Revisiting the global mean ocean mass budget over 2005–2020

We investigate the performances of Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and GRACE Follow-On (GRACE-FO) satellite gravimetry missions in assessing the ocean mass budget at the global scale over 2005–2020. For that purpose, we focus on the last years of the record (2015–2020) when GRACE and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ocean Science
Main Authors: Barnoud, Anne, Pfeffer, Julia, Cazenave, Anny, Fraudeau, Robin, Rousseau, Victor, Ablain, Michaël
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-321-2023
https://os.copernicus.org/articles/19/321/2023/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:os105486
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:os105486 2023-05-15T14:13:41+02:00 Revisiting the global mean ocean mass budget over 2005–2020 Barnoud, Anne Pfeffer, Julia Cazenave, Anny Fraudeau, Robin Rousseau, Victor Ablain, Michaël 2023-03-23 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-321-2023 https://os.copernicus.org/articles/19/321/2023/ eng eng doi:10.5194/os-19-321-2023 https://os.copernicus.org/articles/19/321/2023/ eISSN: 1812-0792 Text 2023 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-321-2023 2023-03-27T16:23:11Z We investigate the performances of Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and GRACE Follow-On (GRACE-FO) satellite gravimetry missions in assessing the ocean mass budget at the global scale over 2005–2020. For that purpose, we focus on the last years of the record (2015–2020) when GRACE and GRACE Follow-On faced instrumental problems. We compare the global mean ocean mass estimates from GRACE and GRACE Follow-On to the sum of its contributions from Greenland, Antarctica, land glaciers, terrestrial water storage and atmospheric water content estimated with independent observations. Significant residuals are observed in the global mean ocean mass budget at interannual timescales. Our analyses suggest that the terrestrial water storage variations based on global hydrological models likely contribute in large part to the misclosure of the global mean ocean mass budget at interannual timescales. We also compare the GRACE-based global mean ocean mass with the altimetry-based global mean sea level corrected for the Argo-based thermosteric contribution (an equivalent of global mean ocean mass). After correcting for the wet troposphere drift of the radiometer on board the Jason-3 altimeter satellite, we find that mass budget misclosure is reduced but still significant. However, replacing the Argo-based thermosteric component by the Ocean Reanalysis System 5 (ORAS5) or from the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) top of the atmosphere observations significantly reduces the residuals of the mass budget over the 2015–2020 time span. We conclude that the two most likely sources of error in the global mean ocean mass budget are the thermosteric component based on Argo and the terrestrial water storage contribution based on global hydrological models. The GRACE and GRACE Follow-On data are unlikely to be responsible on their own for the non-closure of the global mean ocean mass budget. Text Antarc* Antarctica Greenland Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Greenland Ocean Science 19 2 321 334
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description We investigate the performances of Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and GRACE Follow-On (GRACE-FO) satellite gravimetry missions in assessing the ocean mass budget at the global scale over 2005–2020. For that purpose, we focus on the last years of the record (2015–2020) when GRACE and GRACE Follow-On faced instrumental problems. We compare the global mean ocean mass estimates from GRACE and GRACE Follow-On to the sum of its contributions from Greenland, Antarctica, land glaciers, terrestrial water storage and atmospheric water content estimated with independent observations. Significant residuals are observed in the global mean ocean mass budget at interannual timescales. Our analyses suggest that the terrestrial water storage variations based on global hydrological models likely contribute in large part to the misclosure of the global mean ocean mass budget at interannual timescales. We also compare the GRACE-based global mean ocean mass with the altimetry-based global mean sea level corrected for the Argo-based thermosteric contribution (an equivalent of global mean ocean mass). After correcting for the wet troposphere drift of the radiometer on board the Jason-3 altimeter satellite, we find that mass budget misclosure is reduced but still significant. However, replacing the Argo-based thermosteric component by the Ocean Reanalysis System 5 (ORAS5) or from the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) top of the atmosphere observations significantly reduces the residuals of the mass budget over the 2015–2020 time span. We conclude that the two most likely sources of error in the global mean ocean mass budget are the thermosteric component based on Argo and the terrestrial water storage contribution based on global hydrological models. The GRACE and GRACE Follow-On data are unlikely to be responsible on their own for the non-closure of the global mean ocean mass budget.
format Text
author Barnoud, Anne
Pfeffer, Julia
Cazenave, Anny
Fraudeau, Robin
Rousseau, Victor
Ablain, Michaël
spellingShingle Barnoud, Anne
Pfeffer, Julia
Cazenave, Anny
Fraudeau, Robin
Rousseau, Victor
Ablain, Michaël
Revisiting the global mean ocean mass budget over 2005–2020
author_facet Barnoud, Anne
Pfeffer, Julia
Cazenave, Anny
Fraudeau, Robin
Rousseau, Victor
Ablain, Michaël
author_sort Barnoud, Anne
title Revisiting the global mean ocean mass budget over 2005–2020
title_short Revisiting the global mean ocean mass budget over 2005–2020
title_full Revisiting the global mean ocean mass budget over 2005–2020
title_fullStr Revisiting the global mean ocean mass budget over 2005–2020
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting the global mean ocean mass budget over 2005–2020
title_sort revisiting the global mean ocean mass budget over 2005–2020
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-321-2023
https://os.copernicus.org/articles/19/321/2023/
geographic Greenland
geographic_facet Greenland
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
Greenland
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
Greenland
op_source eISSN: 1812-0792
op_relation doi:10.5194/os-19-321-2023
https://os.copernicus.org/articles/19/321/2023/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-321-2023
container_title Ocean Science
container_volume 19
container_issue 2
container_start_page 321
op_container_end_page 334
_version_ 1766286178959491072