Ground-based validation of the MetopA and B GOME-2 OClO measurements

This paper reports on ground-based validation of the atmospheric OClO data record produced in the framework of EUMETSAT’s Satellite Application Facility on Atmospheric Chemistry Monitoring (AC SAF) using the GOME2-A and -B instruments over the 2007–2016 and 2013–2016 periods, respectively. OClO slan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pinardi, Gaia, Roozendael, Michel, Hendrick, François, Richter, Andreas, Valks, Pieter, Alwarda, Ramina, Bognar, Kristof, Frieß, Udo, Granville, José, Gu, Myojeong, Johnston, Paul, Prados-Roman, Cristina, Querel, Richard, Strong, Kimberly, Wagner, Thomas, Wittrock, Folkard, Yela Gonzalez, Margarita
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-356
https://amt.copernicus.org/preprints/amt-2021-356/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:amtd98682
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:amtd98682 2023-05-15T14:02:17+02:00 Ground-based validation of the MetopA and B GOME-2 OClO measurements Pinardi, Gaia Roozendael, Michel Hendrick, François Richter, Andreas Valks, Pieter Alwarda, Ramina Bognar, Kristof Frieß, Udo Granville, José Gu, Myojeong Johnston, Paul Prados-Roman, Cristina Querel, Richard Strong, Kimberly Wagner, Thomas Wittrock, Folkard Yela Gonzalez, Margarita 2021-11-29 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-356 https://amt.copernicus.org/preprints/amt-2021-356/ eng eng doi:10.5194/amt-2021-356 https://amt.copernicus.org/preprints/amt-2021-356/ eISSN: 1867-8548 Text 2021 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-356 2021-12-06T17:22:31Z This paper reports on ground-based validation of the atmospheric OClO data record produced in the framework of EUMETSAT’s Satellite Application Facility on Atmospheric Chemistry Monitoring (AC SAF) using the GOME2-A and -B instruments over the 2007–2016 and 2013–2016 periods, respectively. OClO slant column densities are compared to correlative measurements collected from 9 NDACC Zenith-Scattered-Light DOAS (ZSL-DOAS) instruments distributed in both the Arctic and Antarctic. Sensitivity tests are performed on the ground-based data to estimate the impact of the different OClO DOAS analysis settings. On this basis, we infer systematic uncertainties of about 25 % between the different ground-based data analysis, reaching total uncertainties ranging from about 26 % to 33 % for the different stations. Time-series at the different sites show good agreement between satellite and ground-based data, both for the inter-annual variability and the overall OClO seasonal behavior. GOME-2A results are found to be nosier than those of GOME-2B, especially after 2011, probably due to instrumental degradation effects. Daily linear regression analysis for OClO activated periods yield correlation coefficients of 0.8 for GOME-2A and 0.87 for GOME-2B, with slopes of 0.64 and 0.72, respectively. Biases are within 8 x 10 13 molec/cm 2 with some differences between GOME-2A and GOME-2B, depending on the station. Overall, considering all the stations, a median bias of about −2.2 x 10 13 molec/cm 2 is found for both GOME-2 instruments. Text Antarc* Antarctic Arctic Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Antarctic Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description This paper reports on ground-based validation of the atmospheric OClO data record produced in the framework of EUMETSAT’s Satellite Application Facility on Atmospheric Chemistry Monitoring (AC SAF) using the GOME2-A and -B instruments over the 2007–2016 and 2013–2016 periods, respectively. OClO slant column densities are compared to correlative measurements collected from 9 NDACC Zenith-Scattered-Light DOAS (ZSL-DOAS) instruments distributed in both the Arctic and Antarctic. Sensitivity tests are performed on the ground-based data to estimate the impact of the different OClO DOAS analysis settings. On this basis, we infer systematic uncertainties of about 25 % between the different ground-based data analysis, reaching total uncertainties ranging from about 26 % to 33 % for the different stations. Time-series at the different sites show good agreement between satellite and ground-based data, both for the inter-annual variability and the overall OClO seasonal behavior. GOME-2A results are found to be nosier than those of GOME-2B, especially after 2011, probably due to instrumental degradation effects. Daily linear regression analysis for OClO activated periods yield correlation coefficients of 0.8 for GOME-2A and 0.87 for GOME-2B, with slopes of 0.64 and 0.72, respectively. Biases are within 8 x 10 13 molec/cm 2 with some differences between GOME-2A and GOME-2B, depending on the station. Overall, considering all the stations, a median bias of about −2.2 x 10 13 molec/cm 2 is found for both GOME-2 instruments.
format Text
author Pinardi, Gaia
Roozendael, Michel
Hendrick, François
Richter, Andreas
Valks, Pieter
Alwarda, Ramina
Bognar, Kristof
Frieß, Udo
Granville, José
Gu, Myojeong
Johnston, Paul
Prados-Roman, Cristina
Querel, Richard
Strong, Kimberly
Wagner, Thomas
Wittrock, Folkard
Yela Gonzalez, Margarita
spellingShingle Pinardi, Gaia
Roozendael, Michel
Hendrick, François
Richter, Andreas
Valks, Pieter
Alwarda, Ramina
Bognar, Kristof
Frieß, Udo
Granville, José
Gu, Myojeong
Johnston, Paul
Prados-Roman, Cristina
Querel, Richard
Strong, Kimberly
Wagner, Thomas
Wittrock, Folkard
Yela Gonzalez, Margarita
Ground-based validation of the MetopA and B GOME-2 OClO measurements
author_facet Pinardi, Gaia
Roozendael, Michel
Hendrick, François
Richter, Andreas
Valks, Pieter
Alwarda, Ramina
Bognar, Kristof
Frieß, Udo
Granville, José
Gu, Myojeong
Johnston, Paul
Prados-Roman, Cristina
Querel, Richard
Strong, Kimberly
Wagner, Thomas
Wittrock, Folkard
Yela Gonzalez, Margarita
author_sort Pinardi, Gaia
title Ground-based validation of the MetopA and B GOME-2 OClO measurements
title_short Ground-based validation of the MetopA and B GOME-2 OClO measurements
title_full Ground-based validation of the MetopA and B GOME-2 OClO measurements
title_fullStr Ground-based validation of the MetopA and B GOME-2 OClO measurements
title_full_unstemmed Ground-based validation of the MetopA and B GOME-2 OClO measurements
title_sort ground-based validation of the metopa and b gome-2 oclo measurements
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-356
https://amt.copernicus.org/preprints/amt-2021-356/
geographic Antarctic
Arctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
Arctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic
op_source eISSN: 1867-8548
op_relation doi:10.5194/amt-2021-356
https://amt.copernicus.org/preprints/amt-2021-356/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-356
_version_ 1766272475377696768