Environmental conditions for alternative tree-cover states in high latitudes

Previous analysis of the vegetation cover from remote sensing revealed the existence of three alternative modes in the frequency distribution of boreal tree cover: a sparsely vegetated treeless state, an open woodland state, and a forest state. Identifying which are the regions subject to multimodal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biogeosciences
Main Authors: Abis, Beniamino, Brovkin, Victor
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-511-2017
https://www.biogeosciences.net/14/511/2017/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:bg54830
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:bg54830 2023-05-15T17:57:31+02:00 Environmental conditions for alternative tree-cover states in high latitudes Abis, Beniamino Brovkin, Victor 2018-09-27 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-511-2017 https://www.biogeosciences.net/14/511/2017/ eng eng doi:10.5194/bg-14-511-2017 https://www.biogeosciences.net/14/511/2017/ eISSN: 1726-4189 Text 2018 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-511-2017 2019-12-24T09:51:40Z Previous analysis of the vegetation cover from remote sensing revealed the existence of three alternative modes in the frequency distribution of boreal tree cover: a sparsely vegetated treeless state, an open woodland state, and a forest state. Identifying which are the regions subject to multimodality, and assessing which are the main factors underlying their existence, is important to project future change of natural vegetation cover and its effect on climate. We study the link between the tree-cover fraction distribution and eight globally observed environmental factors: mean annual rainfall, mean minimum temperature, growing degree days above 0 °C, permafrost distribution, mean spring soil moisture, wildfire occurrence frequency, soil texture, and mean thawing depth. Through the use of generalised additive models, conditional histograms, and phase-space analysis, we find that environmental conditions exert a strong control over the tree-cover distribution, uniquely determining its state among the three dominant modes in ∼ 95 % of the cases. Additionally, we find that the link between individual environmental variables and tree cover is different within the four boreal regions considered here, namely eastern North Eurasia, western North Eurasia, eastern North America, and western North America. Furthermore, using a classification based on rainfall, minimum temperatures, permafrost distribution, soil moisture, wildfire frequency, and soil texture, we show the location of areas with potentially alternative tree-cover states under the same environmental conditions in the boreal region. These areas, although encompassing a minor fraction of the boreal area ( ∼ 5 %), correspond to possible transition zones with a reduced resilience to disturbances. Hence, they are of interest for a more detailed analysis of land–atmosphere interactions. Text permafrost Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Biogeosciences 14 3 511 527
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description Previous analysis of the vegetation cover from remote sensing revealed the existence of three alternative modes in the frequency distribution of boreal tree cover: a sparsely vegetated treeless state, an open woodland state, and a forest state. Identifying which are the regions subject to multimodality, and assessing which are the main factors underlying their existence, is important to project future change of natural vegetation cover and its effect on climate. We study the link between the tree-cover fraction distribution and eight globally observed environmental factors: mean annual rainfall, mean minimum temperature, growing degree days above 0 °C, permafrost distribution, mean spring soil moisture, wildfire occurrence frequency, soil texture, and mean thawing depth. Through the use of generalised additive models, conditional histograms, and phase-space analysis, we find that environmental conditions exert a strong control over the tree-cover distribution, uniquely determining its state among the three dominant modes in ∼ 95 % of the cases. Additionally, we find that the link between individual environmental variables and tree cover is different within the four boreal regions considered here, namely eastern North Eurasia, western North Eurasia, eastern North America, and western North America. Furthermore, using a classification based on rainfall, minimum temperatures, permafrost distribution, soil moisture, wildfire frequency, and soil texture, we show the location of areas with potentially alternative tree-cover states under the same environmental conditions in the boreal region. These areas, although encompassing a minor fraction of the boreal area ( ∼ 5 %), correspond to possible transition zones with a reduced resilience to disturbances. Hence, they are of interest for a more detailed analysis of land–atmosphere interactions.
format Text
author Abis, Beniamino
Brovkin, Victor
spellingShingle Abis, Beniamino
Brovkin, Victor
Environmental conditions for alternative tree-cover states in high latitudes
author_facet Abis, Beniamino
Brovkin, Victor
author_sort Abis, Beniamino
title Environmental conditions for alternative tree-cover states in high latitudes
title_short Environmental conditions for alternative tree-cover states in high latitudes
title_full Environmental conditions for alternative tree-cover states in high latitudes
title_fullStr Environmental conditions for alternative tree-cover states in high latitudes
title_full_unstemmed Environmental conditions for alternative tree-cover states in high latitudes
title_sort environmental conditions for alternative tree-cover states in high latitudes
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-511-2017
https://www.biogeosciences.net/14/511/2017/
genre permafrost
genre_facet permafrost
op_source eISSN: 1726-4189
op_relation doi:10.5194/bg-14-511-2017
https://www.biogeosciences.net/14/511/2017/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-511-2017
container_title Biogeosciences
container_volume 14
container_issue 3
container_start_page 511
op_container_end_page 527
_version_ 1766165978085851136