Assessment of responses of North Atlantic winter sea surface temperature to the North Atlantic Oscillation on an interannual scale in 13 CMIP5 models

This study evaluates the response of winter-average sea surface temperature (SST) to the winter North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) simulated by 13 Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) Earth system models in the North Atlantic (NA) (0–65 ∘ N) on an interannual scale. Most of the models...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ocean Science
Main Authors: Jing, Yujie, Li, Yangchun, Xu, Yongfu
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-1509-2020
https://os.copernicus.org/articles/16/1509/2020/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:os84185
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:os84185 2023-05-15T17:28:34+02:00 Assessment of responses of North Atlantic winter sea surface temperature to the North Atlantic Oscillation on an interannual scale in 13 CMIP5 models Jing, Yujie Li, Yangchun Xu, Yongfu 2020-12-11 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-1509-2020 https://os.copernicus.org/articles/16/1509/2020/ eng eng doi:10.5194/os-16-1509-2020 https://os.copernicus.org/articles/16/1509/2020/ eISSN: 1812-0792 Text 2020 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-1509-2020 2020-12-14T17:22:14Z This study evaluates the response of winter-average sea surface temperature (SST) to the winter North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) simulated by 13 Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) Earth system models in the North Atlantic (NA) (0–65 ∘ N) on an interannual scale. Most of the models can reproduce an observed tripolar pattern of the response of the SST anomalies to the NAO on an interannual scale. The model bias is mainly reflected in the locations of the negative-response centers in the subpolar NA (45–65 ∘ N), which is mainly caused by the bias of the response of the SST anomalies to the NAO-driven turbulent heat flux (THF) anomalies. Although the influence of the sensible heat flux (SHF) on the SST is similar to that of the latent heat flux (LHF), it seems that the SHF may play a larger role in the response of the SST to the NAO, and the weak negative response of the SST anomalies to the NAO-driven LHF anomalies is mainly caused by the overestimated oceanic role in the interaction of the LHF and SST. Besides the THF, some other factors which may impact the relationship of the NAO and SST are discussed. The relationship of the NAO and SST is basically not affected by the heat meridional advection transports on an interannual timescale, but it may be influenced by the cutoffs of data filtering, the initial fields, and external-forcing data in some individual models, and in the tropical NA it can also be affected by the different definitions of the NAO indices. Text North Atlantic North Atlantic oscillation Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Ocean Science 16 6 1509 1527
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description This study evaluates the response of winter-average sea surface temperature (SST) to the winter North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) simulated by 13 Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) Earth system models in the North Atlantic (NA) (0–65 ∘ N) on an interannual scale. Most of the models can reproduce an observed tripolar pattern of the response of the SST anomalies to the NAO on an interannual scale. The model bias is mainly reflected in the locations of the negative-response centers in the subpolar NA (45–65 ∘ N), which is mainly caused by the bias of the response of the SST anomalies to the NAO-driven turbulent heat flux (THF) anomalies. Although the influence of the sensible heat flux (SHF) on the SST is similar to that of the latent heat flux (LHF), it seems that the SHF may play a larger role in the response of the SST to the NAO, and the weak negative response of the SST anomalies to the NAO-driven LHF anomalies is mainly caused by the overestimated oceanic role in the interaction of the LHF and SST. Besides the THF, some other factors which may impact the relationship of the NAO and SST are discussed. The relationship of the NAO and SST is basically not affected by the heat meridional advection transports on an interannual timescale, but it may be influenced by the cutoffs of data filtering, the initial fields, and external-forcing data in some individual models, and in the tropical NA it can also be affected by the different definitions of the NAO indices.
format Text
author Jing, Yujie
Li, Yangchun
Xu, Yongfu
spellingShingle Jing, Yujie
Li, Yangchun
Xu, Yongfu
Assessment of responses of North Atlantic winter sea surface temperature to the North Atlantic Oscillation on an interannual scale in 13 CMIP5 models
author_facet Jing, Yujie
Li, Yangchun
Xu, Yongfu
author_sort Jing, Yujie
title Assessment of responses of North Atlantic winter sea surface temperature to the North Atlantic Oscillation on an interannual scale in 13 CMIP5 models
title_short Assessment of responses of North Atlantic winter sea surface temperature to the North Atlantic Oscillation on an interannual scale in 13 CMIP5 models
title_full Assessment of responses of North Atlantic winter sea surface temperature to the North Atlantic Oscillation on an interannual scale in 13 CMIP5 models
title_fullStr Assessment of responses of North Atlantic winter sea surface temperature to the North Atlantic Oscillation on an interannual scale in 13 CMIP5 models
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of responses of North Atlantic winter sea surface temperature to the North Atlantic Oscillation on an interannual scale in 13 CMIP5 models
title_sort assessment of responses of north atlantic winter sea surface temperature to the north atlantic oscillation on an interannual scale in 13 cmip5 models
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-1509-2020
https://os.copernicus.org/articles/16/1509/2020/
genre North Atlantic
North Atlantic oscillation
genre_facet North Atlantic
North Atlantic oscillation
op_source eISSN: 1812-0792
op_relation doi:10.5194/os-16-1509-2020
https://os.copernicus.org/articles/16/1509/2020/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-1509-2020
container_title Ocean Science
container_volume 16
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1509
op_container_end_page 1527
_version_ 1766121320358084608