Insights on the vulnerability of Antarctic glaciers from the ISMIP6 ice sheet model ensemble and associated uncertainty

The Antarctic Ice Sheet represents the largest source of uncertainty in future sea level rise projections, with a contribution to sea level by 2100 ranging from -5 to 43 cm of sea level equivalent under high carbon emission scenarios estimated by the recent Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison for CMIP6...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seroussi, Hélène, Verjans, Vincent, Nowicki, Sophie, Payne, Antony J., Goelzer, Heiko, Lipscomb, William H., Abe Ouchi, Ayako, Agosta, Cécile, Albrecht, Torsten, Asay-Davis, Xylar, Barthel, Alice, Calov, Reinhard, Cullather, Richard, Dumas, Christophe, Galton-Fenzi, Benjamin K., Gladstone, Rupert, Golledge, Nicholas R., Gregory, Jonathan M., Greve, Ralf, Hatterman, Tore, Hoffman, Matthew J., Humbert, Angelika, Huybrechts, Philippe, Jourdain, Nicolas C., Kleiner, Thomas, Larour, Eric, Leguy, Gunter R., Lowry, Daniel P., Little, Chistopher M., Morlighem, Mathieu, Pattyn, Frank, Pelle, Tyler, Price, Stephen F., Quiquet, Aurélien, Reese, Ronja, Schlegel, Nicole-Jeanne, Shepherd, Andrew, Simon, Erika, Smith, Robin S., Straneo, Fiametta, Sun, Sainan, Trusel, Luke D., Breedam, Jonas, Katwyk, Peter, Wal, Roderik S. W., Winkelmann, Ricarda, Zhao, Chen, Zhang, Tong, Zwinger, Thomas
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-109
https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2023-109/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:tcd113130
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:tcd113130 2023-08-27T04:04:44+02:00 Insights on the vulnerability of Antarctic glaciers from the ISMIP6 ice sheet model ensemble and associated uncertainty Seroussi, Hélène Verjans, Vincent Nowicki, Sophie Payne, Antony J. Goelzer, Heiko Lipscomb, William H. Abe Ouchi, Ayako Agosta, Cécile Albrecht, Torsten Asay-Davis, Xylar Barthel, Alice Calov, Reinhard Cullather, Richard Dumas, Christophe Galton-Fenzi, Benjamin K. Gladstone, Rupert Golledge, Nicholas R. Gregory, Jonathan M. Greve, Ralf Hatterman, Tore Hoffman, Matthew J. Humbert, Angelika Huybrechts, Philippe Jourdain, Nicolas C. Kleiner, Thomas Larour, Eric Leguy, Gunter R. Lowry, Daniel P. Little, Chistopher M. Morlighem, Mathieu Pattyn, Frank Pelle, Tyler Price, Stephen F. Quiquet, Aurélien Reese, Ronja Schlegel, Nicole-Jeanne Shepherd, Andrew Simon, Erika Smith, Robin S. Straneo, Fiametta Sun, Sainan Trusel, Luke D. Breedam, Jonas Katwyk, Peter Wal, Roderik S. W. Winkelmann, Ricarda Zhao, Chen Zhang, Tong Zwinger, Thomas 2023-08-04 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-109 https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2023-109/ eng eng doi:10.5194/tc-2023-109 https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2023-109/ eISSN: 1994-0424 Text 2023 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-109 2023-08-07T16:24:17Z The Antarctic Ice Sheet represents the largest source of uncertainty in future sea level rise projections, with a contribution to sea level by 2100 ranging from -5 to 43 cm of sea level equivalent under high carbon emission scenarios estimated by the recent Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison for CMIP6 (ISMIP6). ISMIP6 highlighted the different behaviors of the East and West Antarctic ice sheets, as well as the possible role of increased surface mass balance in offsetting the dynamic ice loss in response to changing oceanic conditions in ice shelf cavities. However, the detailed contribution of individual glaciers, as well as the partitioning of uncertainty associated with this ensemble, have not yet been investigated. Here, we analyze the ISMIP6 results for high carbon emission scenarios, focusing on key glaciers around the Antarctic Ice Sheet, and we quantify their projected dynamic mass loss, defined here as mass loss through increased ice discharge into the ocean in response to changing oceanic conditions. We highlight glaciers contributing the most to sea level rise as well as their vulnerability to changes in oceanic conditions. We then investigate the different sources of uncertainty and their relative role in projections, for the