Simulations of primary and secondary ice production during an Arctic mixed-phase cloud case from the NASCENT campaign

The representation of Arctic clouds and their phase distributions, i.e., the amount of ice and supercooled water, influences predictions of future Arctic warming. Therefore, it is essential that cloud phase is correctly captured by models in order to accurately predict the future Arctic climate. Ice...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Schäfer, Britta, David, Robert Oscar, Georgakaki, Paraskevi, Pasquier, Julie, Sotiropoulou, Georgia, Storelvmo, Trude
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2907
https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-2907/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:egusphere116490
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:egusphere116490 2024-09-15T18:27:19+00:00 Simulations of primary and secondary ice production during an Arctic mixed-phase cloud case from the NASCENT campaign Schäfer, Britta David, Robert Oscar Georgakaki, Paraskevi Pasquier, Julie Sotiropoulou, Georgia Storelvmo, Trude 2024-06-24 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2907 https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-2907/ eng eng doi:10.5194/egusphere-2023-2907 https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-2907/ eISSN: Text 2024 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2907 2024-08-28T05:24:15Z The representation of Arctic clouds and their phase distributions, i.e., the amount of ice and supercooled water, influences predictions of future Arctic warming. Therefore, it is essential that cloud phase is correctly captured by models in order to accurately predict the future Arctic climate. Ice crystal formation in clouds happens through ice nucleation (primary ice production) and ice multiplication (secondary ice production). In common weather and climate models, rime splintering is the only secondary ice production process included. In addition, prescribed number concentrations of cloud condensation nuclei or cloud droplets and ice-nucleating particles are often overestimated in Arctic environments by standard model configurations. This can lead to a misrepresentation of the phase distribution and precipitation formation in Arctic mixed-phase clouds, with important implications for the Arctic surface energy budget. During the Ny-Ålesund Aerosol Cloud Experiment (NASCENT), a holographic probe mounted on a tethered balloon took in situ measurements of number and mass concentrations of ice crystals and cloud droplets in Svalbard, Norway, during fall 2019 and spring 2020. In this study, we choose one case study from this campaign that shows evidence of strong secondary ice production and use the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model to simulate it at a high vertical and spatial resolution. We test the performance of different microphysical parametrizations and apply a new state-of-the-art secondary ice parametrization. We find that agreement with observations highly depends on the prescribed cloud condensation nuclei/cloud droplet and ice-nucleating particle concentrations and requires an enhancement of secondary ice production processes. Lowering mass mixing ratio thresholds for rime splintering inside the Morrison microphysics scheme is crucial to enable secondary ice production and thereby match observations for the right reasons. In our case, rime splintering is required to initiate collisional ... Text Ny Ålesund Ny-Ålesund Svalbard Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description The representation of Arctic clouds and their phase distributions, i.e., the amount of ice and supercooled water, influences predictions of future Arctic warming. Therefore, it is essential that cloud phase is correctly captured by models in order to accurately predict the future Arctic climate. Ice crystal formation in clouds happens through ice nucleation (primary ice production) and ice multiplication (secondary ice production). In common weather and climate models, rime splintering is the only secondary ice production process included. In addition, prescribed number concentrations of cloud condensation nuclei or cloud droplets and ice-nucleating particles are often overestimated in Arctic environments by standard model configurations. This can lead to a misrepresentation of the phase distribution and precipitation formation in Arctic mixed-phase clouds, with important implications for the Arctic surface energy budget. During the Ny-Ålesund Aerosol Cloud Experiment (NASCENT), a holographic probe mounted on a tethered balloon took in situ measurements of number and mass concentrations of ice crystals and cloud droplets in Svalbard, Norway, during fall 2019 and spring 2020. In this study, we choose one case study from this campaign that shows evidence of strong secondary ice production and use the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model to simulate it at a high vertical and spatial resolution. We test the performance of different microphysical parametrizations and apply a new state-of-the-art secondary ice parametrization. We find that agreement with observations highly depends on the prescribed cloud condensation nuclei/cloud droplet and ice-nucleating particle concentrations and requires an enhancement of secondary ice production processes. Lowering mass mixing ratio thresholds for rime splintering inside the Morrison microphysics scheme is crucial to enable secondary ice production and thereby match observations for the right reasons. In our case, rime splintering is required to initiate collisional ...
format Text
author Schäfer, Britta
David, Robert Oscar
Georgakaki, Paraskevi
Pasquier, Julie
Sotiropoulou, Georgia
Storelvmo, Trude
spellingShingle Schäfer, Britta
David, Robert Oscar
Georgakaki, Paraskevi
Pasquier, Julie
Sotiropoulou, Georgia
Storelvmo, Trude
Simulations of primary and secondary ice production during an Arctic mixed-phase cloud case from the NASCENT campaign
author_facet Schäfer, Britta
David, Robert Oscar
Georgakaki, Paraskevi
Pasquier, Julie
Sotiropoulou, Georgia
Storelvmo, Trude
author_sort Schäfer, Britta
title Simulations of primary and secondary ice production during an Arctic mixed-phase cloud case from the NASCENT campaign
title_short Simulations of primary and secondary ice production during an Arctic mixed-phase cloud case from the NASCENT campaign
title_full Simulations of primary and secondary ice production during an Arctic mixed-phase cloud case from the NASCENT campaign
title_fullStr Simulations of primary and secondary ice production during an Arctic mixed-phase cloud case from the NASCENT campaign
title_full_unstemmed Simulations of primary and secondary ice production during an Arctic mixed-phase cloud case from the NASCENT campaign
title_sort simulations of primary and secondary ice production during an arctic mixed-phase cloud case from the nascent campaign
publishDate 2024
url https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2907
https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-2907/
genre Ny Ålesund
Ny-Ålesund
Svalbard
genre_facet Ny Ålesund
Ny-Ålesund
Svalbard
op_source eISSN:
op_relation doi:10.5194/egusphere-2023-2907
https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-2907/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2907
_version_ 1810468542110236672