Present-day radiative effect from radiation-absorbing aerosols in snow

Black carbon (BC), brown carbon (BrC) and soil dust are the most radiation absorbing aerosols (RAA). When RAA are deposited on the snowpack, they lower the snow albedo, increasing the absorption of the solar radiation. The climatic impact associated to snow darkening induced by RAA is highly uncerta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tuccella, Paolo, Pitari, Giovanni, Colaiuda, Valentina, Curci, Gabriele
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Raa
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-585
https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/acp-2020-585/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:acpd86264
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:acpd86264 2023-05-15T13:11:58+02:00 Present-day radiative effect from radiation-absorbing aerosols in snow Tuccella, Paolo Pitari, Giovanni Colaiuda, Valentina Curci, Gabriele 2020-08-13 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-585 https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/acp-2020-585/ eng eng doi:10.5194/acp-2020-585 https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/acp-2020-585/ eISSN: 1680-7324 Text 2020 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-585 2020-08-17T16:22:13Z Black carbon (BC), brown carbon (BrC) and soil dust are the most radiation absorbing aerosols (RAA). When RAA are deposited on the snowpack, they lower the snow albedo, increasing the absorption of the solar radiation. The climatic impact associated to snow darkening induced by RAA is highly uncertain. In this work, a 5-years simulation with GEOS-Chem global chemistry and transport model was performed, in order to calculate the present-day radiative forcing (RF) of RAA in snow. RF was estimated taking simultaneously into account the presence of BC, BrC, and mineral soil dust in snow. Modelled BC and black carbon equivalent (BCE) mixing ratios in snow and the fraction of light absorption due to non-BC compounds (f non-BC ) were compared with worldwide observations. We showed as BC, BCE and f non-BC , obtained from deposition and precipitation fluxes, reproduce the regional variability and order of magnitude of the observations. Global mean all sky total RAA, BC, BrC and dust snow RF are 0.068, 0.033, 0.0066, and 0.012 W/m 2 , respectively. At global scale, non-BC compounds account for 40 % of RAA snow RF, while anthropogenic RAAs contribute to the forcing for 56 %. With regard to non-BC compounds, the largest impact of BrC has been found during summer in the Arctic (+0.13 W/m 2 ). In the middle latitudes of Asia, dust forcing in spring accounts for the 50 % (+0.24 W/m 2 ) of the total RAAs RF. Uncertainties in absorbing optical properties, RAA mixing ratio in snow, snow grain dimension, and snow cover fraction result in an overall uncertainty of −50% / +61 %, −57 % / +183 %, −63 % / +112 %, and −49 % / +77 % in BC, BrC, dust and total RAAs snow RF, respectively. Text albedo Arctic black carbon Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Arctic Raa ENVELOPE(14.933,14.933,68.583,68.583)
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description Black carbon (BC), brown carbon (BrC) and soil dust are the most radiation absorbing aerosols (RAA). When RAA are deposited on the snowpack, they lower the snow albedo, increasing the absorption of the solar radiation. The climatic impact associated to snow darkening induced by RAA is highly uncertain. In this work, a 5-years simulation with GEOS-Chem global chemistry and transport model was performed, in order to calculate the present-day radiative forcing (RF) of RAA in snow. RF was estimated taking simultaneously into account the presence of BC, BrC, and mineral soil dust in snow. Modelled BC and black carbon equivalent (BCE) mixing ratios in snow and the fraction of light absorption due to non-BC compounds (f non-BC ) were compared with worldwide observations. We showed as BC, BCE and f non-BC , obtained from deposition and precipitation fluxes, reproduce the regional variability and order of magnitude of the observations. Global mean all sky total RAA, BC, BrC and dust snow RF are 0.068, 0.033, 0.0066, and 0.012 W/m 2 , respectively. At global scale, non-BC compounds account for 40 % of RAA snow RF, while anthropogenic RAAs contribute to the forcing for 56 %. With regard to non-BC compounds, the largest impact of BrC has been found during summer in the Arctic (+0.13 W/m 2 ). In the middle latitudes of Asia, dust forcing in spring accounts for the 50 % (+0.24 W/m 2 ) of the total RAAs RF. Uncertainties in absorbing optical properties, RAA mixing ratio in snow, snow grain dimension, and snow cover fraction result in an overall uncertainty of −50% / +61 %, −57 % / +183 %, −63 % / +112 %, and −49 % / +77 % in BC, BrC, dust and total RAAs snow RF, respectively.
format Text
author Tuccella, Paolo
Pitari, Giovanni
Colaiuda, Valentina
Curci, Gabriele
spellingShingle Tuccella, Paolo
Pitari, Giovanni
Colaiuda, Valentina
Curci, Gabriele
Present-day radiative effect from radiation-absorbing aerosols in snow
author_facet Tuccella, Paolo
Pitari, Giovanni
Colaiuda, Valentina
Curci, Gabriele
author_sort Tuccella, Paolo
title Present-day radiative effect from radiation-absorbing aerosols in snow
title_short Present-day radiative effect from radiation-absorbing aerosols in snow
title_full Present-day radiative effect from radiation-absorbing aerosols in snow
title_fullStr Present-day radiative effect from radiation-absorbing aerosols in snow
title_full_unstemmed Present-day radiative effect from radiation-absorbing aerosols in snow
title_sort present-day radiative effect from radiation-absorbing aerosols in snow
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-585
https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/acp-2020-585/
long_lat ENVELOPE(14.933,14.933,68.583,68.583)
geographic Arctic
Raa
geographic_facet Arctic
Raa
genre albedo
Arctic
black carbon
genre_facet albedo
Arctic
black carbon
op_source eISSN: 1680-7324
op_relation doi:10.5194/acp-2020-585
https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/acp-2020-585/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-585
_version_ 1766249770666426368