Propagation of low frequency geomagnetic field fluctuations in Antarctica: comparison between two polar cap stations

We conduct a statistical analysis of the coherence and phase difference of low frequency geomagnetic fluctuations between two Antarctic stations, Mario Zucchelli Station (geographic coordinates: 74.7° S, 164.1° E; corrected geomagnetic coordinates: 80.0° S, 307.7° E) and Scott Base (geographic coord...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annales Geophysicae
Main Authors: Santarelli, L., Lepidi, S., Cafarella, L.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-25-2405-2007
https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/25/2405/2007/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:angeo36275
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:angeo36275 2023-05-15T13:36:36+02:00 Propagation of low frequency geomagnetic field fluctuations in Antarctica: comparison between two polar cap stations Santarelli, L. Lepidi, S. Cafarella, L. 2018-09-27 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-25-2405-2007 https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/25/2405/2007/ eng eng doi:10.5194/angeo-25-2405-2007 https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/25/2405/2007/ eISSN: 1432-0576 Text 2018 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-25-2405-2007 2020-07-20T16:26:58Z We conduct a statistical analysis of the coherence and phase difference of low frequency geomagnetic fluctuations between two Antarctic stations, Mario Zucchelli Station (geographic coordinates: 74.7° S, 164.1° E; corrected geomagnetic coordinates: 80.0° S, 307.7° E) and Scott Base (geographic coordinates: 77.8° S 166.8° E; corrected geomagnetic coordinates: 80.0° S 326.5° E), both located in the polar cap. Due to the relative position of the stations, whose displacement is essentially along a geomagnetic parallel, the phase difference analysis allows to determine the direction of azimuthal propagation of geomagnetic fluctuations. The results show that coherent fluctuations are essentially detectable around local geomagnetic midnight and, in a minor extent, around noon; moreover, the phase difference reverses in the night time hours, indicating a propagation direction away from midnight, and also around local geomagnetic noon, indicating a propagation direction away from the subsolar point. The nigh time phase reversal is more clear for southward interplanetary magnetic field conditions, suggesting a relation with substorm activity. The introduction, in this analysis, of the Interplanetary Magnetic Field conditions, gave interesting results, indicating a relation with substorm activity during nighttime hours. We also conducted a study of three individual pulsation events in order to find a correspondence with the statistical behaviour. In particular, a peculiar event, characterized by quiet magnetospheric and northward interplanetary magnetic field conditions, shows a clear example of waves propagating away from the local geomagnetic noon; two more events, occurring during southward interplanetary magnetic field conditions, in one case even during a moderate storm, show waves propagating away from the local geomagnetic midnight. Text Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Antarctic Mario Zucchelli ENVELOPE(164.123,164.123,-74.695,-74.695) Mario Zucchelli Station ENVELOPE(164.117,164.117,-74.700,-74.700) Scott Base ENVELOPE(166.766,166.766,-77.849,-77.849) Annales Geophysicae 25 11 2405 2412
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description We conduct a statistical analysis of the coherence and phase difference of low frequency geomagnetic fluctuations between two Antarctic stations, Mario Zucchelli Station (geographic coordinates: 74.7° S, 164.1° E; corrected geomagnetic coordinates: 80.0° S, 307.7° E) and Scott Base (geographic coordinates: 77.8° S 166.8° E; corrected geomagnetic coordinates: 80.0° S 326.5° E), both located in the polar cap. Due to the relative position of the stations, whose displacement is essentially along a geomagnetic parallel, the phase difference analysis allows to determine the direction of azimuthal propagation of geomagnetic fluctuations. The results show that coherent fluctuations are essentially detectable around local geomagnetic midnight and, in a minor extent, around noon; moreover, the phase difference reverses in the night time hours, indicating a propagation direction away from midnight, and also around local geomagnetic noon, indicating a propagation direction away from the subsolar point. The nigh time phase reversal is more clear for southward interplanetary magnetic field conditions, suggesting a relation with substorm activity. The introduction, in this analysis, of the Interplanetary Magnetic Field conditions, gave interesting results, indicating a relation with substorm activity during nighttime hours. We also conducted a study of three individual pulsation events in order to find a correspondence with the statistical behaviour. In particular, a peculiar event, characterized by quiet magnetospheric and northward interplanetary magnetic field conditions, shows a clear example of waves propagating away from the local geomagnetic noon; two more events, occurring during southward interplanetary magnetic field conditions, in one case even during a moderate storm, show waves propagating away from the local geomagnetic midnight.
format Text
author Santarelli, L.
Lepidi, S.
Cafarella, L.
spellingShingle Santarelli, L.
Lepidi, S.
Cafarella, L.
Propagation of low frequency geomagnetic field fluctuations in Antarctica: comparison between two polar cap stations
author_facet Santarelli, L.
Lepidi, S.
Cafarella, L.
author_sort Santarelli, L.
title Propagation of low frequency geomagnetic field fluctuations in Antarctica: comparison between two polar cap stations
title_short Propagation of low frequency geomagnetic field fluctuations in Antarctica: comparison between two polar cap stations
title_full Propagation of low frequency geomagnetic field fluctuations in Antarctica: comparison between two polar cap stations
title_fullStr Propagation of low frequency geomagnetic field fluctuations in Antarctica: comparison between two polar cap stations
title_full_unstemmed Propagation of low frequency geomagnetic field fluctuations in Antarctica: comparison between two polar cap stations
title_sort propagation of low frequency geomagnetic field fluctuations in antarctica: comparison between two polar cap stations
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-25-2405-2007
https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/25/2405/2007/
long_lat ENVELOPE(164.123,164.123,-74.695,-74.695)
ENVELOPE(164.117,164.117,-74.700,-74.700)
ENVELOPE(166.766,166.766,-77.849,-77.849)
geographic Antarctic
Mario Zucchelli
Mario Zucchelli Station
Scott Base
geographic_facet Antarctic
Mario Zucchelli
Mario Zucchelli Station
Scott Base
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
op_source eISSN: 1432-0576
op_relation doi:10.5194/angeo-25-2405-2007
https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/25/2405/2007/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-25-2405-2007
container_title Annales Geophysicae
container_volume 25
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2405
op_container_end_page 2412
_version_ 1766081489969086464