Future TRFs and GGOS – where to put the next SLR station?

Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) is one of the four geodetic space techniques contributing to the realisation of terrestrial reference frames (TRFs) as well as to the determination of Earth Rotation Parameters (ERPs). The current SLR tracking network suffers from an insufficient network geometry due to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Advances in Geosciences
Main Authors: Kehm, Alexander, Bloßfeld, Mathis, König, Peter, Seitz, Florian
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-50-17-2019
https://adgeo.copernicus.org/articles/50/17/2019/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:adgeo76738
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:adgeo76738 2023-05-15T13:55:28+02:00 Future TRFs and GGOS – where to put the next SLR station? Kehm, Alexander Bloßfeld, Mathis König, Peter Seitz, Florian 2019-11-05 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-50-17-2019 https://adgeo.copernicus.org/articles/50/17/2019/ eng eng doi:10.5194/adgeo-50-17-2019 https://adgeo.copernicus.org/articles/50/17/2019/ eISSN: 1680-7359 Text 2019 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-50-17-2019 2020-07-20T16:22:35Z Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) is one of the four geodetic space techniques contributing to the realisation of terrestrial reference frames (TRFs) as well as to the determination of Earth Rotation Parameters (ERPs). The current SLR tracking network suffers from an insufficient network geometry due to a lack of stations especially in the southern hemisphere. Previous simulation studies have shown that the extension of the global SLR tracking network is indispensable for reaching the target accuracy of future TRFs according to user requests and the ambitious goals of the Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS). The simulation study presented here puts the focus on a determination of the locations where additional SLR stations are most valuable for an improved estimation of the geodetic parameters. Within the present study, we perform a simulation of a set of stations distributed homogeneously over the globe and compare different solutions, always adding one of these simulated stations to the real SLR station network. This approach has been chosen in order to be able to investigate the deficiencies of the existing SLR network and to judge in which regions on the globe an additional SLR station would be most valuable for the improvement of certain geodetic parameters of SLR-derived reference frames. It is shown that the optimum location of a future SLR station depends on the parameter of interest. In case of the ERPs, the main potential for improvement by a single additional station can be shown for locations in polar regions (improvement for y pole up to 7 %) and for locations along the equator for the lengh of day (LOD, improvement up to 1.5 %). The TRF parameters would benefit from an additional station around the pierce points of the axes of the terrestrial reference frame (improvement for t y up to 4 %), the Arctic and the Pacific Ocean region ( t z improved by up to 4.5 %), and the Antarctic and the Indian Ocean region (scale improved by up to 2.2 %). As outcome of this study, it is concluded that an additional SLR site in the Antarctic region might be of first priority, enabling improvements in the pole coordinates and the scale of the TRF; potential further sites are recommended in the equatorial region, especially beneficial for the origin of the realised TRF as well as for LOD. Text Antarc* Antarctic Arctic Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Antarctic Arctic Indian Pacific The Antarctic Advances in Geosciences 50 17 25
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) is one of the four geodetic space techniques contributing to the realisation of terrestrial reference frames (TRFs) as well as to the determination of Earth Rotation Parameters (ERPs). The current SLR tracking network suffers from an insufficient network geometry due to a lack of stations especially in the southern hemisphere. Previous simulation studies have shown that the extension of the global SLR tracking network is indispensable for reaching the target accuracy of future TRFs according to user requests and the ambitious goals of the Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS). The simulation study presented here puts the focus on a determination of the locations where additional SLR stations are most valuable for an improved estimation of the geodetic parameters. Within the present study, we perform a simulation of a set of stations distributed homogeneously over the globe and compare different solutions, always adding one of these simulated stations to the real SLR station network. This approach has been chosen in order to be able to investigate the deficiencies of the existing SLR network and to judge in which regions on the globe an additional SLR station would be most valuable for the improvement of certain geodetic parameters of SLR-derived reference frames. It is shown that the optimum location of a future SLR station depends on the parameter of interest. In case of the ERPs, the main potential for improvement by a single additional station can be shown for locations in polar regions (improvement for y pole up to 7 %) and for locations along the equator for the lengh of day (LOD, improvement up to 1.5 %). The TRF parameters would benefit from an additional station around the pierce points of the axes of the terrestrial reference frame (improvement for t y up to 4 %), the Arctic and the Pacific Ocean region ( t z improved by up to 4.5 %), and the Antarctic and the Indian Ocean region (scale improved by up to 2.2 %). As outcome of this study, it is concluded that an additional SLR site in the Antarctic region might be of first priority, enabling improvements in the pole coordinates and the scale of the TRF; potential further sites are recommended in the equatorial region, especially beneficial for the origin of the realised TRF as well as for LOD.
format Text
author Kehm, Alexander
Bloßfeld, Mathis
König, Peter
Seitz, Florian
spellingShingle Kehm, Alexander
Bloßfeld, Mathis
König, Peter
Seitz, Florian
Future TRFs and GGOS – where to put the next SLR station?
author_facet Kehm, Alexander
Bloßfeld, Mathis
König, Peter
Seitz, Florian
author_sort Kehm, Alexander
title Future TRFs and GGOS – where to put the next SLR station?
title_short Future TRFs and GGOS – where to put the next SLR station?
title_full Future TRFs and GGOS – where to put the next SLR station?
title_fullStr Future TRFs and GGOS – where to put the next SLR station?
title_full_unstemmed Future TRFs and GGOS – where to put the next SLR station?
title_sort future trfs and ggos – where to put the next slr station?
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-50-17-2019
https://adgeo.copernicus.org/articles/50/17/2019/
geographic Antarctic
Arctic
Indian
Pacific
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
Arctic
Indian
Pacific
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic
op_source eISSN: 1680-7359
op_relation doi:10.5194/adgeo-50-17-2019
https://adgeo.copernicus.org/articles/50/17/2019/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-50-17-2019
container_title Advances in Geosciences
container_volume 50
container_start_page 17
op_container_end_page 25
_version_ 1766262107138949120