Moist moss tundra on Kapp Linne, Svalbard is a net source of CO2 and CH4 to the atmosphere

We measured CO 2 and CH 4 fluxes using chambers and eddy covariance (only CO 2 ) from a moist moss tundra in Svalbard. The average net ecosystem exchange (NEE) during the summer (June–August) was −0.40 g C m −2 day −1 or −37 g C m −2 for the whole summer. Including spring and autumn periods the NEE...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lindroth, Anders, Pirk, Norbert, Jónsdóttir, Ingibjörg S., Stiegler, Christian, Klemedtsson, Leif, Nilsson, Mats
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2021-308
https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/bg-2021-308/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:bgd99126
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:bgd99126 2023-05-15T15:13:42+02:00 Moist moss tundra on Kapp Linne, Svalbard is a net source of CO2 and CH4 to the atmosphere Lindroth, Anders Pirk, Norbert Jónsdóttir, Ingibjörg S. Stiegler, Christian Klemedtsson, Leif Nilsson, Mats 2021-12-08 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2021-308 https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/bg-2021-308/ eng eng doi:10.5194/bg-2021-308 https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/bg-2021-308/ eISSN: 1726-4189 Text 2021 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2021-308 2021-12-13T17:22:30Z We measured CO 2 and CH 4 fluxes using chambers and eddy covariance (only CO 2 ) from a moist moss tundra in Svalbard. The average net ecosystem exchange (NEE) during the summer (June–August) was −0.40 g C m −2 day −1 or −37 g C m −2 for the whole summer. Including spring and autumn periods the NEE was reduced to −6.8 g C m −2 and the annual NEE became positive, 24.7 gC m −2 due to the losses during the winter. The CH 4 flux during the summer period showed a large spatial and temporal variability. The mean value of all 214 samples was 0.000511 ± 0.000315 µmol m −2 s −1 which corresponds to a growing season estimate of 0.04 to 0.16 g CH 4 m −2 . We find that this moss tundra emits about 94–100 g CO 2 -equivalents m −2 yr −1 of which CH 4 is responsible for 3.5–9.3 % using GWP 100 of 27.9 respectively GWP 20 . Air temperature, soil moisture and greenness index contributed significantly to explain the variation in ecosystem respiration (R eco ) while active layer depth, soil moisture and greenness index were the variables that best explained CH 4 emissions. Estimate of temperature sensitivity of R eco and gross primary productivity showed that a modest increase in air temperature of 1 degree did not significantly change the NEE during the growing season but that the annual NEE would be even more positive adding another 8.5 g C m −2 to the atmosphere. We tentatively suggest that the warming of the Arctic that has already taken place is partly responsible for the fact that the moist moss tundra now is a source of CO 2 to the atmosphere. Text Arctic Svalbard Tundra Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Arctic Svalbard
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description We measured CO 2 and CH 4 fluxes using chambers and eddy covariance (only CO 2 ) from a moist moss tundra in Svalbard. The average net ecosystem exchange (NEE) during the summer (June–August) was −0.40 g C m −2 day −1 or −37 g C m −2 for the whole summer. Including spring and autumn periods the NEE was reduced to −6.8 g C m −2 and the annual NEE became positive, 24.7 gC m −2 due to the losses during the winter. The CH 4 flux during the summer period showed a large spatial and temporal variability. The mean value of all 214 samples was 0.000511 ± 0.000315 µmol m −2 s −1 which corresponds to a growing season estimate of 0.04 to 0.16 g CH 4 m −2 . We find that this moss tundra emits about 94–100 g CO 2 -equivalents m −2 yr −1 of which CH 4 is responsible for 3.5–9.3 % using GWP 100 of 27.9 respectively GWP 20 . Air temperature, soil moisture and greenness index contributed significantly to explain the variation in ecosystem respiration (R eco ) while active layer depth, soil moisture and greenness index were the variables that best explained CH 4 emissions. Estimate of temperature sensitivity of R eco and gross primary productivity showed that a modest increase in air temperature of 1 degree did not significantly change the NEE during the growing season but that the annual NEE would be even more positive adding another 8.5 g C m −2 to the atmosphere. We tentatively suggest that the warming of the Arctic that has already taken place is partly responsible for the fact that the moist moss tundra now is a source of CO 2 to the atmosphere.
format Text
author Lindroth, Anders
Pirk, Norbert
Jónsdóttir, Ingibjörg S.
Stiegler, Christian
Klemedtsson, Leif
Nilsson, Mats
spellingShingle Lindroth, Anders
Pirk, Norbert
Jónsdóttir, Ingibjörg S.
Stiegler, Christian
Klemedtsson, Leif
Nilsson, Mats
Moist moss tundra on Kapp Linne, Svalbard is a net source of CO2 and CH4 to the atmosphere
author_facet Lindroth, Anders
Pirk, Norbert
Jónsdóttir, Ingibjörg S.
Stiegler, Christian
Klemedtsson, Leif
Nilsson, Mats
author_sort Lindroth, Anders
title Moist moss tundra on Kapp Linne, Svalbard is a net source of CO2 and CH4 to the atmosphere
title_short Moist moss tundra on Kapp Linne, Svalbard is a net source of CO2 and CH4 to the atmosphere
title_full Moist moss tundra on Kapp Linne, Svalbard is a net source of CO2 and CH4 to the atmosphere
title_fullStr Moist moss tundra on Kapp Linne, Svalbard is a net source of CO2 and CH4 to the atmosphere
title_full_unstemmed Moist moss tundra on Kapp Linne, Svalbard is a net source of CO2 and CH4 to the atmosphere
title_sort moist moss tundra on kapp linne, svalbard is a net source of co2 and ch4 to the atmosphere
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2021-308
https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/bg-2021-308/
geographic Arctic
Svalbard
geographic_facet Arctic
Svalbard
genre Arctic
Svalbard
Tundra
genre_facet Arctic
Svalbard
Tundra
op_source eISSN: 1726-4189
op_relation doi:10.5194/bg-2021-308
https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/bg-2021-308/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2021-308
_version_ 1766344228226465792