Comparison of the Arctic upper-air temperatures from radiosonde and radio occultation observations

Air temperature is one of the most important parameters used for monitoring Arctic climate change. The Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate and Formosa Satellite mission 3 (COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3) radio occultation (RO) "wet" temperature product (i.e., "w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chang, Liang, Guo, Lixin, Feng, Guiping, Wu, Xuerui, Gao, Guoping
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2016-232
https://amt.copernicus.org/preprints/amt-2016-232/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:amtd53677
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:amtd53677 2023-05-15T14:36:27+02:00 Comparison of the Arctic upper-air temperatures from radiosonde and radio occultation observations Chang, Liang Guo, Lixin Feng, Guiping Wu, Xuerui Gao, Guoping 2018-08-10 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2016-232 https://amt.copernicus.org/preprints/amt-2016-232/ eng eng doi:10.5194/amt-2016-232 https://amt.copernicus.org/preprints/amt-2016-232/ eISSN: 1867-8548 Text 2018 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2016-232 2020-07-20T16:24:05Z Air temperature is one of the most important parameters used for monitoring Arctic climate change. The Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate and Formosa Satellite mission 3 (COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3) radio occultation (RO) "wet" temperature product (i.e., "wetPrf") was introduced to analyze the Arctic air temperature profiles at 925–200 hPa in 2007–2012. The "wet" temperatures were further compared with radiosonde (RS) observations. Results from the spatially and temporally synchronized RS and COSMIC observations showed that their temperatures were matched well with each other, especially at 400 hPa. Comparisons of seasonal temperatures and anomalies from COSMIC and homogenized RS observations suggested the limited number of COSMIC observations during the spatial matchup may be insufficient to describe the small-scale spatial structure of temperature variations. Furthermore, comparisons of seasonal temperature anomalies from RS and 5 × 5 degree gridded COSMIC observations at 400 hPa during the sea ice minimum (SIM) of 2007 and 2012 were also made. Results revealed that the widely covered COSMIC observations can provide more details than RS observations in describing the Arctic temperature variations. Therefore, despite COSMIC observations being unsuitable to describe the Arctic temperatures in the lowest level, they provide a complementary data source to study the Arctic upper-air temperature variations and related climate change. Text Arctic Climate change Sea ice Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description Air temperature is one of the most important parameters used for monitoring Arctic climate change. The Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate and Formosa Satellite mission 3 (COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3) radio occultation (RO) "wet" temperature product (i.e., "wetPrf") was introduced to analyze the Arctic air temperature profiles at 925–200 hPa in 2007–2012. The "wet" temperatures were further compared with radiosonde (RS) observations. Results from the spatially and temporally synchronized RS and COSMIC observations showed that their temperatures were matched well with each other, especially at 400 hPa. Comparisons of seasonal temperatures and anomalies from COSMIC and homogenized RS observations suggested the limited number of COSMIC observations during the spatial matchup may be insufficient to describe the small-scale spatial structure of temperature variations. Furthermore, comparisons of seasonal temperature anomalies from RS and 5 × 5 degree gridded COSMIC observations at 400 hPa during the sea ice minimum (SIM) of 2007 and 2012 were also made. Results revealed that the widely covered COSMIC observations can provide more details than RS observations in describing the Arctic temperature variations. Therefore, despite COSMIC observations being unsuitable to describe the Arctic temperatures in the lowest level, they provide a complementary data source to study the Arctic upper-air temperature variations and related climate change.
format Text
author Chang, Liang
Guo, Lixin
Feng, Guiping
Wu, Xuerui
Gao, Guoping
spellingShingle Chang, Liang
Guo, Lixin
Feng, Guiping
Wu, Xuerui
Gao, Guoping
Comparison of the Arctic upper-air temperatures from radiosonde and radio occultation observations
author_facet Chang, Liang
Guo, Lixin
Feng, Guiping
Wu, Xuerui
Gao, Guoping
author_sort Chang, Liang
title Comparison of the Arctic upper-air temperatures from radiosonde and radio occultation observations
title_short Comparison of the Arctic upper-air temperatures from radiosonde and radio occultation observations
title_full Comparison of the Arctic upper-air temperatures from radiosonde and radio occultation observations
title_fullStr Comparison of the Arctic upper-air temperatures from radiosonde and radio occultation observations
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Arctic upper-air temperatures from radiosonde and radio occultation observations
title_sort comparison of the arctic upper-air temperatures from radiosonde and radio occultation observations
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2016-232
https://amt.copernicus.org/preprints/amt-2016-232/
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Climate change
Sea ice
genre_facet Arctic
Climate change
Sea ice
op_source eISSN: 1867-8548
op_relation doi:10.5194/amt-2016-232
https://amt.copernicus.org/preprints/amt-2016-232/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2016-232
_version_ 1766309062891274240