Potentials and pitfalls of permafrost active layer monitoring using the HVSR method: a case study in Svalbard

Time-lapse monitoring of the subsurface using ambient seismic noise is a popular method in environmental seismology. We assess the reliability of the horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (HVSR) method for monitoring seasonal permafrost active layer variability in northwest Svalbard. We observe comp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Earth Surface Dynamics
Main Authors: Köhler, Andreas, Weidle, Christian
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-7-1-2019
https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2019/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:esurf69927
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:esurf69927 2023-05-15T13:02:45+02:00 Potentials and pitfalls of permafrost active layer monitoring using the HVSR method: a case study in Svalbard Köhler, Andreas Weidle, Christian 2019-01-10 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-7-1-2019 https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2019/ eng eng doi:10.5194/esurf-7-1-2019 https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2019/ eISSN: 2196-632X Text 2019 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-7-1-2019 2020-07-20T16:22:59Z Time-lapse monitoring of the subsurface using ambient seismic noise is a popular method in environmental seismology. We assess the reliability of the horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (HVSR) method for monitoring seasonal permafrost active layer variability in northwest Svalbard. We observe complex HVSR variability between 1 and 50 Hz in the record of a temporary seismic deployment covering frozen and thawed soil conditions between April and August 2016. While strong variations are due to changing noise conditions, mainly affected by wind speed and degrading coupling of instruments during melt season, a seasonal trend is observed at some stations that has most likely a subsurface structural cause. A HVSR peak emerges close to the Nyquist frequency (50 Hz) in beginning of June which is then gradually gliding down, reaching frequencies of about 15–25 Hz in the end of August. This observation is consistent with HVSR forward modeling for a set of structural models that simulate different stages of active layer thawing. Our results reveal a number of potential pitfalls when interpreting HVSRs and suggest a careful analysis of temporal variations since HVSR seasonality is not necessarily related to changes in the subsurface. In addition, we investigate if effects of changing noise sources on HVSRs can be avoided by utilizing a directional, narrowband (4.5 Hz) repeating seismic tremor which is observed at the permanent seismic broadband station in the study area. A significant change of the radial component HVSR shape during summer months is observed for all tremors. We show that a thawed active layer with very low seismic velocities would affect Rayleigh wave ellipticities in the tremor frequency band. We compile a list of recommendations for future experiments, including comments on network layouts suitable for array beamforming and waveform correlation methods that can provide essential information on noise source variability. Text Active layer monitoring permafrost Svalbard Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Svalbard Earth Surface Dynamics 7 1 1 16
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description Time-lapse monitoring of the subsurface using ambient seismic noise is a popular method in environmental seismology. We assess the reliability of the horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (HVSR) method for monitoring seasonal permafrost active layer variability in northwest Svalbard. We observe complex HVSR variability between 1 and 50 Hz in the record of a temporary seismic deployment covering frozen and thawed soil conditions between April and August 2016. While strong variations are due to changing noise conditions, mainly affected by wind speed and degrading coupling of instruments during melt season, a seasonal trend is observed at some stations that has most likely a subsurface structural cause. A HVSR peak emerges close to the Nyquist frequency (50 Hz) in beginning of June which is then gradually gliding down, reaching frequencies of about 15–25 Hz in the end of August. This observation is consistent with HVSR forward modeling for a set of structural models that simulate different stages of active layer thawing. Our results reveal a number of potential pitfalls when interpreting HVSRs and suggest a careful analysis of temporal variations since HVSR seasonality is not necessarily related to changes in the subsurface. In addition, we investigate if effects of changing noise sources on HVSRs can be avoided by utilizing a directional, narrowband (4.5 Hz) repeating seismic tremor which is observed at the permanent seismic broadband station in the study area. A significant change of the radial component HVSR shape during summer months is observed for all tremors. We show that a thawed active layer with very low seismic velocities would affect Rayleigh wave ellipticities in the tremor frequency band. We compile a list of recommendations for future experiments, including comments on network layouts suitable for array beamforming and waveform correlation methods that can provide essential information on noise source variability.
format Text
author Köhler, Andreas
Weidle, Christian
spellingShingle Köhler, Andreas
Weidle, Christian
Potentials and pitfalls of permafrost active layer monitoring using the HVSR method: a case study in Svalbard
author_facet Köhler, Andreas
Weidle, Christian
author_sort Köhler, Andreas
title Potentials and pitfalls of permafrost active layer monitoring using the HVSR method: a case study in Svalbard
title_short Potentials and pitfalls of permafrost active layer monitoring using the HVSR method: a case study in Svalbard
title_full Potentials and pitfalls of permafrost active layer monitoring using the HVSR method: a case study in Svalbard
title_fullStr Potentials and pitfalls of permafrost active layer monitoring using the HVSR method: a case study in Svalbard
title_full_unstemmed Potentials and pitfalls of permafrost active layer monitoring using the HVSR method: a case study in Svalbard
title_sort potentials and pitfalls of permafrost active layer monitoring using the hvsr method: a case study in svalbard
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-7-1-2019
https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2019/
geographic Svalbard
geographic_facet Svalbard
genre Active layer monitoring
permafrost
Svalbard
genre_facet Active layer monitoring
permafrost
Svalbard
op_source eISSN: 2196-632X
op_relation doi:10.5194/esurf-7-1-2019
https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2019/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-7-1-2019
container_title Earth Surface Dynamics
container_volume 7
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
op_container_end_page 16
_version_ 1766320539568177152