entire continent and for key individual glaciers. We show that, in addition to Thwaites and Pine Island glaciers in West Antarctica, Totten and Moscow University glaciers in East Antarctica present comparable future dynamic mass loss and high sensitivity to ice shelf basal melt. The overall uncertainty in additional dynamic mass loss in response to changing oceanic conditions, compared to a scenario with constant oceanic conditions, is dominated by the choice of ice sheet model, accounting for 52 % of the total uncertainty of the Antarctic dynamic mass loss in 2100. Its relative role for the most dynamic glaciers varies between 14 % for MacAyeal and Whillans ice streams and 56 % for Pine Island Glacier at the end of the century. The uncertainty associated with the choice of climate ... Text Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica East Antarctica Ice Sheet Ice Shelf Pine Island Pine Island Glacier West Antarctica Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Antarctic The Antarctic East Antarctica West Antarctica Pine Island Glacier ENVELOPE(-101.000,-101.000,-75.000,-75.000) Whillans ENVELOPE(-64.250,-64.250,-84.450,-84.450)
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description The Antarctic Ice Sheet represents the largest source of uncertainty in future sea level rise projections, with a contribution to sea level by 2100 ranging from -5 to 43 cm of sea level equivalent under high carbon emission scenarios estimated by the recent Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison for CMIP6 (ISMIP6). ISMIP6 highlighted the different behaviors of the East and West Antarctic ice sheets, as well as the possible role of increased surface mass balance in offsetting the dynamic ice loss in response to changing oceanic conditions in ice shelf cavities. However, the detailed contribution of individual glaciers, as well as the partitioning of uncertainty associated with this ensemble, have not yet been investigated. Here, we analyze the ISMIP6 results for high carbon emission scenarios, focusing on key glaciers around the Antarctic Ice Sheet, and we quantify their projected dynamic mass loss, defined here as mass loss through increased ice discharge into the ocean in response to changing oceanic conditions. We highlight glaciers contributing the most to sea level rise as well as their vulnerability to changes in oceanic conditions. We then investigate the different sources of uncertainty and their relative role in projections, for the entire continent and for key individual glaciers. We show that, in addition to Thwaites and Pine Island glaciers in West Antarctica, Totten and Moscow University glaciers in East Antarctica present comparable future dynamic mass loss and high sensitivity to ice shelf basal melt. The overall uncertainty in additional dynamic mass loss in response to changing oceanic conditions, compared to a scenario with constant oceanic conditions, is dominated by the choice of ice sheet model, accounting for 52 % of the total uncertainty of the Antarctic dynamic mass loss in 2100. Its relative role for the most dynamic glaciers varies between 14 % for MacAyeal and Whillans ice streams and 56 % for Pine Island Glacier at the end of the century. The uncertainty associated with the choice of climate ...
format Text
author Seroussi, Hélène
Verjans, Vincent
Nowicki, Sophie
Payne, Antony J.
Goelzer, Heiko
Lipscomb, William H.
Abe Ouchi, Ayako
Agosta, Cécile
Albrecht, Torsten
Asay-Davis, Xylar
Barthel, Alice
Calov, Reinhard
Cullather, Richard
Dumas, Christophe
Galton-Fenzi, Benjamin K.
Gladstone, Rupert
Golledge, Nicholas R.
Gregory, Jonathan M.
Greve, Ralf
Hatterman, Tore
Hoffman, Matthew J.
Humbert, Angelika
Huybrechts, Philippe
Jourdain, Nicolas C.
Kleiner, Thomas
Larour, Eric
Leguy, Gunter R.
Lowry, Daniel P.
Little, Chistopher M.
Morlighem, Mathieu
Pattyn, Frank
Pelle, Tyler
Price, Stephen F.
Quiquet, Aurélien
Reese, Ronja
Schlegel, Nicole-Jeanne
Shepherd, Andrew
Simon, Erika
Smith, Robin S.
Straneo, Fiametta
Sun, Sainan
Trusel, Luke D.
Breedam, Jonas
Katwyk, Peter
Wal, Roderik S. W.
Winkelmann, Ricarda
Zhao, Chen
Zhang, Tong
Zwinger, Thomas
spellingShingle Seroussi, Hélène
Verjans, Vincent
Nowicki, Sophie
Payne, Antony J.
