How did Marine Isotope Stage 3 and Last Glacial Maximum climates differ? – Perspectives from equilibrium simulations

Dansgaard-Oeschger events occurred frequently during Marine Isotope Stage 3 (MIS3), as opposed to the following MIS2 period, which included the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). Transient climate model simulations suggest that these abrupt warming events in Greenland and the North Atlantic region are asso...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Climate of the Past
Main Authors: Meerbeeck, C. J., Renssen, H., Roche, D. M.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-5-33-2009
https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/5/33/2009/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:cp6331
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:cp6331 2023-05-15T16:00:05+02:00 How did Marine Isotope Stage 3 and Last Glacial Maximum climates differ? – Perspectives from equilibrium simulations Meerbeeck, C. J. Renssen, H. Roche, D. M. 2018-09-27 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-5-33-2009 https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/5/33/2009/ eng eng doi:10.5194/cp-5-33-2009 https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/5/33/2009/ eISSN: 1814-9332 Text 2018 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-5-33-2009 2020-07-20T16:26:44Z Dansgaard-Oeschger events occurred frequently during Marine Isotope Stage 3 (MIS3), as opposed to the following MIS2 period, which included the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). Transient climate model simulations suggest that these abrupt warming events in Greenland and the North Atlantic region are associated with a resumption of the Thermohaline Circulation (THC) from a weak state during stadials to a relatively strong state during interstadials. However, those models were run with LGM, rather than MIS3 boundary conditions. To quantify the influence of different boundary conditions on the climates of MIS3 and LGM, we perform two equilibrium climate simulations with the three-dimensional earth system model LOVECLIM, one for stadial, the other for interstadial conditions. We compare them to the LGM state simulated with the same model. Both climate states are globally 2°C warmer than LGM. A striking feature of our MIS3 simulations is the enhanced Northern Hemisphere seasonality, July surface air temperatures being 4°C warmer than in LGM. Also, despite some modification in the location of North Atlantic deep water formation, deep water export to the South Atlantic remains unaffected. To study specifically the effect of orbital forcing, we perform two additional sensitivity experiments spun up from our stadial simulation. The insolation difference between MIS3 and LGM causes half of the 30–60° N July temperature anomaly (+6°C). In a third simulation additional freshwater forcing halts the Atlantic THC, yielding a much colder North Atlantic region (−7°C). Comparing our simulation with proxy data, we find that the MIS3 climate with collapsed THC mimics stadials over the North Atlantic better than both control experiments, which might crudely estimate interstadial climate. These results suggest that freshwater forcing is necessary to return climate from warm interstadials to cold stadials during MIS3. This changes our perspective, making the stadial climate a perturbed climate state rather than a typical, near-equilibrium MIS3 climate. Text Dansgaard-Oeschger events Greenland North Atlantic Deep Water North Atlantic Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Greenland Climate of the Past 5 1 33 51
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description Dansgaard-Oeschger events occurred frequently during Marine Isotope Stage 3 (MIS3), as opposed to the following MIS2 period, which included the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). Transient climate model simulations suggest that these abrupt warming events in Greenland and the North Atlantic region are associated with a resumption of the Thermohaline Circulation (THC) from a weak state during stadials to a relatively strong state during interstadials. However, those models were run with LGM, rather than MIS3 boundary conditions. To quantify the influence of different boundary conditions on the climates of MIS3 and LGM, we perform two equilibrium climate simulations with the three-dimensional earth system model LOVECLIM, one for stadial, the other for interstadial conditions. We compare them to the LGM state simulated with the same model. Both climate states are globally 2°C warmer than LGM. A striking feature of our MIS3 simulations is the enhanced Northern Hemisphere seasonality, July surface air temperatures being 4°C warmer than in LGM. Also, despite some modification in the location of North Atlantic deep water formation, deep water export to the South Atlantic remains unaffected. To study specifically the effect of orbital forcing, we perform two additional sensitivity experiments spun up from our stadial simulation. The insolation difference between MIS3 and LGM causes half of the 30–60° N July temperature anomaly (+6°C). In a third simulation additional freshwater forcing halts the Atlantic THC, yielding a much colder North Atlantic region (−7°C). Comparing our simulation with proxy data, we find that the MIS3 climate with collapsed THC mimics stadials over the North Atlantic better than both control experiments, which might crudely estimate interstadial climate. These results suggest that freshwater forcing is necessary to return climate from warm interstadials to cold stadials during MIS3. This changes our perspective, making the stadial climate a perturbed climate state rather than a typical, near-equilibrium MIS3 climate.
format Text
author Meerbeeck, C. J.
Renssen, H.
Roche, D. M.
spellingShingle Meerbeeck, C. J.
Renssen, H.
Roche, D. M.
How did Marine Isotope Stage 3 and Last Glacial Maximum climates differ? – Perspectives from equilibrium simulations
author_facet Meerbeeck, C. J.
Renssen, H.
Roche, D. M.
author_sort Meerbeeck, C. J.
title How did Marine Isotope Stage 3 and Last Glacial Maximum climates differ? – Perspectives from equilibrium simulations
title_short How did Marine Isotope Stage 3 and Last Glacial Maximum climates differ? – Perspectives from equilibrium simulations
title_full How did Marine Isotope Stage 3 and Last Glacial Maximum climates differ? – Perspectives from equilibrium simulations
title_fullStr How did Marine Isotope Stage 3 and Last Glacial Maximum climates differ? – Perspectives from equilibrium simulations
title_full_unstemmed How did Marine Isotope Stage 3 and Last Glacial Maximum climates differ? – Perspectives from equilibrium simulations
title_sort how did marine isotope stage 3 and last glacial maximum climates differ? – perspectives from equilibrium simulations
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-5-33-2009
https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/5/33/2009/
geographic Greenland
geographic_facet Greenland
genre Dansgaard-Oeschger events
Greenland
North Atlantic Deep Water
North Atlantic
genre_facet Dansgaard-Oeschger events
Greenland
North Atlantic Deep Water
North Atlantic
op_source eISSN: 1814-9332
op_relation doi:10.5194/cp-5-33-2009
https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/5/33/2009/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-5-33-2009
container_title Climate of the Past
container_volume 5
container_issue 1
container_start_page 33
op_container_end_page 51
_version_ 1766395958552166400