Validation of Pan-Arctic Soil Temperatures in Modern Reanalysis and Data Assimilation Systems

Reanalysis products provide spatially homogeneous coverage for a variety of climate variables in regions where observational data are limited. However, very little validation of reanalysis soil temperatures in the Arctic has been performed to date, because widespread in situ reference observations h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Herrington, Tyler C., Fletcher, Christopher G., Kropp, Heather
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-5
https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2022-5/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:tcd100607
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:tcd100607 2023-05-15T14:52:03+02:00 Validation of Pan-Arctic Soil Temperatures in Modern Reanalysis and Data Assimilation Systems Herrington, Tyler C. Fletcher, Christopher G. Kropp, Heather 2022-01-25 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-5 https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2022-5/ eng eng doi:10.5194/tc-2022-5 https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2022-5/ eISSN: 1994-0424 Text 2022 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-5 2022-01-31T17:22:16Z Reanalysis products provide spatially homogeneous coverage for a variety of climate variables in regions where observational data are limited. However, very little validation of reanalysis soil temperatures in the Arctic has been performed to date, because widespread in situ reference observations have historically been unavailable there. Here we validate pan-Arctic soil temperatures from eight reanalysis and Land Data Assimilation System (LDAS) products, using a newly-assembled database of in situ data from diverse measurement networks across Eurasia and North America. We find that most products have soil temperatures that are biased cold by 2–7 K across the Arctic, and that biases and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) are generally largest in the cold season. Monthly mean values from most products correlate well with in situ data (R > 0.9) in the warm season, but show lower correlations (r = 0.6–0.8), in many cases, over the cold season. Similarly, the magnitude of monthly variability in soil temperatures is well captured in summer, but overestimated by 20 % to 50 % for several products in winter. The suggestion is that soil temperatures in reanalysis products are subject to much higher uncertainty when the soil is frozen and/or when the ground is snow-covered. We also validate the ensemble mean of all products, and find that when all seasons, and metrics are considered, the ensemble mean generally outperforms any individual product in terms of its correlation and variability, while maintaining relatively low biases. As such, we recommend the ensemble mean soil temperature product for a wide range of applications – such as the validation of soil temperatures in climate models, and to inform models that require soil temperature inputs, such as hydrological models, or for permafrost simulations. Text Arctic permafrost Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description Reanalysis products provide spatially homogeneous coverage for a variety of climate variables in regions where observational data are limited. However, very little validation of reanalysis soil temperatures in the Arctic has been performed to date, because widespread in situ reference observations have historically been unavailable there. Here we validate pan-Arctic soil temperatures from eight reanalysis and Land Data Assimilation System (LDAS) products, using a newly-assembled database of in situ data from diverse measurement networks across Eurasia and North America. We find that most products have soil temperatures that are biased cold by 2–7 K across the Arctic, and that biases and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) are generally largest in the cold season. Monthly mean values from most products correlate well with in situ data (R > 0.9) in the warm season, but show lower correlations (r = 0.6–0.8), in many cases, over the cold season. Similarly, the magnitude of monthly variability in soil temperatures is well captured in summer, but overestimated by 20 % to 50 % for several products in winter. The suggestion is that soil temperatures in reanalysis products are subject to much higher uncertainty when the soil is frozen and/or when the ground is snow-covered. We also validate the ensemble mean of all products, and find that when all seasons, and metrics are considered, the ensemble mean generally outperforms any individual product in terms of its correlation and variability, while maintaining relatively low biases. As such, we recommend the ensemble mean soil temperature product for a wide range of applications – such as the validation of soil temperatures in climate models, and to inform models that require soil temperature inputs, such as hydrological models, or for permafrost simulations.
format Text
author Herrington, Tyler C.
Fletcher, Christopher G.
Kropp, Heather
spellingShingle Herrington, Tyler C.
Fletcher, Christopher G.
Kropp, Heather
Validation of Pan-Arctic Soil Temperatures in Modern Reanalysis and Data Assimilation Systems
author_facet Herrington, Tyler C.
Fletcher, Christopher G.
Kropp, Heather
author_sort Herrington, Tyler C.
title Validation of Pan-Arctic Soil Temperatures in Modern Reanalysis and Data Assimilation Systems
title_short Validation of Pan-Arctic Soil Temperatures in Modern Reanalysis and Data Assimilation Systems
title_full Validation of Pan-Arctic Soil Temperatures in Modern Reanalysis and Data Assimilation Systems
title_fullStr Validation of Pan-Arctic Soil Temperatures in Modern Reanalysis and Data Assimilation Systems
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Pan-Arctic Soil Temperatures in Modern Reanalysis and Data Assimilation Systems
title_sort validation of pan-arctic soil temperatures in modern reanalysis and data assimilation systems
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-5
https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2022-5/
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
permafrost
genre_facet Arctic
permafrost
op_source eISSN: 1994-0424
op_relation doi:10.5194/tc-2022-5
https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2022-5/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-5
_version_ 1766323168503398400