Consistent biases in Antarctic sea ice concentration simulated by climate models

The simulation of Antarctic sea ice in global climate models often does not agree with observations. In this study, we examine the compactness of sea ice, as well as the regional distribution of sea ice concentration, in climate models from the latest Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Cryosphere
Main Authors: Roach, Lettie A., Dean, Samuel M., Renwick, James A.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-365-2018
https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/365/2018/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:tc60116
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:tc60116 2023-05-15T13:54:27+02:00 Consistent biases in Antarctic sea ice concentration simulated by climate models Roach, Lettie A. Dean, Samuel M. Renwick, James A. 2019-01-18 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-365-2018 https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/365/2018/ eng eng doi:10.5194/tc-12-365-2018 https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/365/2018/ eISSN: 1994-0424 Text 2019 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-365-2018 2020-07-20T16:23:26Z The simulation of Antarctic sea ice in global climate models often does not agree with observations. In this study, we examine the compactness of sea ice, as well as the regional distribution of sea ice concentration, in climate models from the latest Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) and in satellite observations. We find substantial differences in concentration values between different sets of satellite observations, particularly at high concentrations, requiring careful treatment when comparing to models. As a fraction of total sea ice extent, models simulate too much loose, low-concentration sea ice cover throughout the year, and too little compact, high-concentration cover in the summer. In spite of the differences in physics between models, these tendencies are broadly consistent across the population of 40 CMIP5 simulations, a result not previously highlighted. Separating models with and without an explicit lateral melt term, we find that inclusion of lateral melt may account for overestimation of low-concentration cover. Targeted model experiments with a coupled ocean–sea ice model show that choice of constant floe diameter in the lateral melt scheme can also impact representation of loose ice. This suggests that current sea ice thermodynamics contribute to the inadequate simulation of the low-concentration regime in many models. Text Antarc* Antarctic Sea ice Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Antarctic The Cryosphere 12 1 365 383
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description The simulation of Antarctic sea ice in global climate models often does not agree with observations. In this study, we examine the compactness of sea ice, as well as the regional distribution of sea ice concentration, in climate models from the latest Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) and in satellite observations. We find substantial differences in concentration values between different sets of satellite observations, particularly at high concentrations, requiring careful treatment when comparing to models. As a fraction of total sea ice extent, models simulate too much loose, low-concentration sea ice cover throughout the year, and too little compact, high-concentration cover in the summer. In spite of the differences in physics between models, these tendencies are broadly consistent across the population of 40 CMIP5 simulations, a result not previously highlighted. Separating models with and without an explicit lateral melt term, we find that inclusion of lateral melt may account for overestimation of low-concentration cover. Targeted model experiments with a coupled ocean–sea ice model show that choice of constant floe diameter in the lateral melt scheme can also impact representation of loose ice. This suggests that current sea ice thermodynamics contribute to the inadequate simulation of the low-concentration regime in many models.
format Text
author Roach, Lettie A.
Dean, Samuel M.
Renwick, James A.
spellingShingle Roach, Lettie A.
Dean, Samuel M.
Renwick, James A.
Consistent biases in Antarctic sea ice concentration simulated by climate models
author_facet Roach, Lettie A.
Dean, Samuel M.
Renwick, James A.
author_sort Roach, Lettie A.
title Consistent biases in Antarctic sea ice concentration simulated by climate models
title_short Consistent biases in Antarctic sea ice concentration simulated by climate models
title_full Consistent biases in Antarctic sea ice concentration simulated by climate models
title_fullStr Consistent biases in Antarctic sea ice concentration simulated by climate models
title_full_unstemmed Consistent biases in Antarctic sea ice concentration simulated by climate models
title_sort consistent biases in antarctic sea ice concentration simulated by climate models
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-365-2018
https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/365/2018/
geographic Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Sea ice
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Sea ice
op_source eISSN: 1994-0424
op_relation doi:10.5194/tc-12-365-2018
https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/12/365/2018/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-365-2018
container_title The Cryosphere
container_volume 12
container_issue 1
container_start_page 365
op_container_end_page 383
_version_ 1766260310997467136