Understanding model spread in sea ice volume by attribution of model differences in seasonal ice growth and melt

Arctic sea ice is declining rapidly, but predictions of its future loss are made difficult by the large spread both in present-day and in future sea ice area and volume; hence, there is a need to better understand the drivers of model spread in sea ice state. Here we present a framework for understa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Cryosphere
Main Authors: West, Alex, Blockley, Edward, Collins, Matthew
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4013-2022
https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/16/4013/2022/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:tc99065
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:tc99065 2023-05-15T13:11:42+02:00 Understanding model spread in sea ice volume by attribution of model differences in seasonal ice growth and melt West, Alex Blockley, Edward Collins, Matthew 2022-10-07 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4013-2022 https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/16/4013/2022/ eng eng doi:10.5194/tc-16-4013-2022 https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/16/4013/2022/ eISSN: 1994-0424 Text 2022 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4013-2022 2022-10-10T16:22:41Z Arctic sea ice is declining rapidly, but predictions of its future loss are made difficult by the large spread both in present-day and in future sea ice area and volume; hence, there is a need to better understand the drivers of model spread in sea ice state. Here we present a framework for understanding differences between modelled sea ice simulations based on attributing seasonal ice growth and melt differences. In the method presented, the net downward surface flux is treated as the principal driver of seasonal sea ice growth and melt. An energy balance approach is used to estimate the pointwise effect of model differences in key Arctic climate variables on this surface flux and hence on seasonal sea ice growth and melt. We compare three models with very different historical sea ice simulations: HadGEM2-ES, HadGEM3-GC3.1 and UKESM1.0. The largest driver of differences in ice growth and melt between these models is shown to be the ice area in summer (representing the surface albedo feedback) and the ice thickness distribution in winter (the thickness–growth feedback). Differences in snow and melt pond cover during the early summer exert a smaller effect on the seasonal growth and melt, hence representing the drivers of model differences in both this and in the sea ice volume. In particular, the direct impacts on sea ice growth and melt of differing model parameterisations of snow area and of melt ponds are shown to be small but non-negligible. Text albedo Arctic Sea ice Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Arctic The Cryosphere 16 10 4013 4032
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description Arctic sea ice is declining rapidly, but predictions of its future loss are made difficult by the large spread both in present-day and in future sea ice area and volume; hence, there is a need to better understand the drivers of model spread in sea ice state. Here we present a framework for understanding differences between modelled sea ice simulations based on attributing seasonal ice growth and melt differences. In the method presented, the net downward surface flux is treated as the principal driver of seasonal sea ice growth and melt. An energy balance approach is used to estimate the pointwise effect of model differences in key Arctic climate variables on this surface flux and hence on seasonal sea ice growth and melt. We compare three models with very different historical sea ice simulations: HadGEM2-ES, HadGEM3-GC3.1 and UKESM1.0. The largest driver of differences in ice growth and melt between these models is shown to be the ice area in summer (representing the surface albedo feedback) and the ice thickness distribution in winter (the thickness–growth feedback). Differences in snow and melt pond cover during the early summer exert a smaller effect on the seasonal growth and melt, hence representing the drivers of model differences in both this and in the sea ice volume. In particular, the direct impacts on sea ice growth and melt of differing model parameterisations of snow area and of melt ponds are shown to be small but non-negligible.
format Text
author West, Alex
Blockley, Edward
Collins, Matthew
spellingShingle West, Alex
Blockley, Edward
Collins, Matthew
Understanding model spread in sea ice volume by attribution of model differences in seasonal ice growth and melt
author_facet West, Alex
Blockley, Edward
Collins, Matthew
author_sort West, Alex
title Understanding model spread in sea ice volume by attribution of model differences in seasonal ice growth and melt
title_short Understanding model spread in sea ice volume by attribution of model differences in seasonal ice growth and melt
title_full Understanding model spread in sea ice volume by attribution of model differences in seasonal ice growth and melt
title_fullStr Understanding model spread in sea ice volume by attribution of model differences in seasonal ice growth and melt
title_full_unstemmed Understanding model spread in sea ice volume by attribution of model differences in seasonal ice growth and melt
title_sort understanding model spread in sea ice volume by attribution of model differences in seasonal ice growth and melt
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4013-2022
https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/16/4013/2022/
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre albedo
Arctic
Sea ice
genre_facet albedo
Arctic
Sea ice
op_source eISSN: 1994-0424
op_relation doi:10.5194/tc-16-4013-2022
https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/16/4013/2022/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4013-2022
container_title The Cryosphere
container_volume 16
container_issue 10
container_start_page 4013
op_container_end_page 4032
_version_ 1766248640428376064