Photosynthesis–irradiance responses in the Ross Sea, Antarctica: a meta-analysis
A meta-analysis of photosynthesis–irradiance measurements was completed using data from the Ross Sea, Antarctica, using a total of 417 independent measurements. P m B , the maximum, chlorophyll-specific, irradiance-saturated rate of photosynthesis, averaged 1.1 ± 0.06 μg C (μg Chl) −1 h −1 . Light-l...
Published in: | Biogeosciences |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-3567-2015 https://www.biogeosciences.net/12/3567/2015/ |
id |
ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:bg27861 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:bg27861 2023-05-15T13:43:09+02:00 Photosynthesis–irradiance responses in the Ross Sea, Antarctica: a meta-analysis Smith, W. O. Donaldson, K. 2018-09-27 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-3567-2015 https://www.biogeosciences.net/12/3567/2015/ eng eng doi:10.5194/bg-12-3567-2015 https://www.biogeosciences.net/12/3567/2015/ eISSN: 1726-4189 Text 2018 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-3567-2015 2019-12-24T09:53:24Z A meta-analysis of photosynthesis–irradiance measurements was completed using data from the Ross Sea, Antarctica, using a total of 417 independent measurements. P m B , the maximum, chlorophyll-specific, irradiance-saturated rate of photosynthesis, averaged 1.1 ± 0.06 μg C (μg Chl) −1 h −1 . Light-limited, chlorophyll-specific photosynthetic rates (α B ) averaged 0.030 ± 0.023 μg C (μg Chl) −1 h −1 (μmol quanta m −2 s −1 ) −1 . Significant variations in P m B and α B were found as a function of season, with spring maximum photosynthetic rates being 60% greater than those in summer. Similarly, α values were 48% greater in spring. There was no detectable effect of sampling location on the photo-synthetic parameters, and temperature and macronutrient (NO 3 ) concentrations also did not have an influence. However, irradiance and carbon dioxide concentrations, when altered under controlled conditions, exerted significant influences on photosynthetic parameters. Specifically, reduced irradiance resulted in significantly decreased P m B and increased α B values, and increased CO 2 concentrations resulted in significantly increased P m B and α B values. Comparison of photosynthetic parameters derived at stations where iron concentrations were above and below 0.1 nM indicated that reduced iron levels were associated with significantly increased P m B values, confirming the importance of iron within the photosynthetic process. No significant difference was detected between stations dominated by diatoms and those dominated by the haptophyte Phaeocystis antarctica . The meta-analysis confirms the photosynthetic rates predicted from global analyses that are based solely on temperature and irradiance availability, but suggests that, for more accurate predictions of productivity in polar systems, a more detailed model that includes temporal effects of photosynthetic parameters will be required. Text Antarc* Antarctica Ross Sea Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Ross Sea Biogeosciences 12 11 3567 3577 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Copernicus Publications: E-Journals |
op_collection_id |
ftcopernicus |
language |
English |
description |
A meta-analysis of photosynthesis–irradiance measurements was completed using data from the Ross Sea, Antarctica, using a total of 417 independent measurements. P m B , the maximum, chlorophyll-specific, irradiance-saturated rate of photosynthesis, averaged 1.1 ± 0.06 μg C (μg Chl) −1 h −1 . Light-limited, chlorophyll-specific photosynthetic rates (α B ) averaged 0.030 ± 0.023 μg C (μg Chl) −1 h −1 (μmol quanta m −2 s −1 ) −1 . Significant variations in P m B and α B were found as a function of season, with spring maximum photosynthetic rates being 60% greater than those in summer. Similarly, α values were 48% greater in spring. There was no detectable effect of sampling location on the photo-synthetic parameters, and temperature and macronutrient (NO 3 ) concentrations also did not have an influence. However, irradiance and carbon dioxide concentrations, when altered under controlled conditions, exerted significant influences on photosynthetic parameters. Specifically, reduced irradiance resulted in significantly decreased P m B and increased α B values, and increased CO 2 concentrations resulted in significantly increased P m B and α B values. Comparison of photosynthetic parameters derived at stations where iron concentrations were above and below 0.1 nM indicated that reduced iron levels were associated with significantly increased P m B values, confirming the importance of iron within the photosynthetic process. No significant difference was detected between stations dominated by diatoms and those dominated by the haptophyte Phaeocystis antarctica . The meta-analysis confirms the photosynthetic rates predicted from global analyses that are based solely on temperature and irradiance availability, but suggests that, for more accurate predictions of productivity in polar systems, a more detailed model that includes temporal effects of photosynthetic parameters will be required. |
format |
Text |
author |
Smith, W. O. Donaldson, K. |
spellingShingle |
Smith, W. O. Donaldson, K. Photosynthesis–irradiance responses in the Ross Sea, Antarctica: a meta-analysis |
author_facet |
Smith, W. O. Donaldson, K. |
author_sort |
Smith, W. O. |
title |
Photosynthesis–irradiance responses in the Ross Sea, Antarctica: a meta-analysis |
title_short |
Photosynthesis–irradiance responses in the Ross Sea, Antarctica: a meta-analysis |
title_full |
Photosynthesis–irradiance responses in the Ross Sea, Antarctica: a meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Photosynthesis–irradiance responses in the Ross Sea, Antarctica: a meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Photosynthesis–irradiance responses in the Ross Sea, Antarctica: a meta-analysis |
title_sort |
photosynthesis–irradiance responses in the ross sea, antarctica: a meta-analysis |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-3567-2015 https://www.biogeosciences.net/12/3567/2015/ |
geographic |
Ross Sea |
geographic_facet |
Ross Sea |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctica Ross Sea |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctica Ross Sea |
op_source |
eISSN: 1726-4189 |
op_relation |
doi:10.5194/bg-12-3567-2015 https://www.biogeosciences.net/12/3567/2015/ |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-3567-2015 |
container_title |
Biogeosciences |
container_volume |
12 |
container_issue |
11 |
container_start_page |
3567 |
op_container_end_page |
3577 |
_version_ |
1766185287729283072 |