Photosynthesis–irradiance responses in the Ross Sea, Antarctica: a meta-analysis

A meta-analysis of photosynthesis–irradiance measurements was completed using data from the Ross Sea, Antarctica, using a total of 417 independent measurements. P m B , the maximum, chlorophyll-specific, irradiance-saturated rate of photosynthesis, averaged 1.1 ± 0.06 μg C (μg Chl) −1 h −1 . Light-l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biogeosciences
Main Authors: Smith, W. O., Donaldson, K.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-3567-2015
https://www.biogeosciences.net/12/3567/2015/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:bg27861
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:bg27861 2023-05-15T13:43:09+02:00 Photosynthesis–irradiance responses in the Ross Sea, Antarctica: a meta-analysis Smith, W. O. Donaldson, K. 2018-09-27 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-3567-2015 https://www.biogeosciences.net/12/3567/2015/ eng eng doi:10.5194/bg-12-3567-2015 https://www.biogeosciences.net/12/3567/2015/ eISSN: 1726-4189 Text 2018 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-3567-2015 2019-12-24T09:53:24Z A meta-analysis of photosynthesis–irradiance measurements was completed using data from the Ross Sea, Antarctica, using a total of 417 independent measurements. P m B , the maximum, chlorophyll-specific, irradiance-saturated rate of photosynthesis, averaged 1.1 ± 0.06 μg C (μg Chl) −1 h −1 . Light-limited, chlorophyll-specific photosynthetic rates (α B ) averaged 0.030 ± 0.023 μg C (μg Chl) −1 h −1 (μmol quanta m −2 s −1 ) −1 . Significant variations in P m B and α B were found as a function of season, with spring maximum photosynthetic rates being 60% greater than those in summer. Similarly, α values were 48% greater in spring. There was no detectable effect of sampling location on the photo-synthetic parameters, and temperature and macronutrient (NO 3 ) concentrations also did not have an influence. However, irradiance and carbon dioxide concentrations, when altered under controlled conditions, exerted significant influences on photosynthetic parameters. Specifically, reduced irradiance resulted in significantly decreased P m B and increased α B values, and increased CO 2 concentrations resulted in significantly increased P m B and α B values. Comparison of photosynthetic parameters derived at stations where iron concentrations were above and below 0.1 nM indicated that reduced iron levels were associated with significantly increased P m B values, confirming the importance of iron within the photosynthetic process. No significant difference was detected between stations dominated by diatoms and those dominated by the haptophyte Phaeocystis antarctica . The meta-analysis confirms the photosynthetic rates predicted from global analyses that are based solely on temperature and irradiance availability, but suggests that, for more accurate predictions of productivity in polar systems, a more detailed model that includes temporal effects of photosynthetic parameters will be required. Text Antarc* Antarctica Ross Sea Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Ross Sea Biogeosciences 12 11 3567 3577
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description A meta-analysis of photosynthesis–irradiance measurements was completed using data from the Ross Sea, Antarctica, using a total of 417 independent measurements. P m B , the maximum, chlorophyll-specific, irradiance-saturated rate of photosynthesis, averaged 1.1 ± 0.06 μg C (μg Chl) −1 h −1 . Light-limited, chlorophyll-specific photosynthetic rates (α B ) averaged 0.030 ± 0.023 μg C (μg Chl) −1 h −1 (μmol quanta m −2 s −1 ) −1 . Significant variations in P m B and α B were found as a function of season, with spring maximum photosynthetic rates being 60% greater than those in summer. Similarly, α values were 48% greater in spring. There was no detectable effect of sampling location on the photo-synthetic parameters, and temperature and macronutrient (NO 3 ) concentrations also did not have an influence. However, irradiance and carbon dioxide concentrations, when altered under controlled conditions, exerted significant influences on photosynthetic parameters. Specifically, reduced irradiance resulted in significantly decreased P m B and increased α B values, and increased CO 2 concentrations resulted in significantly increased P m B and α B values. Comparison of photosynthetic parameters derived at stations where iron concentrations were above and below 0.1 nM indicated that reduced iron levels were associated with significantly increased P m B values, confirming the importance of iron within the photosynthetic process. No significant difference was detected between stations dominated by diatoms and those dominated by the haptophyte Phaeocystis antarctica . The meta-analysis confirms the photosynthetic rates predicted from global analyses that are based solely on temperature and irradiance availability, but suggests that, for more accurate predictions of productivity in polar systems, a more detailed model that includes temporal effects of photosynthetic parameters will be required.
format Text
author Smith, W. O.
Donaldson, K.
spellingShingle Smith, W. O.
Donaldson, K.
Photosynthesis–irradiance responses in the Ross Sea, Antarctica: a meta-analysis
author_facet Smith, W. O.
Donaldson, K.
author_sort Smith, W. O.
title Photosynthesis–irradiance responses in the Ross Sea, Antarctica: a meta-analysis
title_short Photosynthesis–irradiance responses in the Ross Sea, Antarctica: a meta-analysis
title_full Photosynthesis–irradiance responses in the Ross Sea, Antarctica: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Photosynthesis–irradiance responses in the Ross Sea, Antarctica: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Photosynthesis–irradiance responses in the Ross Sea, Antarctica: a meta-analysis
title_sort photosynthesis–irradiance responses in the ross sea, antarctica: a meta-analysis
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-3567-2015
https://www.biogeosciences.net/12/3567/2015/
geographic Ross Sea
geographic_facet Ross Sea
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
Ross Sea
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
Ross Sea
op_source eISSN: 1726-4189
op_relation doi:10.5194/bg-12-3567-2015
https://www.biogeosciences.net/12/3567/2015/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-3567-2015
container_title Biogeosciences
container_volume 12
container_issue 11
container_start_page 3567
op_container_end_page 3577
_version_ 1766185287729283072