Brief communication: Solar radiation management not as effective as CO2 mitigation for Arctic sea ice loss in hitting the 1.5 and 2 °C COP climate targets

An assessment of the risks of a seasonally ice-free Arctic at 1.5 and 2.0 ∘ C global warming above pre-industrial levels is undertaken using model simulations with solar radiation management to achieve the desired temperatures. An ensemble of the CMIP5 model HadGEM2-ES uses solar radiation managemen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Cryosphere
Main Authors: Ridley, Jeff K., Blockley, Edward W.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3355-2018
https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/3355/2018/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:tc64970
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:tc64970 2023-05-15T14:45:32+02:00 Brief communication: Solar radiation management not as effective as CO2 mitigation for Arctic sea ice loss in hitting the 1.5 and 2 °C COP climate targets Ridley, Jeff K. Blockley, Edward W. 2018-11-27 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3355-2018 https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/3355/2018/ eng eng doi:10.5194/tc-12-3355-2018 https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/3355/2018/ eISSN: 1994-0424 Text 2018 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3355-2018 2020-07-20T16:23:04Z An assessment of the risks of a seasonally ice-free Arctic at 1.5 and 2.0 ∘ C global warming above pre-industrial levels is undertaken using model simulations with solar radiation management to achieve the desired temperatures. An ensemble of the CMIP5 model HadGEM2-ES uses solar radiation management (SRM) to achieve the desired global mean temperatures. It is found that the risk for a seasonally ice-free Arctic is reduced for a target temperature for global warming of 1.5 ∘ C (0.1 %) compared to 2.0 ∘ C (42 %), in general agreement with other methodologies. The SRM produced more ice loss, for a specified global temperature, than for CO 2 mitigation scenarios, as SRM produces a higher polar amplification. Text Arctic Global warming Sea ice Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Arctic The Cryosphere 12 10 3355 3360
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description An assessment of the risks of a seasonally ice-free Arctic at 1.5 and 2.0 ∘ C global warming above pre-industrial levels is undertaken using model simulations with solar radiation management to achieve the desired temperatures. An ensemble of the CMIP5 model HadGEM2-ES uses solar radiation management (SRM) to achieve the desired global mean temperatures. It is found that the risk for a seasonally ice-free Arctic is reduced for a target temperature for global warming of 1.5 ∘ C (0.1 %) compared to 2.0 ∘ C (42 %), in general agreement with other methodologies. The SRM produced more ice loss, for a specified global temperature, than for CO 2 mitigation scenarios, as SRM produces a higher polar amplification.
format Text
author Ridley, Jeff K.
Blockley, Edward W.
spellingShingle Ridley, Jeff K.
Blockley, Edward W.
Brief communication: Solar radiation management not as effective as CO2 mitigation for Arctic sea ice loss in hitting the 1.5 and 2 °C COP climate targets
author_facet Ridley, Jeff K.
Blockley, Edward W.
author_sort Ridley, Jeff K.
title Brief communication: Solar radiation management not as effective as CO2 mitigation for Arctic sea ice loss in hitting the 1.5 and 2 °C COP climate targets
title_short Brief communication: Solar radiation management not as effective as CO2 mitigation for Arctic sea ice loss in hitting the 1.5 and 2 °C COP climate targets
title_full Brief communication: Solar radiation management not as effective as CO2 mitigation for Arctic sea ice loss in hitting the 1.5 and 2 °C COP climate targets
title_fullStr Brief communication: Solar radiation management not as effective as CO2 mitigation for Arctic sea ice loss in hitting the 1.5 and 2 °C COP climate targets
title_full_unstemmed Brief communication: Solar radiation management not as effective as CO2 mitigation for Arctic sea ice loss in hitting the 1.5 and 2 °C COP climate targets
title_sort brief communication: solar radiation management not as effective as co2 mitigation for arctic sea ice loss in hitting the 1.5 and 2 °c cop climate targets
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3355-2018
https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/3355/2018/
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Global warming
Sea ice
genre_facet Arctic
Global warming
Sea ice
op_source eISSN: 1994-0424
op_relation doi:10.5194/tc-12-3355-2018
https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/3355/2018/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3355-2018
container_title The Cryosphere
container_volume 12
container_issue 10
container_start_page 3355
op_container_end_page 3360
_version_ 1766316935749828608