Comparison of ice dynamics using full-Stokes and Blatter-Pattynapproximation: application to the central North East Greenland IceStream

Full-Stokes (FS) ice sheet models provide the most sophisticated formulation of ice sheet flow. However, its applicability is often limited due to its high computational demand and its owing numerical challenges. To balance computational demand and accuracy, the so-called Blatter-Pattyn (BP) stress...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rückamp, Martin, Kleiner, Thomas, Humbert, Angelika
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-193
https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2021-193/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:tcd95744
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:tcd95744 2023-05-15T16:03:39+02:00 Comparison of ice dynamics using full-Stokes and Blatter-Pattynapproximation: application to the central North East Greenland IceStream Rückamp, Martin Kleiner, Thomas Humbert, Angelika 2021-07-16 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-193 https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2021-193/ eng eng doi:10.5194/tc-2021-193 https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2021-193/ eISSN: 1994-0424 Text 2021 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-193 2021-07-19T16:22:26Z Full-Stokes (FS) ice sheet models provide the most sophisticated formulation of ice sheet flow. However, its applicability is often limited due to its high computational demand and its owing numerical challenges. To balance computational demand and accuracy, the so-called Blatter-Pattyn (BP) stress regime is frequently used. Here, we explore the dynamic consequences caused by solving FS and the BP stress regime applied to the central part of the North East Greenland Ice Stream (NEGIS). To ensure a consistent comparison, we use one single ice sheet model to run the simulations under identical numerical conditions. A sensitivity study to grid resolution reveals that velocity differences between the FS and BP solution emerge below ~1 km horizontal resolution and continuously increases with resolution. Generally, BP produces higher surface velocities than FS, at a resolution of 0.1 km up to 5.8 % on average. In an extreme case, estimated ice discharge rates are up to 8 % overestimated by BP; in a rather classical case, BP reveals up to 3 % more ice discharge. Based on these minor model disagreements and given other large uncertainties in ice sheet projections, we conclude that the use of FS seems not an urgent issue and takes a secondary role in narrowing uncertainties of current sea-level projections. However, the englacial advection schemes from both stress regimes indicate severe impacts on internal layers of ice sheets. Text East Greenland Greenland Ice Sheet Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Greenland
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description Full-Stokes (FS) ice sheet models provide the most sophisticated formulation of ice sheet flow. However, its applicability is often limited due to its high computational demand and its owing numerical challenges. To balance computational demand and accuracy, the so-called Blatter-Pattyn (BP) stress regime is frequently used. Here, we explore the dynamic consequences caused by solving FS and the BP stress regime applied to the central part of the North East Greenland Ice Stream (NEGIS). To ensure a consistent comparison, we use one single ice sheet model to run the simulations under identical numerical conditions. A sensitivity study to grid resolution reveals that velocity differences between the FS and BP solution emerge below ~1 km horizontal resolution and continuously increases with resolution. Generally, BP produces higher surface velocities than FS, at a resolution of 0.1 km up to 5.8 % on average. In an extreme case, estimated ice discharge rates are up to 8 % overestimated by BP; in a rather classical case, BP reveals up to 3 % more ice discharge. Based on these minor model disagreements and given other large uncertainties in ice sheet projections, we conclude that the use of FS seems not an urgent issue and takes a secondary role in narrowing uncertainties of current sea-level projections. However, the englacial advection schemes from both stress regimes indicate severe impacts on internal layers of ice sheets.
format Text
author Rückamp, Martin
Kleiner, Thomas
Humbert, Angelika
spellingShingle Rückamp, Martin
Kleiner, Thomas
Humbert, Angelika
Comparison of ice dynamics using full-Stokes and Blatter-Pattynapproximation: application to the central North East Greenland IceStream
author_facet Rückamp, Martin
Kleiner, Thomas
Humbert, Angelika
author_sort Rückamp, Martin
title Comparison of ice dynamics using full-Stokes and Blatter-Pattynapproximation: application to the central North East Greenland IceStream
title_short Comparison of ice dynamics using full-Stokes and Blatter-Pattynapproximation: application to the central North East Greenland IceStream
title_full Comparison of ice dynamics using full-Stokes and Blatter-Pattynapproximation: application to the central North East Greenland IceStream
title_fullStr Comparison of ice dynamics using full-Stokes and Blatter-Pattynapproximation: application to the central North East Greenland IceStream
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of ice dynamics using full-Stokes and Blatter-Pattynapproximation: application to the central North East Greenland IceStream
title_sort comparison of ice dynamics using full-stokes and blatter-pattynapproximation: application to the central north east greenland icestream
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-193
https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2021-193/
geographic Greenland
geographic_facet Greenland
genre East Greenland
Greenland
Ice Sheet
genre_facet East Greenland
Greenland
Ice Sheet
op_source eISSN: 1994-0424
op_relation doi:10.5194/tc-2021-193
https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2021-193/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-193
_version_ 1766399354993639424