CryoSat-2 delivers monthly and inter-annual surface elevation change for Arctic ice caps

We show that the CryoSat-2 radar altimeter can provide useful estimates of surface elevation change on a variety of Arctic ice caps, on both monthly and yearly timescales. Changing conditions, however, can lead to a varying bias between the elevation estimated from the radar altimeter and the physic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Cryosphere
Main Authors: Gray, L., Burgess, D., Copland, L., Demuth, M. N., Dunse, T., Langley, K., Schuler, T. V.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1895-2015
https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/9/1895/2015/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:tc30281
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:tc30281 2023-05-15T14:59:57+02:00 CryoSat-2 delivers monthly and inter-annual surface elevation change for Arctic ice caps Gray, L. Burgess, D. Copland, L. Demuth, M. N. Dunse, T. Langley, K. Schuler, T. V. 2018-09-27 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1895-2015 https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/9/1895/2015/ eng eng doi:10.5194/tc-9-1895-2015 https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/9/1895/2015/ eISSN: 1994-0424 Text 2018 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1895-2015 2020-07-20T16:24:27Z We show that the CryoSat-2 radar altimeter can provide useful estimates of surface elevation change on a variety of Arctic ice caps, on both monthly and yearly timescales. Changing conditions, however, can lead to a varying bias between the elevation estimated from the radar altimeter and the physical surface due to changes in the ratio of subsurface to surface backscatter. Under melting conditions the radar returns are predominantly from the surface so that if surface melt is extensive across the ice cap estimates of summer elevation loss can be made with the frequent coverage provided by CryoSat-2. For example, the average summer elevation decreases on the Barnes Ice Cap, Baffin Island, Canada were 2.05 ± 0.36 m (2011), 2.55 ± 0.32 m (2012), 1.38 ± 0.40 m (2013) and 1.44 ± 0.37 m (2014), losses which were not balanced by the winter snow accumulation. As winter-to-winter conditions were similar, the net elevation losses were 1.0 ± 0.20 m (winter 2010/11 to winter 2011/12), 1.39 ± 0.20 m (2011/12 to 2012/13) and 0.36 ± 0.20 m (2012/13 to 2013/14); for a total surface elevation loss of 2.75 ± 0.20 m over this 3-year period. In contrast, the uncertainty in height change from Devon Ice Cap, Canada, and Austfonna, Svalbard, can be up to twice as large because of the presence of firn and the possibility of a varying bias between the true surface and the detected elevation due to changing year-to-year conditions. Nevertheless, the surface elevation change estimates from CryoSat for both ice caps are consistent with field and meteorological measurements. Text Arctic Austfonna Baffin Island Baffin Barnes Ice Cap Ice cap Svalbard Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Arctic Austfonna ENVELOPE(24.559,24.559,79.835,79.835) Baffin Island Barnes Ice Cap ENVELOPE(-73.498,-73.498,70.001,70.001) Canada Devon Ice Cap ENVELOPE(-82.499,-82.499,75.335,75.335) Svalbard The Cryosphere 9 5 1895 1913
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description We show that the CryoSat-2 radar altimeter can provide useful estimates of surface elevation change on a variety of Arctic ice caps, on both monthly and yearly timescales. Changing conditions, however, can lead to a varying bias between the elevation estimated from the radar altimeter and the physical surface due to changes in the ratio of subsurface to surface backscatter. Under melting conditions the radar returns are predominantly from the surface so that if surface melt is extensive across the ice cap estimates of summer elevation loss can be made with the frequent coverage provided by CryoSat-2. For example, the average summer elevation decreases on the Barnes Ice Cap, Baffin Island, Canada were 2.05 ± 0.36 m (2011), 2.55 ± 0.32 m (2012), 1.38 ± 0.40 m (2013) and 1.44 ± 0.37 m (2014), losses which were not balanced by the winter snow accumulation. As winter-to-winter conditions were similar, the net elevation losses were 1.0 ± 0.20 m (winter 2010/11 to winter 2011/12), 1.39 ± 0.20 m (2011/12 to 2012/13) and 0.36 ± 0.20 m (2012/13 to 2013/14); for a total surface elevation loss of 2.75 ± 0.20 m over this 3-year period. In contrast, the uncertainty in height change from Devon Ice Cap, Canada, and Austfonna, Svalbard, can be up to twice as large because of the presence of firn and the possibility of a varying bias between the true surface and the detected elevation due to changing year-to-year conditions. Nevertheless, the surface elevation change estimates from CryoSat for both ice caps are consistent with field and meteorological measurements.
format Text
author Gray, L.
Burgess, D.
Copland, L.
Demuth, M. N.
Dunse, T.
Langley, K.
Schuler, T. V.
spellingShingle Gray, L.
Burgess, D.
Copland, L.
Demuth, M. N.
Dunse, T.
Langley, K.
Schuler, T. V.
CryoSat-2 delivers monthly and inter-annual surface elevation change for Arctic ice caps
author_facet Gray, L.
Burgess, D.
Copland, L.
Demuth, M. N.
Dunse, T.
Langley, K.
Schuler, T. V.
author_sort Gray, L.
title CryoSat-2 delivers monthly and inter-annual surface elevation change for Arctic ice caps
title_short CryoSat-2 delivers monthly and inter-annual surface elevation change for Arctic ice caps
title_full CryoSat-2 delivers monthly and inter-annual surface elevation change for Arctic ice caps
title_fullStr CryoSat-2 delivers monthly and inter-annual surface elevation change for Arctic ice caps
title_full_unstemmed CryoSat-2 delivers monthly and inter-annual surface elevation change for Arctic ice caps
title_sort cryosat-2 delivers monthly and inter-annual surface elevation change for arctic ice caps
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1895-2015
https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/9/1895/2015/
long_lat ENVELOPE(24.559,24.559,79.835,79.835)
ENVELOPE(-73.498,-73.498,70.001,70.001)
ENVELOPE(-82.499,-82.499,75.335,75.335)
geographic Arctic
Austfonna
Baffin Island
Barnes Ice Cap
Canada
Devon Ice Cap
Svalbard
geographic_facet Arctic
Austfonna
Baffin Island
Barnes Ice Cap
Canada
Devon Ice Cap
Svalbard
genre Arctic
Austfonna
Baffin Island
Baffin
Barnes Ice Cap
Ice cap
Svalbard
genre_facet Arctic
Austfonna
Baffin Island
Baffin
Barnes Ice Cap
Ice cap
Svalbard
op_source eISSN: 1994-0424
op_relation doi:10.5194/tc-9-1895-2015
https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/9/1895/2015/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1895-2015
container_title The Cryosphere
container_volume 9
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1895
op_container_end_page 1913
_version_ 1766332073572827136