A multi-model assessment of the early last deglaciation (PMIP4 LDv1): a meltwater perspective

• Published in: Climate of the Past
• Main Authors: Snoll, Brooke, Ivanovic, Ruza, Gregoire, Lauren, Sherriff-Tadano, Sam, Menviel, Laurie, Obase, Takashi, Abe-Ouchi, Ayako, Bouttes, Nathaelle, He, Chengfei, He, Feng, Kapsch, Marie, Mikolajewicz, Uwe, Muglia, Juan, Valdes, Paul
• Format: Text
• Language: English
• Published: 2024
• Subjects: Endeavour; Ice Sheet; North Atlantic
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-789-2024; https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/20/789/2024/

The last deglaciation ( ∼20 –11 ka BP) is a period of a major, long-term climate transition from a glacial to interglacial state that features multiple centennial- to decadal-scale abrupt climate variations whose root cause is still not fully understood. To better understand this time period, the Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project (PMIP) has provided a framework for an internationally coordinated endeavour in simulating the last deglaciation whilst encompassing a broad range of models. Here, we present a multi-model intercomparison of 17 transient simulations of the early part of the last deglaciation ( ∼20 –15 ka BP) from nine different climate models spanning a range of model complexities and uncertain boundary conditions and forcings. The numerous simulations available provide the opportunity to better understand the chain of events and mechanisms of climate changes between 20 and 15 ka BP and our collective ability to simulate them. We conclude that the amount of freshwater forcing and whether it follows the ice sheet reconstruction or induces an inferred Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) history, heavily impacts the deglacial climate evolution for each simulation rather than differences in the model physics. The course of the deglaciation is consistent between simulations except when the freshwater forcing is above 0.1 Sv – at least 70 % of the simulations agree that there is warming by 15 ka BP in most places excluding the location of meltwater input. For simulations with freshwater forcings that exceed 0.1 Sv from 18 ka BP, warming is delayed in the North Atlantic and surface air temperature correlations with AMOC strength are much higher. However, we find that the state of the AMOC coming out of the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) also plays a key role in the AMOC sensitivity to model forcings. In addition, we show that the response of each model to the chosen meltwater scenario depends largely on the sensitivity of the model to the freshwater forcing and other aspects of the ...