Automatic snow type classification of snow micropenetrometer profiles with machine learning algorithms

Snow-layer segmentation and classification are essential diagnostic tasks for various cryospheric applications. The SnowMicroPen (SMP) measures the snowpack's penetration force at submillimeter intervals in snow depth. The resulting depth–force profile can be parameterized for density and speci...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geoscientific Model Development
Main Authors: Kaltenborn, Julia, Macfarlane, Amy R., Clay, Viviane, Schneebeli, Martin
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4521-2023
https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/4521/2023/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:gmd106530
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:gmd106530 2023-09-05T13:17:33+02:00 Automatic snow type classification of snow micropenetrometer profiles with machine learning algorithms Kaltenborn, Julia Macfarlane, Amy R. Clay, Viviane Schneebeli, Martin 2023-08-10 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4521-2023 https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/4521/2023/ eng eng doi:10.5194/gmd-16-4521-2023 https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/4521/2023/ eISSN: 1991-9603 Text 2023 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4521-2023 2023-08-14T16:24:20Z Snow-layer segmentation and classification are essential diagnostic tasks for various cryospheric applications. The SnowMicroPen (SMP) measures the snowpack's penetration force at submillimeter intervals in snow depth. The resulting depth–force profile can be parameterized for density and specific surface area. However, no information on traditional snow types is currently extracted automatically. The labeling of snow types is a time-intensive task that requires practice and becomes infeasible for large datasets. Previous work showed that automated segmentation and classification is, in theory, possible but cannot be applied to data straight from the field or needs additional time-costly information, such as from classified snow pits. We evaluate how well machine learning models can automatically segment and classify SMP profiles to address this gap. We trained 14 models, among them semi-supervised models and artificial neural networks (ANNs), on the MOSAiC SMP dataset, an extensive collection of snow profiles on Arctic sea ice. SMP profiles can be successfully segmented and classified into snow classes based solely on the SMP's signal. The model comparison provided in this study enables SMP users to choose a suitable model for their task and dataset. The findings presented will facilitate and accelerate snow type identification through SMP profiles. Anyone can access the tools and models needed to automate snow type identification via the software repository “snowdragon”. Overall, snowdragon creates a link between traditional snow classification and high-resolution force–depth profiles. Traditional snow profile observations can be compared to SMP profiles with such a tool. Text Arctic Sea ice Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Arctic Geoscientific Model Development 16 15 4521 4550
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description Snow-layer segmentation and classification are essential diagnostic tasks for various cryospheric applications. The SnowMicroPen (SMP) measures the snowpack's penetration force at submillimeter intervals in snow depth. The resulting depth–force profile can be parameterized for density and specific surface area. However, no information on traditional snow types is currently extracted automatically. The labeling of snow types is a time-intensive task that requires practice and becomes infeasible for large datasets. Previous work showed that automated segmentation and classification is, in theory, possible but cannot be applied to data straight from the field or needs additional time-costly information, such as from classified snow pits. We evaluate how well machine learning models can automatically segment and classify SMP profiles to address this gap. We trained 14 models, among them semi-supervised models and artificial neural networks (ANNs), on the MOSAiC SMP dataset, an extensive collection of snow profiles on Arctic sea ice. SMP profiles can be successfully segmented and classified into snow classes based solely on the SMP's signal. The model comparison provided in this study enables SMP users to choose a suitable model for their task and dataset. The findings presented will facilitate and accelerate snow type identification through SMP profiles. Anyone can access the tools and models needed to automate snow type identification via the software repository “snowdragon”. Overall, snowdragon creates a link between traditional snow classification and high-resolution force–depth profiles. Traditional snow profile observations can be compared to SMP profiles with such a tool.
format Text
author Kaltenborn, Julia
Macfarlane, Amy R.
Clay, Viviane
Schneebeli, Martin
spellingShingle Kaltenborn, Julia
Macfarlane, Amy R.
Clay, Viviane
Schneebeli, Martin
Automatic snow type classification of snow micropenetrometer profiles with machine learning algorithms
author_facet Kaltenborn, Julia
Macfarlane, Amy R.
Clay, Viviane
Schneebeli, Martin
author_sort Kaltenborn, Julia
title Automatic snow type classification of snow micropenetrometer profiles with machine learning algorithms
title_short Automatic snow type classification of snow micropenetrometer profiles with machine learning algorithms
title_full Automatic snow type classification of snow micropenetrometer profiles with machine learning algorithms
title_fullStr Automatic snow type classification of snow micropenetrometer profiles with machine learning algorithms
title_full_unstemmed Automatic snow type classification of snow micropenetrometer profiles with machine learning algorithms
title_sort automatic snow type classification of snow micropenetrometer profiles with machine learning algorithms
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4521-2023
https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/4521/2023/
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Sea ice
genre_facet Arctic
Sea ice
op_source eISSN: 1991-9603
op_relation doi:10.5194/gmd-16-4521-2023
https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/4521/2023/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4521-2023
container_title Geoscientific Model Development
container_volume 16
container_issue 15
container_start_page 4521
op_container_end_page 4550
_version_ 1776198679315611648