Arctic sea ice cover data from spaceborne SAR by deep learning

Widely used sea ice concentration and sea ice cover in polar regions are derived mainly from spaceborne microwave radiometer and scatterometer data, and the typical spatial resolution of these products ranges from several to dozens of kilometers. Due to dramatic changes in polar sea ice, high-resolu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wang, Yi-Ran, Li, Xiao-Ming
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2020-332
https://essd.copernicus.org/preprints/essd-2020-332/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:essdd90911
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:essdd90911 2023-05-15T15:00:26+02:00 Arctic sea ice cover data from spaceborne SAR by deep learning Wang, Yi-Ran Li, Xiao-Ming 2020-11-10 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2020-332 https://essd.copernicus.org/preprints/essd-2020-332/ eng eng doi:10.5194/essd-2020-332 https://essd.copernicus.org/preprints/essd-2020-332/ eISSN: 1866-3516 Text 2020 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2020-332 2020-11-16T17:22:15Z Widely used sea ice concentration and sea ice cover in polar regions are derived mainly from spaceborne microwave radiometer and scatterometer data, and the typical spatial resolution of these products ranges from several to dozens of kilometers. Due to dramatic changes in polar sea ice, high-resolution sea ice cover data are drawing increasing attention for polar navigation, environmental research, and offshore operations. In this paper, we focused on developing an approach for deriving a high-resolution sea ice cover product for the Arctic using Sentinel-1 (S1) dual-polarization (horizontal-horizontal, HH, and horizontal-vertical, HV) data in extra wide swath (EW) mode. The approach for discriminating sea ice from open water by synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data is based on a modified U-Net architecture, a deep learning network. By employing an integrated stacking model to combine multiple U-Net classifiers with diverse specializations, sea ice segmentation is achieved with superior accuracy over any individual classifier. We applied the proposed approach to over 28,000 S1 EW images acquired in 2019 to obtain sea ice cover products in a high spatial resolution of 400 m. By converting the S1-derived sea ice cover to concentration and then compared with Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2 (AMSR2) sea ice concentration data, showing an average absolute difference of 5.55 % with seasonal fluctuations. A direct comparison with Interactive Multisensor Snow and Ice Mapping System (IMS) daily sea ice cover data achieves an average accuracy of 93.98 %. These results show that the developed S1-derived sea ice cover results are comparable to the AMSR and IMS data in terms of overall accuracy but superior to these data in presenting detailed sea ice cover information, particularly in the marginal ice zone (MIZ). Data are available at: https://doi.org/10.11922/sciencedb.00273 (Wang and Li, 2020). Text Arctic Sea ice Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description Widely used sea ice concentration and sea ice cover in polar regions are derived mainly from spaceborne microwave radiometer and scatterometer data, and the typical spatial resolution of these products ranges from several to dozens of kilometers. Due to dramatic changes in polar sea ice, high-resolution sea ice cover data are drawing increasing attention for polar navigation, environmental research, and offshore operations. In this paper, we focused on developing an approach for deriving a high-resolution sea ice cover product for the Arctic using Sentinel-1 (S1) dual-polarization (horizontal-horizontal, HH, and horizontal-vertical, HV) data in extra wide swath (EW) mode. The approach for discriminating sea ice from open water by synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data is based on a modified U-Net architecture, a deep learning network. By employing an integrated stacking model to combine multiple U-Net classifiers with diverse specializations, sea ice segmentation is achieved with superior accuracy over any individual classifier. We applied the proposed approach to over 28,000 S1 EW images acquired in 2019 to obtain sea ice cover products in a high spatial resolution of 400 m. By converting the S1-derived sea ice cover to concentration and then compared with Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2 (AMSR2) sea ice concentration data, showing an average absolute difference of 5.55 % with seasonal fluctuations. A direct comparison with Interactive Multisensor Snow and Ice Mapping System (IMS) daily sea ice cover data achieves an average accuracy of 93.98 %. These results show that the developed S1-derived sea ice cover results are comparable to the AMSR and IMS data in terms of overall accuracy but superior to these data in presenting detailed sea ice cover information, particularly in the marginal ice zone (MIZ). Data are available at: https://doi.org/10.11922/sciencedb.00273 (Wang and Li, 2020).
format Text
author Wang, Yi-Ran
Li, Xiao-Ming
spellingShingle Wang, Yi-Ran
Li, Xiao-Ming
Arctic sea ice cover data from spaceborne SAR by deep learning
author_facet Wang, Yi-Ran
Li, Xiao-Ming
author_sort Wang, Yi-Ran
title Arctic sea ice cover data from spaceborne SAR by deep learning
title_short Arctic sea ice cover data from spaceborne SAR by deep learning
title_full Arctic sea ice cover data from spaceborne SAR by deep learning
title_fullStr Arctic sea ice cover data from spaceborne SAR by deep learning
title_full_unstemmed Arctic sea ice cover data from spaceborne SAR by deep learning
title_sort arctic sea ice cover data from spaceborne sar by deep learning
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2020-332
https://essd.copernicus.org/preprints/essd-2020-332/
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Sea ice
genre_facet Arctic
Sea ice
op_source eISSN: 1866-3516
op_relation doi:10.5194/essd-2020-332
https://essd.copernicus.org/preprints/essd-2020-332/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2020-332
_version_ 1766332543147180032