Two decades of flask observations of atmospheric δ(O2∕N2), CO2, and APO at stations Lutjewad (the Netherlands) and Mace Head (Ireland), and 3 years from Halley station (Antarctica)

• Published in: Earth System Science Data
• Main Authors: Nguyen, Linh N. T., Meijer, Harro A. J., Leeuwen, Charlotte, Kers, Bert A. M., Scheeren, Hubertus A., Jones, Anna E., Brough, Neil, Barningham, Thomas, Pickers, Penelope A., Manning, Andrew C., Luijkx, Ingrid T.
• Format: Text
• Language: English
• Published: 2022
• Subjects: Halley Station; Mace; Scripps; Antarc*; Antarctica; North Atlantic
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-991-2022; https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/14/991/2022/

We present 20-year flask sample records of atmospheric CO 2 , δ ( <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M9" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow class="chem"><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></msub><mo>/</mo><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></msub></mrow></math> <svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="34pt" height="14pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="35807b8797f1e0b891dc79aac47c042b"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="essd-14-991-2022-ie00004.svg" width="34pt" height="14pt" src="essd-14-991-2022-ie00004.png"/></svg:svg> ), and atmospheric potential oxygen (APO) from the stations Lutjewad (the Netherlands) and Mace Head (Ireland), and a 3-year record from Halley station (Antarctica). We include details of our calibration procedures and the stability of our calibration scale over time, which we estimate to be 3 per meg over the 11 years of calibration, and our compatibility with the international Scripps O 2 scale. The measurement records from Lutjewad and Mace Head show similar long-term trends during the period 2002–2018 of 2.31 ± 0.07 ppm yr −1 for CO 2 and − 21.2 ± 0.8 per meg yr −1 for δ ( <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M18" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow class="chem"><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></msub><mo>/</mo><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></msub></mrow></math> <svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="34pt" height="14pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="948b40d0edc5fb0e058d74cca032b019"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="essd-14-991-2022-ie00005.svg" width="34pt" height="14pt" src="essd-14-991-2022-ie00005.png"/></svg:svg> ) at Lutjewad, and 2.22 ± 0.04 ppm yr −1 for CO 2 and − 21.3 ± 0.9 per meg yr −1 for δ ( <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M26" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow class="chem"><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></msub><mo>/</mo><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></msub></mrow></math> <svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="34pt" height="14pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="070126b09439e881c0614d775a228ef0"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="essd-14-991-2022-ie00006.svg" width="34pt" height="14pt" src="essd-14-991-2022-ie00006.png"/></svg:svg> ) at Mace Head. They also show a similar δ ( <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M28" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow class="chem"><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></msub><mo>/</mo><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></msub></mrow></math> <svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="34pt" height="14pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="e20398d2b66e20262265917023978e6c"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="essd-14-991-2022-ie00007.svg" width="34pt" height="14pt" src="essd-14-991-2022-ie00007.png"/></svg:svg> ) seasonal cycle with an amplitude of 54 ± 4 per meg at Lutjewad and 61 ± 5 per meg at Mace Head, while the CO 2 seasonal amplitude at Lutjewad (16.8 ± 0.5 ppm) is slightly higher than that at Mace Head (14.8 ± 0.3 ppm). We show that the observed long-term trends and seasonal cycles are in good agreement with the measurements from various other stations, especially the measurements from the Weybourne Atmospheric Observatory (United Kingdom). However, there are remarkable differences in the progression of annual trends between the Mace Head and Lutjewad records for δ ( <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M35" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow class="chem"><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></msub><mo>/</mo><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></msub></mrow></math> <svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="34pt" height="14pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="9ae4f1df5d83b8b35b1e2a1e5a30a6e3"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="essd-14-991-2022-ie00008.svg" width="34pt" height="14pt" src="essd-14-991-2022-ie00008.png"/></svg:svg> ) and APO, which might in part be caused by sampling differences, but also by environmental effects, such as North Atlantic Ocean oxygen ventilation changes to which Mace Head is more sensitive. The Halley record shows clear trends and seasonality in δ ( <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M37" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow class="chem"><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></msub><mo>/</mo><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></msub></mrow></math> <svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="34pt" height="14pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="6d654a1d3c7bca69c48e12909fe0dd04"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="essd-14-991-2022-ie00009.svg" width="34pt" height="14pt" src="essd-14-991-2022-ie00009.png"/></svg:svg> ) and APO, the latter agreeing especially well with continuous measurements at the same location made by the University of East Anglia (UEA), while CO 2 and δ ( <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M40" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow class="chem"><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></msub><mo>/</mo><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></msub></mrow></math> <svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="34pt" height="14pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="29ea80ecc0ae648873de86a45e3b3e13"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="essd-14-991-2022-ie00010.svg" width="34pt" height="14pt" src="essd-14-991-2022-ie00010.png"/></svg:svg> ) present slight disagreements, most likely caused by small leakages during sampling. From our 2002–2018 records, we find a good agreement with Global Carbon Budget 2021 (Friedlingstein et al. (2021) for the global ocean carbon sink: 2.1 ± 0.8 PgC yr −1 , based on the Lutjewad record. The data presented in this work are available at https://doi.org/10.18160/qq7d-t060 (Nguyen et al., 2021).