Leaf habit and nutrient availability drive leaf nutrient resorption globally
Nutrient resorption from senescing leaves can significantly affect ecosystem nutrient cycling, making it an essential process to better understand long-term plant productivity under environmental change that affects the balance between nutrient availability and demand. Although it is known that nutr...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Text |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-687 https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-687/ |
| Summary: | Nutrient resorption from senescing leaves can significantly affect ecosystem nutrient cycling, making it an essential process to better understand long-term plant productivity under environmental change that affects the balance between nutrient availability and demand. Although it is known that nutrient resorption rates vary strongly between different species and across environmental gradients, the underlying driving factors are insufficiently quantified. Here, we present an analysis of globally distributed observations of leaf nutrient resorption to investigate the factors driving resorption efficiencies for nitrogen (NRE) and phosphorus (PRE). Our results show that leaf structure and habit, together with indicators of nutrient availability, are the two most important factors driving spatial variation in NRE. Overall, we find higher NRE in deciduous plants (65.2 % ± 12.4 %, n =400 ) than in evergreen plants (57.9 % ± 11.4 %, n =551 ), likely associated with a higher share of metabolic N in leaves of deciduous plants. Tropical regions show the lowest resorption for N (NRE: 52.4 % ± 12.1 %), and tundra ecosystems in polar regions show the highest (NRE: 69.6 % ± 12.8 %). At the same time, the PRE is lowest in temperate regions (57.8 % ± 13.6 %) and highest in boreal regions (67.3 % ± 13.6 %). Soil clay content, N and P atmospheric deposition (globally available proxies for soil fertility), and mean annual precipitation (MAP) play an important role in this pattern. The statistical relationships developed in this analysis indicate the important role of leaf habit and type for nutrient cycling and guide improved representations of plant-internal nutrient recycling and nutrient conservation strategies in vegetation models. |
|---|