Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements
Methane (CH 4 ) fluxes emitted by wetlands at high latitudes remain one of the largest sources of uncertainties in global methane budgets. At these latitudes, flux estimation approaches, such as atmospheric inversions, are impacted by improper characterisation of atmospheric transport due to challen...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3559 https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-3559/ |
_version_ | 1821571553912946688 |
---|---|
author | Langot, Félix Crevoisier, Cyril Lauvaux, Thomas Abdallah, Charbel Pernin, Jérôme Lin, Xin Saunois, Marielle Guedj, Axel Ponthieu, Thomas Roiger, Anke Gottschaldt, Klaus-Dirk Fiehn, Alina |
author_facet | Langot, Félix Crevoisier, Cyril Lauvaux, Thomas Abdallah, Charbel Pernin, Jérôme Lin, Xin Saunois, Marielle Guedj, Axel Ponthieu, Thomas Roiger, Anke Gottschaldt, Klaus-Dirk Fiehn, Alina |
author_sort | Langot, Félix |
collection | Copernicus Publications: E-Journals |
description | Methane (CH 4 ) fluxes emitted by wetlands at high latitudes remain one of the largest sources of uncertainties in global methane budgets. At these latitudes, flux estimation approaches, such as atmospheric inversions, are impacted by improper characterisation of atmospheric transport due to challenging meteorological conditions and a lack of measurements. Here, we assess the performances of ERA5 reanalysis, mesoscale simulations from WRF-Chem, and various atmospheric transport models from several global and regional inversion systems using meteorological and CH 4 in-situ measurements collected during the MAGIC2021 campaign near Kiruna, Sweden. Over six measurements days in August 2021, ERA5 exhibited better agreement with observations than WRF-Chem thanks to data assimilation. Nevertheless, WRF-Chem demonstrated proficiency in simulating local atmospheric dynamics. Among global simulations of atmospheric concentrations of CH 4 , inversion-optimised simulations of CH 4 concentrations yielded the best performances, particularly near the surface, with CAMS v21r1 marginally outperforming PYVAR-LMDz-SACS ensemble inversions. WRF-Chem regional simulations revealed performance disparities among CH 4 products, with positive biases in the boundary layer indicative of an overestimation of wetland emissions by selected wetland flux models. All transport models exhibited a vertically delayed gradient of CH 4 mixing ratios near the tropopause, resulting in a positive bias in the stratosphere. The high vertical resolution of CAMS hlkx facilitated a better representation of the vertical structure of CH 4 profiles in the stratosphere. Despite the limited spatiotemporal scope of MAGIC2021, we were able to identify the best performing transport models and to evaluate fluxes from different biogeochemical model parametrisations using the MAGIC2021 high-resolution dataset. |
format | Text |
genre | Kiruna |
genre_facet | Kiruna |
geographic | Kiruna |
geographic_facet | Kiruna |
id | ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:egusphere125090 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
op_collection_id | ftcopernicus |
op_doi | https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3559 |
op_source | eISSN: |
publishDate | 2024 |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:egusphere125090 2025-01-16T22:54:49+00:00 Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements Langot, Félix Crevoisier, Cyril Lauvaux, Thomas Abdallah, Charbel Pernin, Jérôme Lin, Xin Saunois, Marielle Guedj, Axel Ponthieu, Thomas Roiger, Anke Gottschaldt, Klaus-Dirk Fiehn, Alina 2024-11-27 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3559 https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-3559/ eng eng eISSN: Text 2024 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3559 2024-12-04T01:09:38Z Methane (CH 4 ) fluxes emitted by wetlands at high latitudes remain one of the largest sources of uncertainties in global methane budgets. At these latitudes, flux estimation approaches, such as atmospheric inversions, are impacted by improper characterisation of atmospheric transport due to challenging meteorological conditions and a lack of measurements. Here, we assess the performances of ERA5 reanalysis, mesoscale simulations from WRF-Chem, and various atmospheric transport models from several global and regional inversion systems using meteorological and CH 4 in-situ measurements collected during the MAGIC2021 campaign near Kiruna, Sweden. Over six measurements days in August 2021, ERA5 exhibited better agreement with observations than WRF-Chem thanks to data assimilation. Nevertheless, WRF-Chem demonstrated proficiency in simulating local atmospheric dynamics. Among global simulations of atmospheric concentrations of CH 4 , inversion-optimised simulations of CH 4 concentrations yielded the best performances, particularly near the surface, with CAMS v21r1 marginally outperforming PYVAR-LMDz-SACS ensemble inversions. WRF-Chem regional simulations revealed performance disparities among CH 4 products, with positive biases in the boundary layer indicative of an overestimation of wetland emissions by selected wetland flux models. All transport models exhibited a vertically delayed gradient of CH 4 mixing ratios near the tropopause, resulting in a positive bias in the stratosphere. The high vertical resolution of CAMS hlkx facilitated a better representation of the vertical structure of CH 4 profiles in the stratosphere. Despite the limited spatiotemporal scope of MAGIC2021, we were able to identify the best performing transport models and to evaluate fluxes from different biogeochemical model parametrisations using the MAGIC2021 high-resolution dataset. Text Kiruna Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Kiruna |
spellingShingle | Langot, Félix Crevoisier, Cyril Lauvaux, Thomas Abdallah, Charbel Pernin, Jérôme Lin, Xin Saunois, Marielle Guedj, Axel Ponthieu, Thomas Roiger, Anke Gottschaldt, Klaus-Dirk Fiehn, Alina Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements |
title | Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements |
title_full | Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements |
title_fullStr | Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements |
title_short | Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements |
title_sort | evaluating weather and chemical transport models at high latitudes using magic2021 airborne measurements |
url | https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3559 https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-3559/ |