Arctic Ocean acidification over the 21st century co-driven by anthropogenic carbon increases and freshening in the CMIP6 model ensemble

The uptake of anthropogenic carbon (C ant ) by the ocean leads to ocean acidification, causing the reduction of pH and the calcium carbonate saturation states of aragonite (Ω arag ) and calcite (Ω calc ). The Arctic Ocean is particularly vulnerable to ocean acidification due to its naturally low pH...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Terhaar, Jens, Torres, Olivier, Bourgeois, Timothée, Kwiatkowski, Lester
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2020-456
https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/bg-2020-456/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:bgd91620
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:bgd91620 2023-05-15T14:33:37+02:00 Arctic Ocean acidification over the 21st century co-driven by anthropogenic carbon increases and freshening in the CMIP6 model ensemble Terhaar, Jens Torres, Olivier Bourgeois, Timothée Kwiatkowski, Lester 2020-12-17 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2020-456 https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/bg-2020-456/ eng eng doi:10.5194/bg-2020-456 https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/bg-2020-456/ eISSN: 1726-4189 Text 2020 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2020-456 2020-12-21T17:22:13Z The uptake of anthropogenic carbon (C ant ) by the ocean leads to ocean acidification, causing the reduction of pH and the calcium carbonate saturation states of aragonite (Ω arag ) and calcite (Ω calc ). The Arctic Ocean is particularly vulnerable to ocean acidification due to its naturally low pH and saturation states and due to ongoing freshening and the concurrent reduction in alkalinity in this region. Here, we analyse ocean acidification in the Arctic Ocean over the 21 st century across 14 Earth System Models (ESMs) from the latest Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). Compared to the previous model generation (CMIP5), the inter-model uncertainty of projected end-of-century Arctic Ocean Ω arag/calc is reduced by 44–64 %. The strong reduction in projection uncertainties of Ω arag/calc can be attributed to compensation between C ant uptake and alkalinity reduction in the latest models. Specifically, ESMs with a large increase in Arctic Ocean C ant over the 21 st century tend to simulate a relatively weak concurrent freshening and alkalinity reduction, while ESMs with a small increase in C ant simulate a relatively strong freshening and concurrent alkalinity reduction. Although both mechanisms contribute to Arctic Ocean acidification over the 21 st century, the increase in C ant remains the dominant driver. Even under the low-emissions shared socioeconomic pathway SSP1-2.6, basin-wide averaged arag undersaturation occurs before the end of the century. While under the high-emissions pathway SSP5-8.5, the Arctic Ocean mesopelagic is projected to even become undersaturated with respect to calcite. An emergent constraint, identified in CMIP5, which relates present-day maximum sea surface densities in the Arctic Ocean to the projected end-of-century Arctic Ocean C ant inventory, is found to generally hold in CMIP6. However, a coincident constraint on Arctic declines in Ω arag/calc is not apparent in the new generation of models. This is due to both the reduction in Ω arag/calc projection uncertainty and the weaker direct relationship between projected changes in Arctic Ocean C ant and arag/calc. In CMIP6, models generally better simulate maximum sea surface densities in the Arctic Ocean and consequently the transport of C ant into the Arctic Ocean interior, with simulated historical increases in C ant in improved agreement with observational products. Text Arctic Arctic Ocean Arctic Ocean Acidification Ocean acidification Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Arctic Arctic Ocean
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description The uptake of anthropogenic carbon (C ant ) by the ocean leads to ocean acidification, causing the reduction of pH and the calcium carbonate saturation states of aragonite (Ω arag ) and calcite (Ω calc ). The Arctic Ocean is particularly vulnerable to ocean acidification due to its naturally low pH and saturation states and due to ongoing freshening and the concurrent reduction in alkalinity in this region. Here, we analyse ocean acidification in the Arctic Ocean over the 21 st century across 14 Earth System Models (ESMs) from the latest Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). Compared to the previous model generation (CMIP5), the inter-model uncertainty of projected end-of-century Arctic Ocean Ω arag/calc is reduced by 44–64 %. The strong reduction in projection uncertainties of Ω arag/calc can be attributed to compensation between C ant uptake and alkalinity reduction in the latest models. Specifically, ESMs with a large increase in Arctic Ocean C ant over the 21 st century tend to simulate a relatively weak concurrent freshening and alkalinity reduction, while ESMs with a small increase in C ant simulate a relatively strong freshening and concurrent alkalinity reduction. Although both mechanisms contribute to Arctic Ocean acidification over the 21 st century, the increase in C ant remains the dominant driver. Even under the low-emissions shared socioeconomic pathway SSP1-2.6, basin-wide averaged arag undersaturation occurs before the end of the century. While under the high-emissions pathway SSP5-8.5, the Arctic Ocean mesopelagic is projected to even become undersaturated with respect to calcite. An emergent constraint, identified in CMIP5, which relates present-day maximum sea surface densities in the Arctic Ocean to the projected end-of-century Arctic Ocean C ant inventory, is found to generally hold in CMIP6. However, a coincident constraint on Arctic declines in Ω arag/calc is not apparent in the new generation of models. This is due to both the reduction in Ω arag/calc projection uncertainty and the weaker direct relationship between projected changes in Arctic Ocean C ant and arag/calc. In CMIP6, models generally better simulate maximum sea surface densities in the Arctic Ocean and consequently the transport of C ant into the Arctic Ocean interior, with simulated historical increases in C ant in improved agreement with observational products.
format Text
author Terhaar, Jens
Torres, Olivier
Bourgeois, Timothée
Kwiatkowski, Lester
spellingShingle Terhaar, Jens
Torres, Olivier
Bourgeois, Timothée
Kwiatkowski, Lester
Arctic Ocean acidification over the 21st century co-driven by anthropogenic carbon increases and freshening in the CMIP6 model ensemble
author_facet Terhaar, Jens
Torres, Olivier
Bourgeois, Timothée
Kwiatkowski, Lester
author_sort Terhaar, Jens
title Arctic Ocean acidification over the 21st century co-driven by anthropogenic carbon increases and freshening in the CMIP6 model ensemble
title_short Arctic Ocean acidification over the 21st century co-driven by anthropogenic carbon increases and freshening in the CMIP6 model ensemble
title_full Arctic Ocean acidification over the 21st century co-driven by anthropogenic carbon increases and freshening in the CMIP6 model ensemble
title_fullStr Arctic Ocean acidification over the 21st century co-driven by anthropogenic carbon increases and freshening in the CMIP6 model ensemble
title_full_unstemmed Arctic Ocean acidification over the 21st century co-driven by anthropogenic carbon increases and freshening in the CMIP6 model ensemble
title_sort arctic ocean acidification over the 21st century co-driven by anthropogenic carbon increases and freshening in the cmip6 model ensemble
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2020-456
https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/bg-2020-456/
geographic Arctic
Arctic Ocean
geographic_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
genre Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Arctic Ocean Acidification
Ocean acidification
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Arctic Ocean Acidification
Ocean acidification
op_source eISSN: 1726-4189
op_relation doi:10.5194/bg-2020-456
https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/bg-2020-456/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2020-456
_version_ 1766306820632084480