Development of physically based liquid water schemes for Greenland firn-densification models

As surface melt is increasing on the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS), quantifying the retention capacity of the firn layer is critical to linking meltwater production to meltwater runoff. Firn-densification models have so far relied on empirical approaches to account for the percolation–refreezing proces...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Cryosphere
Main Authors: Verjans, Vincent, Leeson, Amber A., Stevens, C. Max, MacFerrin, Michael, Noël, Brice, Broeke, Michiel R.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1819-2019
https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/13/1819/2019/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:tc74154
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:tc74154 2023-05-15T16:28:59+02:00 Development of physically based liquid water schemes for Greenland firn-densification models Verjans, Vincent Leeson, Amber A. Stevens, C. Max MacFerrin, Michael Noël, Brice Broeke, Michiel R. 2019-07-09 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1819-2019 https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/13/1819/2019/ eng eng doi:10.5194/tc-13-1819-2019 https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/13/1819/2019/ eISSN: 1994-0424 Text 2019 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1819-2019 2020-07-20T16:22:46Z As surface melt is increasing on the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS), quantifying the retention capacity of the firn layer is critical to linking meltwater production to meltwater runoff. Firn-densification models have so far relied on empirical approaches to account for the percolation–refreezing process, and more physically based representations of liquid water flow might bring improvements to model performance. Here we implement three types of water percolation schemes into the Community Firn Model: the bucket approach, the Richards equation in a single domain and the Richards equation in a dual domain, which accounts for partitioning between matrix and fast preferential flow. We investigate their impact on firn densification at four locations on the GrIS and compare model results with observations. We find that for all of the flow schemes, significant discrepancies remain with respect to observed firn density, particularly the density variability in depth, and that inter-model differences are large (porosity of the upper 15 m firn varies by up to 47 %). The simple bucket scheme is as efficient in replicating observed density profiles as the single-domain Richards equation, and the most physically detailed dual-domain scheme does not necessarily reach best agreement with observed data. However, we find that the implementation of preferential flow simulates ice-layer formation more reliably and allows for deeper percolation. We also find that the firn model is more sensitive to the choice of densification scheme than to the choice of water percolation scheme. The disagreements with observations and the spread in model results demonstrate that progress towards an accurate description of water flow in firn is necessary. The numerous uncertainties about firn structure (e.g. grain size and shape, presence of ice layers) and about its hydraulic properties, as well as the one-dimensionality of firn models, render the implementation of physically based percolation schemes difficult. Additionally, the performance of firn models is still affected by the various effects affecting the densification process such as microstructural effects, wet snow metamorphism and temperature sensitivity when meltwater is present. Text Greenland Ice Sheet Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Greenland The Cryosphere 13 7 1819 1842
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description As surface melt is increasing on the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS), quantifying the retention capacity of the firn layer is critical to linking meltwater production to meltwater runoff. Firn-densification models have so far relied on empirical approaches to account for the percolation–refreezing process, and more physically based representations of liquid water flow might bring improvements to model performance. Here we implement three types of water percolation schemes into the Community Firn Model: the bucket approach, the Richards equation in a single domain and the Richards equation in a dual domain, which accounts for partitioning between matrix and fast preferential flow. We investigate their impact on firn densification at four locations on the GrIS and compare model results with observations. We find that for all of the flow schemes, significant discrepancies remain with respect to observed firn density, particularly the density variability in depth, and that inter-model differences are large (porosity of the upper 15 m firn varies by up to 47 %). The simple bucket scheme is as efficient in replicating observed density profiles as the single-domain Richards equation, and the most physically detailed dual-domain scheme does not necessarily reach best agreement with observed data. However, we find that the implementation of preferential flow simulates ice-layer formation more reliably and allows for deeper percolation. We also find that the firn model is more sensitive to the choice of densification scheme than to the choice of water percolation scheme. The disagreements with observations and the spread in model results demonstrate that progress towards an accurate description of water flow in firn is necessary. The numerous uncertainties about firn structure (e.g. grain size and shape, presence of ice layers) and about its hydraulic properties, as well as the one-dimensionality of firn models, render the implementation of physically based percolation schemes difficult. Additionally, the performance of firn models is still affected by the various effects affecting the densification process such as microstructural effects, wet snow metamorphism and temperature sensitivity when meltwater is present.
format Text
author Verjans, Vincent
Leeson, Amber A.
Stevens, C. Max
MacFerrin, Michael
Noël, Brice
Broeke, Michiel R.
spellingShingle Verjans, Vincent
Leeson, Amber A.
Stevens, C. Max
MacFerrin, Michael
Noël, Brice
Broeke, Michiel R.
Development of physically based liquid water schemes for Greenland firn-densification models
author_facet Verjans, Vincent
Leeson, Amber A.
Stevens, C. Max
MacFerrin, Michael
Noël, Brice
Broeke, Michiel R.
author_sort Verjans, Vincent
title Development of physically based liquid water schemes for Greenland firn-densification models
title_short Development of physically based liquid water schemes for Greenland firn-densification models
title_full Development of physically based liquid water schemes for Greenland firn-densification models
title_fullStr Development of physically based liquid water schemes for Greenland firn-densification models
title_full_unstemmed Development of physically based liquid water schemes for Greenland firn-densification models
title_sort development of physically based liquid water schemes for greenland firn-densification models
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1819-2019
https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/13/1819/2019/
geographic Greenland
geographic_facet Greenland
genre Greenland
Ice Sheet
genre_facet Greenland
Ice Sheet
op_source eISSN: 1994-0424
op_relation doi:10.5194/tc-13-1819-2019
https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/13/1819/2019/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1819-2019
container_title The Cryosphere
container_volume 13
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1819
op_container_end_page 1842
_version_ 1766018667140612096