Goelzer, Heiko
Lipscomb, William H.
Abe Ouchi, Ayako
Agosta, Cécile
Albrecht, Torsten
Asay-Davis, Xylar
Barthel, Alice
Calov, Reinhard
Cullather, Richard
Dumas, Christophe
Galton-Fenzi, Benjamin K.
Gladstone, Rupert
Golledge, Nicholas R.
Gregory, Jonathan M.
Greve, Ralf
Hatterman, Tore
Hoffman, Matthew J.
Humbert, Angelika
Huybrechts, Philippe
Jourdain, Nicolas C.
Kleiner, Thomas
Larour, Eric
Leguy, Gunter R.
Lowry, Daniel P.
Little, Chistopher M.
Morlighem, Mathieu
Pattyn, Frank
Pelle, Tyler
Price, Stephen F.
Quiquet, Aurélien
Reese, Ronja
Schlegel, Nicole-Jeanne
Shepherd, Andrew
Simon, Erika
Smith, Robin S.
Straneo, Fiametta
Sun, Sainan
Trusel, Luke D.
Breedam, Jonas
Katwyk, Peter
Wal, Roderik S. W.
Winkelmann, Ricarda
Zhao, Chen
Zhang, Tong
Zwinger, Thomas
Insights on the vulnerability of Antarctic glaciers from the ISMIP6 ice sheet model ensemble and associated uncertainty
author_facet Seroussi, Hélène
Verjans, Vincent
Nowicki, Sophie
Payne, Antony J.
Goelzer, Heiko
Lipscomb, William H.
Abe Ouchi, Ayako
Agosta, Cécile
Albrecht, Torsten
Asay-Davis, Xylar
Barthel, Alice
Calov, Reinhard
Cullather, Richard
Dumas, Christophe
Galton-Fenzi, Benjamin K.
Gladstone, Rupert
Golledge, Nicholas R.
Gregory, Jonathan M.
Greve, Ralf
Hatterman, Tore
Hoffman, Matthew J.
Humbert, Angelika
Huybrechts, Philippe
Jourdain, Nicolas C.
Kleiner, Thomas
Larour, Eric
Leguy, Gunter R.
Lowry, Daniel P.
Little, Chistopher M.
Morlighem, Mathieu
Pattyn, Frank
Pelle, Tyler
Price, Stephen F.
Quiquet, Aurélien
Reese, Ronja
Schlegel, Nicole-Jeanne
Shepherd, Andrew
Simon, Erika
Smith, Robin S.
Straneo, Fiametta
Sun, Sainan
Trusel, Luke D.
Breedam, Jonas
Katwyk, Peter
Wal, Roderik S. W.
Winkelmann, Ricarda
Zhao, Chen
Zhang, Tong
Zwinger, Thomas
author_sort Seroussi, Hélène
title Insights on the vulnerability of Antarctic glaciers from the ISMIP6 ice sheet model ensemble and associated uncertainty
title_short Insights on the vulnerability of Antarctic glaciers from the ISMIP6 ice sheet model ensemble and associated uncertainty
title_full Insights on the vulnerability of Antarctic glaciers from the ISMIP6 ice sheet model ensemble and associated uncertainty
title_fullStr Insights on the vulnerability of Antarctic glaciers from the ISMIP6 ice sheet model ensemble and associated uncertainty
title_full_unstemmed Insights on the vulnerability of Antarctic glaciers from the ISMIP6 ice sheet model ensemble and associated uncertainty
title_sort insights on the vulnerability of antarctic glaciers from the ismip6 ice sheet model ensemble and associated uncertainty
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-109
https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2023-109/
long_lat ENVELOPE(-101.000,-101.000,-75.000,-75.000)
ENVELOPE(-64.250,-64.250,-84.450,-84.450)
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
East Antarctica
West Antarctica
Pine Island Glacier
Whillans
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
East Antarctica
West Antarctica
Pine Island Glacier
Whillans
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
East Antarctica
Ice Sheet
Ice Shelf
Pine Island
Pine Island Glacier
West Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
East Antarctica
Ice Sheet
Ice Shelf
Pine Island
Pine Island Glacier
West Antarctica
op_source eISSN: 1994-0424
op_relation doi:10.5194/tc-2023-109
https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2023-109/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-109
_version_ 1775353179460861952