Geohazard detection using 3D seismic data to enhance offshore scientific drilling site selection

A geohazard assessment workflow is presented that maximizes the use of 3D seismic reflection data to improve the safety and success of offshore scientific drilling. This workflow has been implemented for International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Proposal 909 that aims to core seven sites with tar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientific Drilling
Main Authors: Cox, David R., Knutz, Paul C., Campbell, D. Calvin, Hopper, John R., Newton, Andrew M. W., Huuse, Mads, Gohl, Karsten
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/sd-28-1-2020
https://sd.copernicus.org/articles/28/1/2020/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:sd86212
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:sd86212 2023-05-15T16:29:48+02:00 Geohazard detection using 3D seismic data to enhance offshore scientific drilling site selection Cox, David R. Knutz, Paul C. Campbell, D. Calvin Hopper, John R. Newton, Andrew M. W. Huuse, Mads Gohl, Karsten 2020-12-01 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/sd-28-1-2020 https://sd.copernicus.org/articles/28/1/2020/ eng eng doi:10.5194/sd-28-1-2020 https://sd.copernicus.org/articles/28/1/2020/ eISSN: 1816-3459 Text 2020 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/sd-28-1-2020 2020-12-07T17:22:17Z A geohazard assessment workflow is presented that maximizes the use of 3D seismic reflection data to improve the safety and success of offshore scientific drilling. This workflow has been implemented for International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Proposal 909 that aims to core seven sites with targets between 300 and 1000 m below seabed across the north-western Greenland continental shelf. This glaciated margin is a frontier petroleum province containing potential drilling hazards that must be avoided during drilling. Modern seismic interpretation techniques are used to identify, map and spatially analyse seismic features that may represent subsurface drilling hazards, such as seabed structures, faults, fluids and challenging lithologies. These hazards are compared against the spatial distribution of stratigraphic targets to guide site selection and minimize risk. The 3D seismic geohazard assessment specifically advanced the proposal by providing a more detailed and spatially extensive understanding of hazard distribution that was used to confidently select eight new site locations, abandon four others and fine-tune sites originally selected using 2D seismic data. Had several of the more challenging areas targeted by this proposal only been covered by 2D seismic data, it is likely that they would have been abandoned, restricting access to stratigraphic targets. The results informed the targeted location of an ultra-high-resolution 2D seismic survey by minimizing acquisition in unnecessary areas, saving valuable resources. With future IODP missions targeting similarly challenging frontier environments where 3D seismic data are available, this workflow provides a template for geohazard assessments that will enhance the success of future scientific drilling. Text Greenland Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Greenland Scientific Drilling 28 1 27
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description A geohazard assessment workflow is presented that maximizes the use of 3D seismic reflection data to improve the safety and success of offshore scientific drilling. This workflow has been implemented for International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Proposal 909 that aims to core seven sites with targets between 300 and 1000 m below seabed across the north-western Greenland continental shelf. This glaciated margin is a frontier petroleum province containing potential drilling hazards that must be avoided during drilling. Modern seismic interpretation techniques are used to identify, map and spatially analyse seismic features that may represent subsurface drilling hazards, such as seabed structures, faults, fluids and challenging lithologies. These hazards are compared against the spatial distribution of stratigraphic targets to guide site selection and minimize risk. The 3D seismic geohazard assessment specifically advanced the proposal by providing a more detailed and spatially extensive understanding of hazard distribution that was used to confidently select eight new site locations, abandon four others and fine-tune sites originally selected using 2D seismic data. Had several of the more challenging areas targeted by this proposal only been covered by 2D seismic data, it is likely that they would have been abandoned, restricting access to stratigraphic targets. The results informed the targeted location of an ultra-high-resolution 2D seismic survey by minimizing acquisition in unnecessary areas, saving valuable resources. With future IODP missions targeting similarly challenging frontier environments where 3D seismic data are available, this workflow provides a template for geohazard assessments that will enhance the success of future scientific drilling.
format Text
author Cox, David R.
Knutz, Paul C.
Campbell, D. Calvin
Hopper, John R.
Newton, Andrew M. W.
Huuse, Mads
Gohl, Karsten
spellingShingle Cox, David R.
Knutz, Paul C.
Campbell, D. Calvin
Hopper, John R.
Newton, Andrew M. W.
Huuse, Mads
Gohl, Karsten
Geohazard detection using 3D seismic data to enhance offshore scientific drilling site selection
author_facet Cox, David R.
Knutz, Paul C.
Campbell, D. Calvin
Hopper, John R.
Newton, Andrew M. W.
Huuse, Mads
Gohl, Karsten
author_sort Cox, David R.
title Geohazard detection using 3D seismic data to enhance offshore scientific drilling site selection
title_short Geohazard detection using 3D seismic data to enhance offshore scientific drilling site selection
title_full Geohazard detection using 3D seismic data to enhance offshore scientific drilling site selection
title_fullStr Geohazard detection using 3D seismic data to enhance offshore scientific drilling site selection
title_full_unstemmed Geohazard detection using 3D seismic data to enhance offshore scientific drilling site selection
title_sort geohazard detection using 3d seismic data to enhance offshore scientific drilling site selection
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.5194/sd-28-1-2020
https://sd.copernicus.org/articles/28/1/2020/
geographic Greenland
geographic_facet Greenland
genre Greenland
genre_facet Greenland
op_source eISSN: 1816-3459
op_relation doi:10.5194/sd-28-1-2020
https://sd.copernicus.org/articles/28/1/2020/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/sd-28-1-2020
container_title Scientific Drilling
container_volume 28
container_start_page 1
op_container_end_page 27
_version_ 1766019511050305536