An alternative method for correcting fluorescence quenching

Under high light intensity, phytoplankton protect their photosystems from bleaching through non-photochemical quenching processes. The consequence of this is suppression of fluorescence emission, which must be corrected when measuring in situ yield with fluorometers. We present data from the Souther...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ocean Science
Main Authors: Biermann, L., Guinet, C., Bester, M., Brierley, A., Boehme, L.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/os-11-83-2015
https://os.copernicus.org/articles/11/83/2015/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:os25010
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:os25010 2023-05-15T16:05:43+02:00 An alternative method for correcting fluorescence quenching Biermann, L. Guinet, C. Bester, M. Brierley, A. Boehme, L. 2018-01-15 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/os-11-83-2015 https://os.copernicus.org/articles/11/83/2015/ eng eng doi:10.5194/os-11-83-2015 https://os.copernicus.org/articles/11/83/2015/ eISSN: 1812-0792 Text 2018 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/os-11-83-2015 2020-07-20T16:24:48Z Under high light intensity, phytoplankton protect their photosystems from bleaching through non-photochemical quenching processes. The consequence of this is suppression of fluorescence emission, which must be corrected when measuring in situ yield with fluorometers. We present data from the Southern Ocean, collected over five austral summers by 19 southern elephant seals tagged with fluorometers. Conventionally, fluorescence data collected during the day (quenched) were corrected using the limit of the mixed layer, assuming that phytoplankton are uniformly mixed from the surface to this depth. However, distinct deep fluorescence maxima were measured in approximately 30% of the night (unquenched) data. To account for the evidence that chlorophyll is not uniformly mixed in the upper layer, we propose correcting from the limit of the euphotic zone, defined as the depth at which photosynthetically available radiation is ~ 1% of the surface value. Mixed layer depth exceeded euphotic depth over 80% of the time. Under these conditions, quenching was corrected from the depth of the remotely derived euphotic zone Z eu , and compared with fluorescence corrected from the depth of the density-derived mixed layer. Deep fluorescence maxima were evident in only 10% of the day data when correcting from mixed layer depth. This was doubled to 21% when correcting from Z eu , more closely matching the unquenched (night) data. Furthermore, correcting from Z eu served to conserve non-uniform chlorophyll features found between the 1% light level and mixed layer depth. Text Elephant Seals Southern Elephant Seals Southern Ocean Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Austral Southern Ocean Ocean Science 11 1 83 91
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description Under high light intensity, phytoplankton protect their photosystems from bleaching through non-photochemical quenching processes. The consequence of this is suppression of fluorescence emission, which must be corrected when measuring in situ yield with fluorometers. We present data from the Southern Ocean, collected over five austral summers by 19 southern elephant seals tagged with fluorometers. Conventionally, fluorescence data collected during the day (quenched) were corrected using the limit of the mixed layer, assuming that phytoplankton are uniformly mixed from the surface to this depth. However, distinct deep fluorescence maxima were measured in approximately 30% of the night (unquenched) data. To account for the evidence that chlorophyll is not uniformly mixed in the upper layer, we propose correcting from the limit of the euphotic zone, defined as the depth at which photosynthetically available radiation is ~ 1% of the surface value. Mixed layer depth exceeded euphotic depth over 80% of the time. Under these conditions, quenching was corrected from the depth of the remotely derived euphotic zone Z eu , and compared with fluorescence corrected from the depth of the density-derived mixed layer. Deep fluorescence maxima were evident in only 10% of the day data when correcting from mixed layer depth. This was doubled to 21% when correcting from Z eu , more closely matching the unquenched (night) data. Furthermore, correcting from Z eu served to conserve non-uniform chlorophyll features found between the 1% light level and mixed layer depth.
format Text
author Biermann, L.
Guinet, C.
Bester, M.
Brierley, A.
Boehme, L.
spellingShingle Biermann, L.
Guinet, C.
Bester, M.
Brierley, A.
Boehme, L.
An alternative method for correcting fluorescence quenching
author_facet Biermann, L.
Guinet, C.
Bester, M.
Brierley, A.
Boehme, L.
author_sort Biermann, L.
title An alternative method for correcting fluorescence quenching
title_short An alternative method for correcting fluorescence quenching
title_full An alternative method for correcting fluorescence quenching
title_fullStr An alternative method for correcting fluorescence quenching
title_full_unstemmed An alternative method for correcting fluorescence quenching
title_sort alternative method for correcting fluorescence quenching
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.5194/os-11-83-2015
https://os.copernicus.org/articles/11/83/2015/
geographic Austral
Southern Ocean
geographic_facet Austral
Southern Ocean
genre Elephant Seals
Southern Elephant Seals
Southern Ocean
genre_facet Elephant Seals
Southern Elephant Seals
Southern Ocean
op_source eISSN: 1812-0792
op_relation doi:10.5194/os-11-83-2015
https://os.copernicus.org/articles/11/83/2015/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/os-11-83-2015
container_title Ocean Science
container_volume 11
container_issue 1
container_start_page 83
op_container_end_page 91
_version_ 1766401617364516864