Network connectivity between the winter Arctic Oscillation and summer sea ice in CMIP6 models and observations
The indirect effect of winter Arctic Oscillation (AO) events on the proceeding summer Arctic sea ice extent suggests an inherent winter-to-summer mechanism for sea ice predictability. On the other hand, operational regional summer sea ice forecasts in a large number of coupled climate models show a...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-387 https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2021-387/ |
id |
ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:tcd100257 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:tcd100257 2023-05-15T14:49:55+02:00 Network connectivity between the winter Arctic Oscillation and summer sea ice in CMIP6 models and observations Gregory, William Stroeve, Julienne Tsamados, Michel 2022-01-04 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-387 https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2021-387/ eng eng doi:10.5194/tc-2021-387 https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2021-387/ eISSN: 1994-0424 Text 2022 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-387 2022-01-10T17:22:17Z The indirect effect of winter Arctic Oscillation (AO) events on the proceeding summer Arctic sea ice extent suggests an inherent winter-to-summer mechanism for sea ice predictability. On the other hand, operational regional summer sea ice forecasts in a large number of coupled climate models show a considerable drop in predictive skill for forecasts initialised prior to the date of melt onset in spring, suggesting that some drivers of sea ice variability on longer time scales may not be well represented in these models. To this end, we introduce an unsupervised learning approach based on cluster analysis and complex networks to establish how well the latest generation of coupled climate models participating in phase 6 of the World Climate Research Programme Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) are able to reflect the spatio-temporal patterns of variability in northern-hemisphere winter sea-level pressure and Arctic summer sea ice concentration over the period 1979–2020, relative to ERA5 atmospheric reanalysis and satellite-derived sea ice observations respectively. Two specific global metrics are introduced as ways to compare patterns of variability between models and observations/reanalysis: the Adjusted Rand Index – a method for comparing spatial patterns of variability, and a network distance metric – a method for comparing the degree of connectivity between two geographic regions. We find that CMIP6 models generally reflect the spatial pattern of variability of the AO relatively well, although over-estimate the magnitude of sea-level pressure variability over the north-western Pacific Ocean, and under-estimate the variability over the north Africa and southern Europe. They also under-estimate the importance of regions such as the Beaufort, East Siberian and Laptev seas in explaining pan-Arctic summer sea ice area variability, which we hypothesise is due to regional biases in sea ice thickness. Finally, observations show that historically, winter AO events (negatively) covary strongly with summer sea ice concentration in the eastern Pacific sector of the Arctic, although now under a thinning ice regime, both the eastern and western Pacific sectors exhibit similar behaviour. CMIP6 models however do not show this transition on average, which may hinder their ability to make skilful seasonal to inter-annual predictions of summer sea ice. Text Arctic laptev Sea ice Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Arctic Pacific |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Copernicus Publications: E-Journals |
op_collection_id |
ftcopernicus |
language |
English |
description |
The indirect effect of winter Arctic Oscillation (AO) events on the proceeding summer Arctic sea ice extent suggests an inherent winter-to-summer mechanism for sea ice predictability. On the other hand, operational regional summer sea ice forecasts in a large number of coupled climate models show a considerable drop in predictive skill for forecasts initialised prior to the date of melt onset in spring, suggesting that some drivers of sea ice variability on longer time scales may not be well represented in these models. To this end, we introduce an unsupervised learning approach based on cluster analysis and complex networks to establish how well the latest generation of coupled climate models participating in phase 6 of the World Climate Research Programme Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) are able to reflect the spatio-temporal patterns of variability in northern-hemisphere winter sea-level pressure and Arctic summer sea ice concentration over the period 1979–2020, relative to ERA5 atmospheric reanalysis and satellite-derived sea ice observations respectively. Two specific global metrics are introduced as ways to compare patterns of variability between models and observations/reanalysis: the Adjusted Rand Index – a method for comparing spatial patterns of variability, and a network distance metric – a method for comparing the degree of connectivity between two geographic regions. We find that CMIP6 models generally reflect the spatial pattern of variability of the AO relatively well, although over-estimate the magnitude of sea-level pressure variability over the north-western Pacific Ocean, and under-estimate the variability over the north Africa and southern Europe. They also under-estimate the importance of regions such as the Beaufort, East Siberian and Laptev seas in explaining pan-Arctic summer sea ice area variability, which we hypothesise is due to regional biases in sea ice thickness. Finally, observations show that historically, winter AO events (negatively) covary strongly with summer sea ice concentration in the eastern Pacific sector of the Arctic, although now under a thinning ice regime, both the eastern and western Pacific sectors exhibit similar behaviour. CMIP6 models however do not show this transition on average, which may hinder their ability to make skilful seasonal to inter-annual predictions of summer sea ice. |
format |
Text |
author |
Gregory, William Stroeve, Julienne Tsamados, Michel |
spellingShingle |
Gregory, William Stroeve, Julienne Tsamados, Michel Network connectivity between the winter Arctic Oscillation and summer sea ice in CMIP6 models and observations |
author_facet |
Gregory, William Stroeve, Julienne Tsamados, Michel |
author_sort |
Gregory, William |
title |
Network connectivity between the winter Arctic Oscillation and summer sea ice in CMIP6 models and observations |
title_short |
Network connectivity between the winter Arctic Oscillation and summer sea ice in CMIP6 models and observations |
title_full |
Network connectivity between the winter Arctic Oscillation and summer sea ice in CMIP6 models and observations |
title_fullStr |
Network connectivity between the winter Arctic Oscillation and summer sea ice in CMIP6 models and observations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Network connectivity between the winter Arctic Oscillation and summer sea ice in CMIP6 models and observations |
title_sort |
network connectivity between the winter arctic oscillation and summer sea ice in cmip6 models and observations |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-387 https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2021-387/ |
geographic |
Arctic Pacific |
geographic_facet |
Arctic Pacific |
genre |
Arctic laptev Sea ice |
genre_facet |
Arctic laptev Sea ice |
op_source |
eISSN: 1994-0424 |
op_relation |
doi:10.5194/tc-2021-387 https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2021-387/ |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-387 |
_version_ |
1766321000340783104 |