Sources of Uncertainty in Greenland Surface Mass Balance in the 21st century

The surface mass balance (SMB) of the Greenland Ice Sheet is subject to considerable uncertainties that complicate predictions of sea level rise caused by climate change. We examine the SMB of the Greenland Ice Sheet in the 21 st century with the surface energy and mass balance model BESSI. To estim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Holube, Katharina M., Zolles, Tobias, Born, Andreas
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-128
https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2021-128/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:tcd94309
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:tcd94309 2023-05-15T16:26:55+02:00 Sources of Uncertainty in Greenland Surface Mass Balance in the 21st century Holube, Katharina M. Zolles, Tobias Born, Andreas 2021-05-18 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-128 https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2021-128/ eng eng doi:10.5194/tc-2021-128 https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2021-128/ eISSN: 1994-0424 Text 2021 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-128 2021-05-24T16:22:15Z The surface mass balance (SMB) of the Greenland Ice Sheet is subject to considerable uncertainties that complicate predictions of sea level rise caused by climate change. We examine the SMB of the Greenland Ice Sheet in the 21 st century with the surface energy and mass balance model BESSI. To estimate the uncertainty of the SMB, we conduct simulations for four greenhouse gas emission scenarios using the output of a wide range of climate models from the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) to force BESSI. In addition, the uncertainty of the SMB simulation is estimated by using 16 different parameter sets in our SMB model. The median SMB across climate models and parameter sets, integrated over the ice sheet, decreases over time for every emission scenario. As expected, the decrease in SMB is stronger for higher greenhouse gas emissions. The regional distribution of the resulting SMB shows the most substantial SMB decrease in western Greenland for all climate models, whereas the differences between the climate models are most pronounced in the north and in the area around the equilibrium line. Temperature and precipitation are the input variables of the snow model that have the largest influence on the SMB and the largest differences between climate models. In our ensemble, the range of uncertainty in the SMB is greater than in other studies that used fewer climate models as forcing. An analysis of the different sources of uncertainty shows that the uncertainty caused by the different climate models for a given scenario is larger than the uncertainty caused by the climate scenarios. In comparison, the uncertainty caused by the snow model parameters is negligible, leaving the uncertainty of the climate models as the main reason for SMB uncertainty. Text Greenland Ice Sheet Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Greenland
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description The surface mass balance (SMB) of the Greenland Ice Sheet is subject to considerable uncertainties that complicate predictions of sea level rise caused by climate change. We examine the SMB of the Greenland Ice Sheet in the 21 st century with the surface energy and mass balance model BESSI. To estimate the uncertainty of the SMB, we conduct simulations for four greenhouse gas emission scenarios using the output of a wide range of climate models from the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) to force BESSI. In addition, the uncertainty of the SMB simulation is estimated by using 16 different parameter sets in our SMB model. The median SMB across climate models and parameter sets, integrated over the ice sheet, decreases over time for every emission scenario. As expected, the decrease in SMB is stronger for higher greenhouse gas emissions. The regional distribution of the resulting SMB shows the most substantial SMB decrease in western Greenland for all climate models, whereas the differences between the climate models are most pronounced in the north and in the area around the equilibrium line. Temperature and precipitation are the input variables of the snow model that have the largest influence on the SMB and the largest differences between climate models. In our ensemble, the range of uncertainty in the SMB is greater than in other studies that used fewer climate models as forcing. An analysis of the different sources of uncertainty shows that the uncertainty caused by the different climate models for a given scenario is larger than the uncertainty caused by the climate scenarios. In comparison, the uncertainty caused by the snow model parameters is negligible, leaving the uncertainty of the climate models as the main reason for SMB uncertainty.
format Text
author Holube, Katharina M.
Zolles, Tobias
Born, Andreas
spellingShingle Holube, Katharina M.
Zolles, Tobias
Born, Andreas
Sources of Uncertainty in Greenland Surface Mass Balance in the 21st century
author_facet Holube, Katharina M.
Zolles, Tobias
Born, Andreas
author_sort Holube, Katharina M.
title Sources of Uncertainty in Greenland Surface Mass Balance in the 21st century
title_short Sources of Uncertainty in Greenland Surface Mass Balance in the 21st century
title_full Sources of Uncertainty in Greenland Surface Mass Balance in the 21st century
title_fullStr Sources of Uncertainty in Greenland Surface Mass Balance in the 21st century
title_full_unstemmed Sources of Uncertainty in Greenland Surface Mass Balance in the 21st century
title_sort sources of uncertainty in greenland surface mass balance in the 21st century
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-128
https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2021-128/
geographic Greenland
geographic_facet Greenland
genre Greenland
Ice Sheet
genre_facet Greenland
Ice Sheet
op_source eISSN: 1994-0424
op_relation doi:10.5194/tc-2021-128
https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2021-128/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-128
_version_ 1766015940415193088