following week 3. Those models with a poor resolution in the stratosphere struggle to simulate the waves, both in the troposphere and the stratosphere, even during the first two weeks, and biases extend from the troposphere all the way up to the stratosphere. Focusing on the tropospheric regions where SWs peak in amplitude reveals that the models generally do a better job in simulating the Northwest Pacific stationary trough, while certain models struggle to simulate the stationary ridges both in Western North America and the North Atlantic. In addition, a strong relationship is found between regional biases in the stationary height field and model errors in simulated upward propagation of planetary waves into the stratosphere. In the stratosphere, biases mostly are in wave-2 in those models with high stratospheric resolution, whereas in those models with low resolution in the stratosphere, a wave-1 bias is evident, which leads to a strong bias in the stratospheric mean zonal circulation due to the predominance of wave-1 there. Finally, biases in both amplitude and location of mean tropical convection and the subsequent subtropical downwelling, are identified as possible contributors to biases in the regional SW field in the troposphere. Text North Atlantic Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Pacific
spellingShingle Schwartz, Chen
Garfinkel, Chaim I.
Yadav, Priyanka
Chen, Wen
Domeisen, Daniela
Stationary Waves and Upward Troposphere-Stratosphere Coupling in S2S Models
title Stationary Waves and Upward Troposphere-Stratosphere Coupling in S2S Models
title_full Stationary Waves and Upward Troposphere-Stratosphere Coupling in S2S Models
title_fullStr Stationary Waves and Upward Troposphere-Stratosphere Coupling in S2S Models
title_full_unstemmed Stationary Waves and Upward Troposphere-Stratosphere Coupling in S2S Models
title_short Stationary Waves and Upward Troposphere-Stratosphere Coupling in S2S Models
title_sort stationary waves and upward troposphere-stratosphere coupling in s2s models
url https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2021-58
https://wcd.copernicus.org/preprints/wcd-2021-58/