Evaluating permafrost physics in the CMIP6 models and their sensitivity to climate change

Permafrost is an important component of the Arctic system and its future fate is likely to control changes in northern high latitude hydrology and biogeochemistry. Here we evaluate the permafrost dynamics in the global models participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (present genera...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Burke, Eleanor J., Zhang, Yu, Krinner, Gerhard
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2019-309
https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2019-309/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:tcd82398
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:tcd82398 2023-05-15T15:11:09+02:00 Evaluating permafrost physics in the CMIP6 models and their sensitivity to climate change Burke, Eleanor J. Zhang, Yu Krinner, Gerhard 2020-02-07 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2019-309 https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2019-309/ eng eng doi:10.5194/tc-2019-309 https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2019-309/ eISSN: 1994-0424 Text 2020 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2019-309 2020-07-20T16:22:26Z Permafrost is an important component of the Arctic system and its future fate is likely to control changes in northern high latitude hydrology and biogeochemistry. Here we evaluate the permafrost dynamics in the global models participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (present generation – CMIP6; previous generation – CMIP5) along with the the sensitivity of permafrost to climate change. Whilst the northern high latitude air temperatures are relatively well simulated by the climate models, they do introduce a bias into any subsequent model estimate of permafrost. Therefore evaluation metrics are defined in relation to the air temperature. This paper shows the climate, snow and permafrost physics of the CMIP6 multi-model ensemble is very similar to that of the CMIP5 multi-model ensemble. The main difference is that a small number of models have demonstrably better snow insulation in CMIP6 than in CMIP5 which improves their representation of the permafrost extent. The simulation of maximum summer thaw depth does not improve between CMIP5 and CMIP6. We suggest that models should include a better resolved and deeper soil profile as a first step towards addressing this. We use the annual mean thawed volume of the top 2 m of the soil defined from the model soil profiles for the permafrost region to quantify changes in permafrost dynamics. The CMIP6 models suggest this is projected to increase by 20–30 %/°C of global mean temperature increase. Under climate change and in equilibrium this may result in an additional 80–120 Gt C/°C of permafrost carbon becoming vulnerable to decomposition. Text Arctic Climate change permafrost Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description Permafrost is an important component of the Arctic system and its future fate is likely to control changes in northern high latitude hydrology and biogeochemistry. Here we evaluate the permafrost dynamics in the global models participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (present generation – CMIP6; previous generation – CMIP5) along with the the sensitivity of permafrost to climate change. Whilst the northern high latitude air temperatures are relatively well simulated by the climate models, they do introduce a bias into any subsequent model estimate of permafrost. Therefore evaluation metrics are defined in relation to the air temperature. This paper shows the climate, snow and permafrost physics of the CMIP6 multi-model ensemble is very similar to that of the CMIP5 multi-model ensemble. The main difference is that a small number of models have demonstrably better snow insulation in CMIP6 than in CMIP5 which improves their representation of the permafrost extent. The simulation of maximum summer thaw depth does not improve between CMIP5 and CMIP6. We suggest that models should include a better resolved and deeper soil profile as a first step towards addressing this. We use the annual mean thawed volume of the top 2 m of the soil defined from the model soil profiles for the permafrost region to quantify changes in permafrost dynamics. The CMIP6 models suggest this is projected to increase by 20–30 %/°C of global mean temperature increase. Under climate change and in equilibrium this may result in an additional 80–120 Gt C/°C of permafrost carbon becoming vulnerable to decomposition.
format Text
author Burke, Eleanor J.
Zhang, Yu
Krinner, Gerhard
spellingShingle Burke, Eleanor J.
Zhang, Yu
Krinner, Gerhard
Evaluating permafrost physics in the CMIP6 models and their sensitivity to climate change
author_facet Burke, Eleanor J.
Zhang, Yu
Krinner, Gerhard
author_sort Burke, Eleanor J.
title Evaluating permafrost physics in the CMIP6 models and their sensitivity to climate change
title_short Evaluating permafrost physics in the CMIP6 models and their sensitivity to climate change
title_full Evaluating permafrost physics in the CMIP6 models and their sensitivity to climate change
title_fullStr Evaluating permafrost physics in the CMIP6 models and their sensitivity to climate change
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating permafrost physics in the CMIP6 models and their sensitivity to climate change
title_sort evaluating permafrost physics in the cmip6 models and their sensitivity to climate change
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2019-309
https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2019-309/
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Climate change
permafrost
genre_facet Arctic
Climate change
permafrost
op_source eISSN: 1994-0424
op_relation doi:10.5194/tc-2019-309
https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2019-309/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2019-309
_version_ 1766342055058997248