Supercooled liquid water cloud classification using lidar backscatter peak properties

The use of depolarization lidar to measure atmospheric volume depolarization ratio (VDR) is a common technique to classify cloud phase (liquid or ice). Previous work using a machine learning framework, applied to peak properties derived from co-polarised attenuated backscatter data, has been demonst...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Whitehead, Luke Edgar, McDonald, Adrian James, Guyot, Adrien
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1085
https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1085/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:egusphere111675
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:egusphere111675 2023-07-30T03:58:19+02:00 Supercooled liquid water cloud classification using lidar backscatter peak properties Whitehead, Luke Edgar McDonald, Adrian James Guyot, Adrien 2023-07-10 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1085 https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1085/ eng eng doi:10.5194/egusphere-2023-1085 https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1085/ eISSN: Text 2023 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1085 2023-07-17T16:24:18Z The use of depolarization lidar to measure atmospheric volume depolarization ratio (VDR) is a common technique to classify cloud phase (liquid or ice). Previous work using a machine learning framework, applied to peak properties derived from co-polarised attenuated backscatter data, has been demonstrated to effectively detect supercooled liquid water containing clouds (SLCC). However, the training data from Davis Station, Antarctica, includes no warm liquid water clouds (WLCC), potentially limiting the model’s accuracy in regions where WLCC are present. In this work, we apply the Davis model to a 9-month Micro Pulse Lidar dataset collected in Christchurch, New Zealand, a location which includes WLCC. We then evaluate the results relative to a reference VDR cloud phase mask. We found that the Davis model performed relatively poorly at detecting SLCC with an accuracy of 0.62, often misclassifying WLCC as SLCC. We then trained a new model, using data from Christchurch, to perform SLCC detection on the same set of co-polarized attenuated backscatter peak properties. Our new model performed well, with accuracy scores as high as 0.89, highlighting the effectiveness of the machine learning technique when appropriate training data relevant to the location is used. Text Antarc* Antarctica Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Christchurch ENVELOPE(164.167,164.167,-82.467,-82.467) Davis Station ENVELOPE(77.968,77.968,-68.576,-68.576) Davis-Station ENVELOPE(77.968,77.968,-68.576,-68.576) New Zealand
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description The use of depolarization lidar to measure atmospheric volume depolarization ratio (VDR) is a common technique to classify cloud phase (liquid or ice). Previous work using a machine learning framework, applied to peak properties derived from co-polarised attenuated backscatter data, has been demonstrated to effectively detect supercooled liquid water containing clouds (SLCC). However, the training data from Davis Station, Antarctica, includes no warm liquid water clouds (WLCC), potentially limiting the model’s accuracy in regions where WLCC are present. In this work, we apply the Davis model to a 9-month Micro Pulse Lidar dataset collected in Christchurch, New Zealand, a location which includes WLCC. We then evaluate the results relative to a reference VDR cloud phase mask. We found that the Davis model performed relatively poorly at detecting SLCC with an accuracy of 0.62, often misclassifying WLCC as SLCC. We then trained a new model, using data from Christchurch, to perform SLCC detection on the same set of co-polarized attenuated backscatter peak properties. Our new model performed well, with accuracy scores as high as 0.89, highlighting the effectiveness of the machine learning technique when appropriate training data relevant to the location is used.
format Text
author Whitehead, Luke Edgar
McDonald, Adrian James
Guyot, Adrien
spellingShingle Whitehead, Luke Edgar
McDonald, Adrian James
Guyot, Adrien
Supercooled liquid water cloud classification using lidar backscatter peak properties
author_facet Whitehead, Luke Edgar
McDonald, Adrian James
Guyot, Adrien
author_sort Whitehead, Luke Edgar
title Supercooled liquid water cloud classification using lidar backscatter peak properties
title_short Supercooled liquid water cloud classification using lidar backscatter peak properties
title_full Supercooled liquid water cloud classification using lidar backscatter peak properties
title_fullStr Supercooled liquid water cloud classification using lidar backscatter peak properties
title_full_unstemmed Supercooled liquid water cloud classification using lidar backscatter peak properties
title_sort supercooled liquid water cloud classification using lidar backscatter peak properties
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1085
https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1085/
long_lat ENVELOPE(164.167,164.167,-82.467,-82.467)
ENVELOPE(77.968,77.968,-68.576,-68.576)
ENVELOPE(77.968,77.968,-68.576,-68.576)
geographic Christchurch
Davis Station
Davis-Station
New Zealand
geographic_facet Christchurch
Davis Station
Davis-Station
New Zealand
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_source eISSN:
op_relation doi:10.5194/egusphere-2023-1085
https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1085/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1085
_version_ 1772821149913186304