Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements

Methane (CH 4 ) fluxes emitted by wetlands at high latitudes remain one of the largest sources of uncertainties in global methane budgets. At these latitudes, flux estimation approaches, such as atmospheric inversions, are impacted by improper characterisation of atmospheric transport due to challen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Langot, Félix, Crevoisier, Cyril, Lauvaux, Thomas, Abdallah, Charbel, Pernin, Jérôme, Lin, Xin, Saunois, Marielle, Guedj, Axel, Ponthieu, Thomas, Roiger, Anke, Gottschaldt, Klaus-Dirk, Fiehn, Alina
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3559
https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-3559/
_version_ 1821571553912946688
author Langot, Félix
Crevoisier, Cyril
Lauvaux, Thomas
Abdallah, Charbel
Pernin, Jérôme
Lin, Xin
Saunois, Marielle
Guedj, Axel
Ponthieu, Thomas
Roiger, Anke
Gottschaldt, Klaus-Dirk
Fiehn, Alina
author_facet Langot, Félix
Crevoisier, Cyril
Lauvaux, Thomas
Abdallah, Charbel
Pernin, Jérôme
Lin, Xin
Saunois, Marielle
Guedj, Axel
Ponthieu, Thomas
Roiger, Anke
Gottschaldt, Klaus-Dirk
Fiehn, Alina
author_sort Langot, Félix
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
description Methane (CH 4 ) fluxes emitted by wetlands at high latitudes remain one of the largest sources of uncertainties in global methane budgets. At these latitudes, flux estimation approaches, such as atmospheric inversions, are impacted by improper characterisation of atmospheric transport due to challenging meteorological conditions and a lack of measurements. Here, we assess the performances of ERA5 reanalysis, mesoscale simulations from WRF-Chem, and various atmospheric transport models from several global and regional inversion systems using meteorological and CH 4 in-situ measurements collected during the MAGIC2021 campaign near Kiruna, Sweden. Over six measurements days in August 2021, ERA5 exhibited better agreement with observations than WRF-Chem thanks to data assimilation. Nevertheless, WRF-Chem demonstrated proficiency in simulating local atmospheric dynamics. Among global simulations of atmospheric concentrations of CH 4 , inversion-optimised simulations of CH 4 concentrations yielded the best performances, particularly near the surface, with CAMS v21r1 marginally outperforming PYVAR-LMDz-SACS ensemble inversions. WRF-Chem regional simulations revealed performance disparities among CH 4 products, with positive biases in the boundary layer indicative of an overestimation of wetland emissions by selected wetland flux models. All transport models exhibited a vertically delayed gradient of CH 4 mixing ratios near the tropopause, resulting in a positive bias in the stratosphere. The high vertical resolution of CAMS hlkx facilitated a better representation of the vertical structure of CH 4 profiles in the stratosphere. Despite the limited spatiotemporal scope of MAGIC2021, we were able to identify the best performing transport models and to evaluate fluxes from different biogeochemical model parametrisations using the MAGIC2021 high-resolution dataset.
format Text
genre Kiruna
genre_facet Kiruna
geographic Kiruna
geographic_facet Kiruna
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:egusphere125090
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3559
op_source eISSN:
publishDate 2024
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:egusphere125090 2025-01-16T22:54:49+00:00 Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements Langot, Félix Crevoisier, Cyril Lauvaux, Thomas Abdallah, Charbel Pernin, Jérôme Lin, Xin Saunois, Marielle Guedj, Axel Ponthieu, Thomas Roiger, Anke Gottschaldt, Klaus-Dirk Fiehn, Alina 2024-11-27 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3559 https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-3559/ eng eng eISSN: Text 2024 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3559 2024-12-04T01:09:38Z Methane (CH 4 ) fluxes emitted by wetlands at high latitudes remain one of the largest sources of uncertainties in global methane budgets. At these latitudes, flux estimation approaches, such as atmospheric inversions, are impacted by improper characterisation of atmospheric transport due to challenging meteorological conditions and a lack of measurements. Here, we assess the performances of ERA5 reanalysis, mesoscale simulations from WRF-Chem, and various atmospheric transport models from several global and regional inversion systems using meteorological and CH 4 in-situ measurements collected during the MAGIC2021 campaign near Kiruna, Sweden. Over six measurements days in August 2021, ERA5 exhibited better agreement with observations than WRF-Chem thanks to data assimilation. Nevertheless, WRF-Chem demonstrated proficiency in simulating local atmospheric dynamics. Among global simulations of atmospheric concentrations of CH 4 , inversion-optimised simulations of CH 4 concentrations yielded the best performances, particularly near the surface, with CAMS v21r1 marginally outperforming PYVAR-LMDz-SACS ensemble inversions. WRF-Chem regional simulations revealed performance disparities among CH 4 products, with positive biases in the boundary layer indicative of an overestimation of wetland emissions by selected wetland flux models. All transport models exhibited a vertically delayed gradient of CH 4 mixing ratios near the tropopause, resulting in a positive bias in the stratosphere. The high vertical resolution of CAMS hlkx facilitated a better representation of the vertical structure of CH 4 profiles in the stratosphere. Despite the limited spatiotemporal scope of MAGIC2021, we were able to identify the best performing transport models and to evaluate fluxes from different biogeochemical model parametrisations using the MAGIC2021 high-resolution dataset. Text Kiruna Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Kiruna
spellingShingle Langot, Félix
Crevoisier, Cyril
Lauvaux, Thomas
Abdallah, Charbel
Pernin, Jérôme
Lin, Xin
Saunois, Marielle
Guedj, Axel
Ponthieu, Thomas
Roiger, Anke
Gottschaldt, Klaus-Dirk
Fiehn, Alina
Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements
title Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements
title_full Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements
title_fullStr Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements
title_short Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements
title_sort evaluating weather and chemical transport models at high latitudes using magic2021 airborne measurements
url https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3559
https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-3559/