Summer sea ice floe size distribution in the Arctic: High-resolution optical satellite imagery and model evaluation

The sea ice floe size distribution (FSD) is an important component for sea ice thermodynamic and dynamic processes, particularly in the marginal ice zone. Recently FSD-related processes have been incorporated in sea ice models, but the sparsity of existing observations limits the evaluation of FSD m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wang, Yanan, Hwang, Byongjun, Bateson, Adam William, Aksenov, Yevgeny, Horvat, Christopher
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-130
https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2022-130/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:tcd104758
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:tcd104758 2023-05-15T15:00:02+02:00 Summer sea ice floe size distribution in the Arctic: High-resolution optical satellite imagery and model evaluation Wang, Yanan Hwang, Byongjun Bateson, Adam William Aksenov, Yevgeny Horvat, Christopher 2022-07-12 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-130 https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2022-130/ eng eng doi:10.5194/tc-2022-130 https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2022-130/ eISSN: 1994-0424 Text 2022 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-130 2022-07-25T16:22:43Z The sea ice floe size distribution (FSD) is an important component for sea ice thermodynamic and dynamic processes, particularly in the marginal ice zone. Recently FSD-related processes have been incorporated in sea ice models, but the sparsity of existing observations limits the evaluation of FSD models, so hindering model improvements. In this study, three FSD models are selected for the evaluation – Waves-in-Ice module and Power law Floe Size Distribution (WIPoFSD) model and two branches of a fully prognostic floe size-thickness distribution model: CPOM-FSD and FSDv2-WAVE. These models are evaluated against a new FSD dataset derived from high-resolution satellite imagery in the Arctic. The evaluation shows an overall overestimation of floe perimeter density by the models against the observations. Comparison of the normalized distributions of the floe perimeter density with the observations show that the models exhibit much larger proportion for small floes (the radius < 10–30 m) but much smaller proportion for large floes (the radius > 30–50 m). Observations and the WIPoFSD model both show a negative correlation between sea ice concentration and the floe perimeter density, but the two prognostic models (CPOM-FSD and FSDv2-WAVE) show the opposite pattern. These differences between models and the observations may be attributed to limitations of the observations (e.g., the image resolution is not sufficient to detect small floes), or limitations of the model parameterisations, including the use of a global power-law exponent in the WIPoFSD model, as well as too-weak floe welding and enhanced wave fracture in the prognostic models. Text Arctic Sea ice Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description The sea ice floe size distribution (FSD) is an important component for sea ice thermodynamic and dynamic processes, particularly in the marginal ice zone. Recently FSD-related processes have been incorporated in sea ice models, but the sparsity of existing observations limits the evaluation of FSD models, so hindering model improvements. In this study, three FSD models are selected for the evaluation – Waves-in-Ice module and Power law Floe Size Distribution (WIPoFSD) model and two branches of a fully prognostic floe size-thickness distribution model: CPOM-FSD and FSDv2-WAVE. These models are evaluated against a new FSD dataset derived from high-resolution satellite imagery in the Arctic. The evaluation shows an overall overestimation of floe perimeter density by the models against the observations. Comparison of the normalized distributions of the floe perimeter density with the observations show that the models exhibit much larger proportion for small floes (the radius < 10–30 m) but much smaller proportion for large floes (the radius > 30–50 m). Observations and the WIPoFSD model both show a negative correlation between sea ice concentration and the floe perimeter density, but the two prognostic models (CPOM-FSD and FSDv2-WAVE) show the opposite pattern. These differences between models and the observations may be attributed to limitations of the observations (e.g., the image resolution is not sufficient to detect small floes), or limitations of the model parameterisations, including the use of a global power-law exponent in the WIPoFSD model, as well as too-weak floe welding and enhanced wave fracture in the prognostic models.
format Text
author Wang, Yanan
Hwang, Byongjun
Bateson, Adam William
Aksenov, Yevgeny
Horvat, Christopher
spellingShingle Wang, Yanan
Hwang, Byongjun
Bateson, Adam William
Aksenov, Yevgeny
Horvat, Christopher
Summer sea ice floe size distribution in the Arctic: High-resolution optical satellite imagery and model evaluation
author_facet Wang, Yanan
Hwang, Byongjun
Bateson, Adam William
Aksenov, Yevgeny
Horvat, Christopher
author_sort Wang, Yanan
title Summer sea ice floe size distribution in the Arctic: High-resolution optical satellite imagery and model evaluation
title_short Summer sea ice floe size distribution in the Arctic: High-resolution optical satellite imagery and model evaluation
title_full Summer sea ice floe size distribution in the Arctic: High-resolution optical satellite imagery and model evaluation
title_fullStr Summer sea ice floe size distribution in the Arctic: High-resolution optical satellite imagery and model evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Summer sea ice floe size distribution in the Arctic: High-resolution optical satellite imagery and model evaluation
title_sort summer sea ice floe size distribution in the arctic: high-resolution optical satellite imagery and model evaluation
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-130
https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2022-130/
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Sea ice
genre_facet Arctic
Sea ice
op_source eISSN: 1994-0424
op_relation doi:10.5194/tc-2022-130
https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2022-130/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-130
_version_ 1766332137285353472