Representation of soil hydrology in permafrost regions may explain large part of inter-model spread in simulated Arctic and subarctic climate

The current generation of Earth system models exhibits large inter-model differences in the simulated climate of the Arctic and subarctic zone, with differences in model structure and parametrizations being one of the main sources of uncertainty. One particularly challenging aspect in modelling is t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Cryosphere
Main Authors: Vrese, Philipp, Georgievski, Goran, Gonzalez Rouco, Jesus Fidel, Notz, Dirk, Stacke, Tobias, Steinert, Norman Julius, Wilkenskjeld, Stiig, Brovkin, Victor
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2095-2023
https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/17/2095/2023/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:tc105247
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:tc105247 2023-06-11T04:08:49+02:00 Representation of soil hydrology in permafrost regions may explain large part of inter-model spread in simulated Arctic and subarctic climate Vrese, Philipp Georgievski, Goran Gonzalez Rouco, Jesus Fidel Notz, Dirk Stacke, Tobias Steinert, Norman Julius Wilkenskjeld, Stiig Brovkin, Victor 2023-05-23 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2095-2023 https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/17/2095/2023/ eng eng doi:10.5194/tc-17-2095-2023 https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/17/2095/2023/ eISSN: 1994-0424 Text 2023 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2095-2023 2023-05-29T16:23:51Z The current generation of Earth system models exhibits large inter-model differences in the simulated climate of the Arctic and subarctic zone, with differences in model structure and parametrizations being one of the main sources of uncertainty. One particularly challenging aspect in modelling is the representation of terrestrial processes in permafrost-affected regions, which are often governed by spatial heterogeneity far below the resolution of the models' land surface components. Here, we use the Max Planck Institute (MPI) Earth System Model to investigate how different plausible assumptions for the representation of permafrost hydrology modulate land–atmosphere interactions and how the resulting feedbacks affect not only the regional and global climate, but also our ability to predict whether the high latitudes will become wetter or drier in a warmer future. Focusing on two idealized setups that induce comparatively “wet” or “dry” conditions in regions that are presently affected by permafrost, we find that the parameter settings determine the direction of the 21st-century trend in the simulated soil water content and result in substantial differences in the land–atmosphere exchange of energy and moisture. The latter leads to differences in the simulated cloud cover during spring and summer and thus in the planetary energy uptake. The respective effects are so pronounced that uncertainties in the representation of the Arctic hydrological cycle can help to explain a large fraction of the inter-model spread in regional surface temperatures and precipitation. Furthermore, they affect a range of components of the Earth system as far to the south as the tropics. With both setups being similarly plausible, our findings highlight the need for more observational constraints on the permafrost hydrology to reduce the inter-model spread in Arctic climate projections. Text Arctic permafrost Subarctic Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Arctic The Cryosphere 17 5 2095 2118
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description The current generation of Earth system models exhibits large inter-model differences in the simulated climate of the Arctic and subarctic zone, with differences in model structure and parametrizations being one of the main sources of uncertainty. One particularly challenging aspect in modelling is the representation of terrestrial processes in permafrost-affected regions, which are often governed by spatial heterogeneity far below the resolution of the models' land surface components. Here, we use the Max Planck Institute (MPI) Earth System Model to investigate how different plausible assumptions for the representation of permafrost hydrology modulate land–atmosphere interactions and how the resulting feedbacks affect not only the regional and global climate, but also our ability to predict whether the high latitudes will become wetter or drier in a warmer future. Focusing on two idealized setups that induce comparatively “wet” or “dry” conditions in regions that are presently affected by permafrost, we find that the parameter settings determine the direction of the 21st-century trend in the simulated soil water content and result in substantial differences in the land–atmosphere exchange of energy and moisture. The latter leads to differences in the simulated cloud cover during spring and summer and thus in the planetary energy uptake. The respective effects are so pronounced that uncertainties in the representation of the Arctic hydrological cycle can help to explain a large fraction of the inter-model spread in regional surface temperatures and precipitation. Furthermore, they affect a range of components of the Earth system as far to the south as the tropics. With both setups being similarly plausible, our findings highlight the need for more observational constraints on the permafrost hydrology to reduce the inter-model spread in Arctic climate projections.
format Text
author Vrese, Philipp
Georgievski, Goran
Gonzalez Rouco, Jesus Fidel
Notz, Dirk
Stacke, Tobias
Steinert, Norman Julius
Wilkenskjeld, Stiig
Brovkin, Victor
spellingShingle Vrese, Philipp
Georgievski, Goran
Gonzalez Rouco, Jesus Fidel
Notz, Dirk
Stacke, Tobias
Steinert, Norman Julius
Wilkenskjeld, Stiig
Brovkin, Victor
Representation of soil hydrology in permafrost regions may explain large part of inter-model spread in simulated Arctic and subarctic climate
author_facet Vrese, Philipp
Georgievski, Goran
Gonzalez Rouco, Jesus Fidel
Notz, Dirk
Stacke, Tobias
Steinert, Norman Julius
Wilkenskjeld, Stiig
Brovkin, Victor
author_sort Vrese, Philipp
title Representation of soil hydrology in permafrost regions may explain large part of inter-model spread in simulated Arctic and subarctic climate
title_short Representation of soil hydrology in permafrost regions may explain large part of inter-model spread in simulated Arctic and subarctic climate
title_full Representation of soil hydrology in permafrost regions may explain large part of inter-model spread in simulated Arctic and subarctic climate
title_fullStr Representation of soil hydrology in permafrost regions may explain large part of inter-model spread in simulated Arctic and subarctic climate
title_full_unstemmed Representation of soil hydrology in permafrost regions may explain large part of inter-model spread in simulated Arctic and subarctic climate
title_sort representation of soil hydrology in permafrost regions may explain large part of inter-model spread in simulated arctic and subarctic climate
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2095-2023
https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/17/2095/2023/
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
permafrost
Subarctic
genre_facet Arctic
permafrost
Subarctic
op_source eISSN: 1994-0424
op_relation doi:10.5194/tc-17-2095-2023
https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/17/2095/2023/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2095-2023
container_title The Cryosphere
container_volume 17
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2095
op_container_end_page 2118
_version_ 1768382350864941056