The relation between sea ice thickness and freeboard in the Arctic

Retrieval of Arctic sea ice thickness from CryoSat-2 radar altimeter freeboard data requires observational data to verify the relation between these two variables. In this study in-situ ice and snow data from 689 observation sites, obtained during the Sever expeditions in the 1980s, have been used t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Cryosphere
Main Authors: Alexandrov, V., Sandven, S., Wahlin, J., Johannessen, O. M.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-4-373-2010
https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/4/373/2010/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:tc7286
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:tc7286 2023-05-15T15:00:30+02:00 The relation between sea ice thickness and freeboard in the Arctic Alexandrov, V. Sandven, S. Wahlin, J. Johannessen, O. M. 2018-09-27 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-4-373-2010 https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/4/373/2010/ eng eng doi:10.5194/tc-4-373-2010 https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/4/373/2010/ eISSN: 1994-0424 Text 2018 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-4-373-2010 2020-07-20T16:26:21Z Retrieval of Arctic sea ice thickness from CryoSat-2 radar altimeter freeboard data requires observational data to verify the relation between these two variables. In this study in-situ ice and snow data from 689 observation sites, obtained during the Sever expeditions in the 1980s, have been used to establish an empirical relation between thickness and freeboard of FY ice in late winter. Estimates of mean and variability of snow depth, snow density and ice density were produced on the basis of many field observations. These estimates have been used in the hydrostatic equilibrium equation to retrieve ice thickness as a function of ice freeboard, snow depth and snow/ice density. The accuracy of the ice thickness retrieval has been calculated from the estimated variability in ice and snow parameters and error of ice freeboard measurements. It is found that uncertainties of ice density and freeboard are the major sources of error in ice thickness calculation. For FY ice, retrieval of ≈ 1.0 m (2.0 m) thickness has an uncertainty of 46% (37%), and for MY ice, retrieval of 2.4 m (3.0 m) thickness has an uncertainty of 20% (18%), assuming that the freeboard error is ± 0.03 m for both ice types. For MY ice the main uncertainty is ice density error, since the freeboard error is relatively smaller than that for FY ice. If the freeboard error can be reduced to 0.01 m by averaging measurements from CryoSat-2, the error in thickness retrieval is reduced to about 32% for a 1.0 m thick FY floe and to about 18% for a 2.4 m thick MY floe. The remaining error is dominated by uncertainty in ice density. Provision of improved ice density data is therefore important for accurate retrieval of ice thickness from CryoSat-2 data. Text Arctic Sea ice Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Arctic Sever ENVELOPE(166.083,166.083,62.917,62.917) The Cryosphere 4 3 373 380
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description Retrieval of Arctic sea ice thickness from CryoSat-2 radar altimeter freeboard data requires observational data to verify the relation between these two variables. In this study in-situ ice and snow data from 689 observation sites, obtained during the Sever expeditions in the 1980s, have been used to establish an empirical relation between thickness and freeboard of FY ice in late winter. Estimates of mean and variability of snow depth, snow density and ice density were produced on the basis of many field observations. These estimates have been used in the hydrostatic equilibrium equation to retrieve ice thickness as a function of ice freeboard, snow depth and snow/ice density. The accuracy of the ice thickness retrieval has been calculated from the estimated variability in ice and snow parameters and error of ice freeboard measurements. It is found that uncertainties of ice density and freeboard are the major sources of error in ice thickness calculation. For FY ice, retrieval of ≈ 1.0 m (2.0 m) thickness has an uncertainty of 46% (37%), and for MY ice, retrieval of 2.4 m (3.0 m) thickness has an uncertainty of 20% (18%), assuming that the freeboard error is ± 0.03 m for both ice types. For MY ice the main uncertainty is ice density error, since the freeboard error is relatively smaller than that for FY ice. If the freeboard error can be reduced to 0.01 m by averaging measurements from CryoSat-2, the error in thickness retrieval is reduced to about 32% for a 1.0 m thick FY floe and to about 18% for a 2.4 m thick MY floe. The remaining error is dominated by uncertainty in ice density. Provision of improved ice density data is therefore important for accurate retrieval of ice thickness from CryoSat-2 data.
format Text
author Alexandrov, V.
Sandven, S.
Wahlin, J.
Johannessen, O. M.
spellingShingle Alexandrov, V.
Sandven, S.
Wahlin, J.
Johannessen, O. M.
The relation between sea ice thickness and freeboard in the Arctic
author_facet Alexandrov, V.
Sandven, S.
Wahlin, J.
Johannessen, O. M.
author_sort Alexandrov, V.
title The relation between sea ice thickness and freeboard in the Arctic
title_short The relation between sea ice thickness and freeboard in the Arctic
title_full The relation between sea ice thickness and freeboard in the Arctic
title_fullStr The relation between sea ice thickness and freeboard in the Arctic
title_full_unstemmed The relation between sea ice thickness and freeboard in the Arctic
title_sort relation between sea ice thickness and freeboard in the arctic
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-4-373-2010
https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/4/373/2010/
long_lat ENVELOPE(166.083,166.083,62.917,62.917)
geographic Arctic
Sever
geographic_facet Arctic
Sever
genre Arctic
Sea ice
genre_facet Arctic
Sea ice
op_source eISSN: 1994-0424
op_relation doi:10.5194/tc-4-373-2010
https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/4/373/2010/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-4-373-2010
container_title The Cryosphere
container_volume 4
container_issue 3
container_start_page 373
op_container_end_page 380
_version_ 1766332593420107776