Impacts of three types of solar geoengineering on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation

Climate models simulate lower rates of North Atlantic heat transport under greenhouse gas climates than at present due to a reduction in the strength of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). Solar geoengineering whereby surface temperatures are cooled by reduction of incoming short...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Main Authors: Xie, Mengdie, Moore, John C., Zhao, Liyun, Wolovick, Michael, Muri, Helene
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4581-2022
https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/4581/2022/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:acp98604
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:acp98604 2023-05-15T15:06:41+02:00 Impacts of three types of solar geoengineering on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation Xie, Mengdie Moore, John C. Zhao, Liyun Wolovick, Michael Muri, Helene 2022-04-08 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4581-2022 https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/4581/2022/ eng eng doi:10.5194/acp-22-4581-2022 https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/4581/2022/ eISSN: 1680-7324 Text 2022 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4581-2022 2022-04-11T16:22:17Z Climate models simulate lower rates of North Atlantic heat transport under greenhouse gas climates than at present due to a reduction in the strength of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). Solar geoengineering whereby surface temperatures are cooled by reduction of incoming shortwave radiation may be expected to ameliorate this effect. We investigate this using six Earth system models running scenarios from GeoMIP (Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project) in the cases of (i) reduction in the solar constant, mimicking dimming of the sun; (ii) sulfate aerosol injection into the lower equatorial stratosphere; and (iii) brightening of the ocean regions, mimicking enhancing tropospheric cloud amounts. We find that despite across-model differences, AMOC decreases are attributable to reduced air–ocean temperature differences and reduced September Arctic sea ice extent, with no significant impact from changing surface winds or precipitation − evaporation. Reversing the surface freshening of the North Atlantic overturning regions caused by decreased summer sea ice sea helps to promote AMOC. When comparing the geoengineering types after normalizing them for the differences in top-of-atmosphere radiative forcing, we find that solar dimming is more effective than either marine cloud brightening or stratospheric aerosol injection. Text Arctic North Atlantic Sea ice Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Arctic Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 22 7 4581 4597
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description Climate models simulate lower rates of North Atlantic heat transport under greenhouse gas climates than at present due to a reduction in the strength of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). Solar geoengineering whereby surface temperatures are cooled by reduction of incoming shortwave radiation may be expected to ameliorate this effect. We investigate this using six Earth system models running scenarios from GeoMIP (Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project) in the cases of (i) reduction in the solar constant, mimicking dimming of the sun; (ii) sulfate aerosol injection into the lower equatorial stratosphere; and (iii) brightening of the ocean regions, mimicking enhancing tropospheric cloud amounts. We find that despite across-model differences, AMOC decreases are attributable to reduced air–ocean temperature differences and reduced September Arctic sea ice extent, with no significant impact from changing surface winds or precipitation − evaporation. Reversing the surface freshening of the North Atlantic overturning regions caused by decreased summer sea ice sea helps to promote AMOC. When comparing the geoengineering types after normalizing them for the differences in top-of-atmosphere radiative forcing, we find that solar dimming is more effective than either marine cloud brightening or stratospheric aerosol injection.
format Text
author Xie, Mengdie
Moore, John C.
Zhao, Liyun
Wolovick, Michael
Muri, Helene
spellingShingle Xie, Mengdie
Moore, John C.
Zhao, Liyun
Wolovick, Michael
Muri, Helene
Impacts of three types of solar geoengineering on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation
author_facet Xie, Mengdie
Moore, John C.
Zhao, Liyun
Wolovick, Michael
Muri, Helene
author_sort Xie, Mengdie
title Impacts of three types of solar geoengineering on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation
title_short Impacts of three types of solar geoengineering on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation
title_full Impacts of three types of solar geoengineering on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation
title_fullStr Impacts of three types of solar geoengineering on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation
title_full_unstemmed Impacts of three types of solar geoengineering on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation
title_sort impacts of three types of solar geoengineering on the atlantic meridional overturning circulation
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4581-2022
https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/4581/2022/
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
North Atlantic
Sea ice
genre_facet Arctic
North Atlantic
Sea ice
op_source eISSN: 1680-7324
op_relation doi:10.5194/acp-22-4581-2022
https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/4581/2022/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4581-2022
container_title Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
container_volume 22
container_issue 7
container_start_page 4581
op_container_end_page 4597
_version_ 1766338246975946752