Sensitivity analysis of a wetland methane emission model based on temperate and arctic wetland sites

Modelling of wetland CH 4 fluxes using wetland soil emission models is used to determine the size of this natural source of CH 4 emission on local to global scale. Most process models of CH 4 formation and soil-atmosphere CH 4 transport processes operate on a plot scale. For large scale emission mod...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biogeosciences
Main Authors: Huissteden, J., Petrescu, A. M. R., Hendriks, D. M. D., Rebel, K. T.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-3035-2009
https://www.biogeosciences.net/6/3035/2009/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:bg1670
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:bg1670 2023-05-15T15:00:39+02:00 Sensitivity analysis of a wetland methane emission model based on temperate and arctic wetland sites Huissteden, J. Petrescu, A. M. R. Hendriks, D. M. D. Rebel, K. T. 2018-09-27 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-3035-2009 https://www.biogeosciences.net/6/3035/2009/ eng eng doi:10.5194/bg-6-3035-2009 https://www.biogeosciences.net/6/3035/2009/ eISSN: 1726-4189 Text 2018 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-3035-2009 2019-12-24T09:57:35Z Modelling of wetland CH 4 fluxes using wetland soil emission models is used to determine the size of this natural source of CH 4 emission on local to global scale. Most process models of CH 4 formation and soil-atmosphere CH 4 transport processes operate on a plot scale. For large scale emission modelling (regional to global scale) upscaling of this type of model requires thorough analysis of the sensitivity of these models to parameter uncertainty. We applied the GLUE (Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Analysis) methodology to a well-known CH 4 emission model, the Walter-Heimann model, as implemented in the PEATLAND-VU model. The model is tested using data from two temperate wetland sites and one arctic site. The tests include experiments with different objective functions, which quantify the fit of the model results to the data. The results indicate that the model 1) in most cases is capable of estimating CH 4 fluxes better than an estimate based on the data avarage, but does not clearly outcompete a regression model based on local data; 2) is capable of reproducing larger scale (seasonal) temporal variability in the data, but not the small-scale (daily) temporal variability; 3) is not strongly sensitive to soil parameters, 4) is sensitive to parameters determining CH 4 transport and oxidation in vegetation, and the temperature sensitivity of the microbial population. The GLUE method also allowed testing of several smaller modifications of the original model. We conclude that upscaling of this plot-based wetland CH 4 emission model is feasible, but considerable improvements of wetland CH 4 modelling will result from improvement of wetland vegetation data. Text Arctic Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Arctic Biogeosciences 6 12 3035 3051
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description Modelling of wetland CH 4 fluxes using wetland soil emission models is used to determine the size of this natural source of CH 4 emission on local to global scale. Most process models of CH 4 formation and soil-atmosphere CH 4 transport processes operate on a plot scale. For large scale emission modelling (regional to global scale) upscaling of this type of model requires thorough analysis of the sensitivity of these models to parameter uncertainty. We applied the GLUE (Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Analysis) methodology to a well-known CH 4 emission model, the Walter-Heimann model, as implemented in the PEATLAND-VU model. The model is tested using data from two temperate wetland sites and one arctic site. The tests include experiments with different objective functions, which quantify the fit of the model results to the data. The results indicate that the model 1) in most cases is capable of estimating CH 4 fluxes better than an estimate based on the data avarage, but does not clearly outcompete a regression model based on local data; 2) is capable of reproducing larger scale (seasonal) temporal variability in the data, but not the small-scale (daily) temporal variability; 3) is not strongly sensitive to soil parameters, 4) is sensitive to parameters determining CH 4 transport and oxidation in vegetation, and the temperature sensitivity of the microbial population. The GLUE method also allowed testing of several smaller modifications of the original model. We conclude that upscaling of this plot-based wetland CH 4 emission model is feasible, but considerable improvements of wetland CH 4 modelling will result from improvement of wetland vegetation data.
format Text
author Huissteden, J.
Petrescu, A. M. R.
Hendriks, D. M. D.
Rebel, K. T.
spellingShingle Huissteden, J.
Petrescu, A. M. R.
Hendriks, D. M. D.
Rebel, K. T.
Sensitivity analysis of a wetland methane emission model based on temperate and arctic wetland sites
author_facet Huissteden, J.
Petrescu, A. M. R.
Hendriks, D. M. D.
Rebel, K. T.
author_sort Huissteden, J.
title Sensitivity analysis of a wetland methane emission model based on temperate and arctic wetland sites
title_short Sensitivity analysis of a wetland methane emission model based on temperate and arctic wetland sites
title_full Sensitivity analysis of a wetland methane emission model based on temperate and arctic wetland sites
title_fullStr Sensitivity analysis of a wetland methane emission model based on temperate and arctic wetland sites
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity analysis of a wetland methane emission model based on temperate and arctic wetland sites
title_sort sensitivity analysis of a wetland methane emission model based on temperate and arctic wetland sites
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-3035-2009
https://www.biogeosciences.net/6/3035/2009/
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source eISSN: 1726-4189
op_relation doi:10.5194/bg-6-3035-2009
https://www.biogeosciences.net/6/3035/2009/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-3035-2009
container_title Biogeosciences
container_volume 6
container_issue 12
container_start_page 3035
op_container_end_page 3051
_version_ 1766332724923072512