A comparison between gradient descent and stochastic approaches for parameter optimization of a sea ice model

Two types of optimization methods were applied to a parameter optimization problem in a coupled ocean–sea ice model of the Arctic, and applicability and efficiency of the respective methods were examined. One optimization utilizes a finite difference (FD) method based on a traditional gradient desce...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ocean Science
Main Authors: Sumata, H., Kauker, F., Gerdes, R., Köberle, C., Karcher, M.
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-609-2013
https://os.copernicus.org/articles/9/609/2013/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:os17741
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:os17741 2023-05-15T15:07:33+02:00 A comparison between gradient descent and stochastic approaches for parameter optimization of a sea ice model Sumata, H. Kauker, F. Gerdes, R. Köberle, C. Karcher, M. 2018-01-15 info:eu-repo/semantics/application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-609-2013 https://os.copernicus.org/articles/9/609/2013/ eng eng info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/265863 doi:10.5194/os-9-609-2013 https://os.copernicus.org/articles/9/609/2013/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess eISSN: 1812-0792 info:eu-repo/semantics/Text 2018 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-609-2013 2020-07-20T16:25:25Z Two types of optimization methods were applied to a parameter optimization problem in a coupled ocean–sea ice model of the Arctic, and applicability and efficiency of the respective methods were examined. One optimization utilizes a finite difference (FD) method based on a traditional gradient descent approach, while the other adopts a micro-genetic algorithm (μGA) as an example of a stochastic approach. The optimizations were performed by minimizing a cost function composed of model–data misfit of ice concentration, ice drift velocity and ice thickness. A series of optimizations were conducted that differ in the model formulation ("smoothed code" versus standard code) with respect to the FD method and in the population size and number of possibilities with respect to the μGA method. The FD method fails to estimate optimal parameters due to the ill-shaped nature of the cost function caused by the strong non-linearity of the system, whereas the genetic algorithms can effectively estimate near optimal parameters. The results of the study indicate that the sophisticated stochastic approach (μGA) is of practical use for parameter optimization of a coupled ocean–sea ice model with a medium-sized horizontal resolution of 50 km × 50 km as used in this study. Other/Unknown Material Arctic Sea ice Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Arctic Ocean Science 9 4 609 630
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description Two types of optimization methods were applied to a parameter optimization problem in a coupled ocean–sea ice model of the Arctic, and applicability and efficiency of the respective methods were examined. One optimization utilizes a finite difference (FD) method based on a traditional gradient descent approach, while the other adopts a micro-genetic algorithm (μGA) as an example of a stochastic approach. The optimizations were performed by minimizing a cost function composed of model–data misfit of ice concentration, ice drift velocity and ice thickness. A series of optimizations were conducted that differ in the model formulation ("smoothed code" versus standard code) with respect to the FD method and in the population size and number of possibilities with respect to the μGA method. The FD method fails to estimate optimal parameters due to the ill-shaped nature of the cost function caused by the strong non-linearity of the system, whereas the genetic algorithms can effectively estimate near optimal parameters. The results of the study indicate that the sophisticated stochastic approach (μGA) is of practical use for parameter optimization of a coupled ocean–sea ice model with a medium-sized horizontal resolution of 50 km × 50 km as used in this study.
format Other/Unknown Material
author Sumata, H.
Kauker, F.
Gerdes, R.
Köberle, C.
Karcher, M.
spellingShingle Sumata, H.
Kauker, F.
Gerdes, R.
Köberle, C.
Karcher, M.
A comparison between gradient descent and stochastic approaches for parameter optimization of a sea ice model
author_facet Sumata, H.
Kauker, F.
Gerdes, R.
Köberle, C.
Karcher, M.
author_sort Sumata, H.
title A comparison between gradient descent and stochastic approaches for parameter optimization of a sea ice model
title_short A comparison between gradient descent and stochastic approaches for parameter optimization of a sea ice model
title_full A comparison between gradient descent and stochastic approaches for parameter optimization of a sea ice model
title_fullStr A comparison between gradient descent and stochastic approaches for parameter optimization of a sea ice model
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between gradient descent and stochastic approaches for parameter optimization of a sea ice model
title_sort comparison between gradient descent and stochastic approaches for parameter optimization of a sea ice model
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-609-2013
https://os.copernicus.org/articles/9/609/2013/
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Sea ice
genre_facet Arctic
Sea ice
op_source eISSN: 1812-0792
op_relation info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/265863
doi:10.5194/os-9-609-2013
https://os.copernicus.org/articles/9/609/2013/
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-609-2013
container_title Ocean Science
container_volume 9
container_issue 4
container_start_page 609
op_container_end_page 630
_version_ 1766339034518388736