Interannual drivers of the seasonal cycle of CO2 in the Southern Ocean

• Published in: Biogeosciences
• Main Authors: Gregor, Luke, Kok, Schalk, Monteiro, Pedro M. S.
• Format: Text
• Language: English
• Published: 2018
• Subjects: Indian; Pacific; Southern Ocean
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-2361-2018; https://www.biogeosciences.net/15/2361/2018/

Resolving and understanding the drivers of variability of CO 2 in the Southern Ocean and its potential climate feedback is one of the major scientific challenges of the ocean-climate community. Here we use a regional approach on empirical estimates of p CO 2 to understand the role that seasonal variability has in long-term CO 2 changes in the Southern Ocean. Machine learning has become the preferred empirical modelling tool to interpolate time- and location-restricted ship measurements of p CO 2 . In this study we use an ensemble of three machine-learning products: support vector regression (SVR) and random forest regression (RFR) from Gregor et al. (2017), and the self-organising-map feed-forward neural network (SOM-FFN) method from Landschützer et al. (2016). The interpolated estimates of Δ p CO 2 are separated into nine regions in the Southern Ocean defined by basin (Indian, Pacific, and Atlantic) and biomes (as defined by Fay and McKinley, 2014a). The regional approach shows that, while there is good agreement in the overall trend of the products, there are periods and regions where the confidence in estimated Δ p CO 2 is low due to disagreement between the products. The regional breakdown of the data highlighted the seasonal decoupling of the modes for summer and winter interannual variability. Winter interannual variability had a longer mode of variability compared to summer, which varied on a 4–6-year timescale. We separate the analysis of the Δ p CO 2 and its drivers into summer and winter. We find that understanding the variability of Δ p CO 2 and its drivers on shorter timescales is critical to resolving the long-term variability of Δ p CO 2 . Results show that Δ p CO 2 is rarely driven by thermodynamics during winter, but rather by mixing and stratification due to the stronger correlation of Δ p CO 2 variability with mixed layer depth. Summer p CO 2 variability is consistent with chlorophyll a variability, where higher concentrations of chlorophyll a correspond with lower p CO 2 concentrations. In regions of low chlorophyll a concentrations, wind stress and sea surface temperature emerged as stronger drivers of Δ p CO 2 . In summary we propose that sub-decadal variability is explained by summer drivers, while winter variability contributes to the long-term changes associated with the SAM. This approach is a useful framework to assess the drivers of Δ p CO 2 but would greatly benefit from improved estimates of Δ p CO 2 and a longer time series.