Responses of Pine Island and Thwaites Glaciers to Melt and Sliding Parameterizations

The Pine Island and Thwaites glaciers are the two largest contributors to sea level rise from Antarctica. Here we examine the influence of basal friction and ice shelf basal melt in determining projected losses. We examine both Weertman and Coulomb friction laws with explicit weakening as the ice th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joughin, Ian, Shapero, Daniel, Dutrieux, Pierre
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2929
https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2023-2929/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:egusphere116556
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:egusphere116556 2024-06-23T07:47:47+00:00 Responses of Pine Island and Thwaites Glaciers to Melt and Sliding Parameterizations Joughin, Ian Shapero, Daniel Dutrieux, Pierre 2024-05-28 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2929 https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2023-2929/ eng eng doi:10.5194/egusphere-2023-2929 https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2023-2929/ eISSN: Text 2024 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2929 2024-06-13T01:23:50Z The Pine Island and Thwaites glaciers are the two largest contributors to sea level rise from Antarctica. Here we examine the influence of basal friction and ice shelf basal melt in determining projected losses. We examine both Weertman and Coulomb friction laws with explicit weakening as the ice thins to flotation, which many friction laws include implicitly via the effective pressure. We find relatively small differences with the choice of friction law (Weertman or Coulomb) but find losses to be highly sensitive to the rate at which the basal traction is reduced as the area upstream of the grounding line thins. Consistent with earlier work on Pine Island Glacier, we find sea level contributions from both glaciers to vary linearly with the melt volume averaged over time and space, with little influence from the spatial or temporal distribution of melt. Based on recent estimates of melt from other studies, our simulations suggest that the combined melt-driven and sea level rise contribution from both glaciers may not exceed 10 cm by 2200, although the uncertainty in model parameters allows for larger increases. We do not include other factors, such as ice shelf breakup, that might increase loss, or factors such as increased accumulation and isostatic uplift that may mitigate loss. Text Antarc* Antarctica Ice Shelf Pine Island Pine Island Glacier Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Pine Island Glacier ENVELOPE(-101.000,-101.000,-75.000,-75.000) Weertman ENVELOPE(-67.753,-67.753,-66.972,-66.972)
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description The Pine Island and Thwaites glaciers are the two largest contributors to sea level rise from Antarctica. Here we examine the influence of basal friction and ice shelf basal melt in determining projected losses. We examine both Weertman and Coulomb friction laws with explicit weakening as the ice thins to flotation, which many friction laws include implicitly via the effective pressure. We find relatively small differences with the choice of friction law (Weertman or Coulomb) but find losses to be highly sensitive to the rate at which the basal traction is reduced as the area upstream of the grounding line thins. Consistent with earlier work on Pine Island Glacier, we find sea level contributions from both glaciers to vary linearly with the melt volume averaged over time and space, with little influence from the spatial or temporal distribution of melt. Based on recent estimates of melt from other studies, our simulations suggest that the combined melt-driven and sea level rise contribution from both glaciers may not exceed 10 cm by 2200, although the uncertainty in model parameters allows for larger increases. We do not include other factors, such as ice shelf breakup, that might increase loss, or factors such as increased accumulation and isostatic uplift that may mitigate loss.
format Text
author Joughin, Ian
Shapero, Daniel
Dutrieux, Pierre
spellingShingle Joughin, Ian
Shapero, Daniel
Dutrieux, Pierre
Responses of Pine Island and Thwaites Glaciers to Melt and Sliding Parameterizations
author_facet Joughin, Ian
Shapero, Daniel
Dutrieux, Pierre
author_sort Joughin, Ian
title Responses of Pine Island and Thwaites Glaciers to Melt and Sliding Parameterizations
title_short Responses of Pine Island and Thwaites Glaciers to Melt and Sliding Parameterizations
title_full Responses of Pine Island and Thwaites Glaciers to Melt and Sliding Parameterizations
title_fullStr Responses of Pine Island and Thwaites Glaciers to Melt and Sliding Parameterizations
title_full_unstemmed Responses of Pine Island and Thwaites Glaciers to Melt and Sliding Parameterizations
title_sort responses of pine island and thwaites glaciers to melt and sliding parameterizations
publishDate 2024
url https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2929
https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2023-2929/
long_lat ENVELOPE(-101.000,-101.000,-75.000,-75.000)
ENVELOPE(-67.753,-67.753,-66.972,-66.972)
geographic Pine Island Glacier
Weertman
geographic_facet Pine Island Glacier
Weertman
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
Ice Shelf
Pine Island
Pine Island Glacier
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
Ice Shelf
Pine Island
Pine Island Glacier
op_source eISSN:
op_relation doi:10.5194/egusphere-2023-2929
https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2023-2929/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2929
_version_ 1802637942539157504