Seasonal cycle, size dependencies, and source analyses of aerosol optical properties at the SMEAR II measurement station in Hyytiälä, Finland
Scattering and absorption were measured at the Station for Measuring Ecosystem–Atmosphere Relations (SMEAR II) station in Hyytiälä, Finland, from October 2006 to May 2009. The average scattering coefficient σ SP (λ = 550 nm) 18 Mm −1 was about twice as much as at the Pallas Global Atmosphere Watch (...
Published in: | Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4445-2011 https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/4445/2011/ |
id |
ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:acp9617 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:acp9617 2023-05-15T17:47:09+02:00 Seasonal cycle, size dependencies, and source analyses of aerosol optical properties at the SMEAR II measurement station in Hyytiälä, Finland Virkkula, A. Backman, J. Aalto, P. P. Hulkkonen, M. Riuttanen, L. Nieminen, T. Maso, M. Sogacheva, L. Leeuw, G. Kulmala, M. 2018-01-15 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4445-2011 https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/4445/2011/ eng eng doi:10.5194/acp-11-4445-2011 https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/4445/2011/ eISSN: 1680-7324 Text 2018 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4445-2011 2019-12-24T09:56:53Z Scattering and absorption were measured at the Station for Measuring Ecosystem–Atmosphere Relations (SMEAR II) station in Hyytiälä, Finland, from October 2006 to May 2009. The average scattering coefficient σ SP (λ = 550 nm) 18 Mm −1 was about twice as much as at the Pallas Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) station in Finnish Lapland. The average absorption coefficient σ AP (λ = 550 nm) was 2.1 Mm −1 . The seasonal cycles were analyzed from hourly-averaged data classified according to the measurement month. The ratio of the highest to the lowest average σ SP and σ AP was ~1.8 and ~2.8, respectively. The average single-scattering albedo (ω 0 ) was 0.86 in winter and 0.91 in summer. σ SP was highly correlated with the volume concentrations calculated from number size distributions in the size range 0.003–10 μm. Assuming that the particle density was 1.5 g cm −3 , the PM 10 mass scattering efficiency was 3.1 ± 0.9 g m −2 at λ = 550 nm. Scattering coefficients were also calculated from the number size distributions by using a Mie code and the refractive index of ammonium sulfate. The linear regression yielded σ SP (modelled) = 1.046 × σ SP (measured) for the data with the low nephelometer sample volume relative humidity (RH NEPH = 30 ± 9 %) and σ SP (modelled) = 0.985 × σ SP (measured) when RH NEPH = 55 ± 4 %. The effective complex refractive index was obtained by an iterative approach, by matching the measured and the modelled σ SP and σ AP . The average effective complex refractive index was (1.517 ± 0.057) + (0.019 ± 0.015) i at λ = 550 nm. The iterated imaginary part had a strong seasonal cycle, with smallest values in summer and highest in winter. The contribution of submicron particles to scattering was ~90 %. The Ångström exponent of scattering, σ SP , was compared with the following weighted mean diameters: count mean diameter (CMD), surface mean diameter (SMD), scattering mean diameter (ScMD), condensation sink mean diameter (CsMD), and volume mean diameter (VMD). If α SP is to be used for estimating some measure of the size of particles, the best choice would be ScMD, then SMD, and then VMD. In all of these the qualitative relationship is similar: the larger the Ångström exponent, the smaller the weighted mean diameter. Contrary to these, CMD increased with increasing α SP and CsMD did not have any clear relationship with α SP . Source regions were estimated with backtrajectories and trajectory statistics. The geometric mean σ SP and σ AP associated with the grid cells in Eastern Europe were in the range 20–40 Mm −1 and 4–6 Mm −1 , respectively. The respective geometric means of σ SP and σ AP in the grid cells over Norwegian Sea were in the range 5–10 Mm −1 and <1 Mm −1 . The source areas associated with high α SP values were norther than those for σ SP and σ AP . The trajectory statistical approach and a simple wind sector classification agreed well. Text Norwegian Sea Lapland Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Norwegian Sea Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 11 9 4445 4468 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Copernicus Publications: E-Journals |
op_collection_id |
ftcopernicus |
language |
English |
description |
Scattering and absorption were measured at the Station for Measuring Ecosystem–Atmosphere Relations (SMEAR II) station in Hyytiälä, Finland, from October 2006 to May 2009. The average scattering coefficient σ SP (λ = 550 nm) 18 Mm −1 was about twice as much as at the Pallas Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) station in Finnish Lapland. The average absorption coefficient σ AP (λ = 550 nm) was 2.1 Mm −1 . The seasonal cycles were analyzed from hourly-averaged data classified according to the measurement month. The ratio of the highest to the lowest average σ SP and σ AP was ~1.8 and ~2.8, respectively. The average single-scattering albedo (ω 0 ) was 0.86 in winter and 0.91 in summer. σ SP was highly correlated with the volume concentrations calculated from number size distributions in the size range 0.003–10 μm. Assuming that the particle density was 1.5 g cm −3 , the PM 10 mass scattering efficiency was 3.1 ± 0.9 g m −2 at λ = 550 nm. Scattering coefficients were also calculated from the number size distributions by using a Mie code and the refractive index of ammonium sulfate. The linear regression yielded σ SP (modelled) = 1.046 × σ SP (measured) for the data with the low nephelometer sample volume relative humidity (RH NEPH = 30 ± 9 %) and σ SP (modelled) = 0.985 × σ SP (measured) when RH NEPH = 55 ± 4 %. The effective complex refractive index was obtained by an iterative approach, by matching the measured and the modelled σ SP and σ AP . The average effective complex refractive index was (1.517 ± 0.057) + (0.019 ± 0.015) i at λ = 550 nm. The iterated imaginary part had a strong seasonal cycle, with smallest values in summer and highest in winter. The contribution of submicron particles to scattering was ~90 %. The Ångström exponent of scattering, σ SP , was compared with the following weighted mean diameters: count mean diameter (CMD), surface mean diameter (SMD), scattering mean diameter (ScMD), condensation sink mean diameter (CsMD), and volume mean diameter (VMD). If α SP is to be used for estimating some measure of the size of particles, the best choice would be ScMD, then SMD, and then VMD. In all of these the qualitative relationship is similar: the larger the Ångström exponent, the smaller the weighted mean diameter. Contrary to these, CMD increased with increasing α SP and CsMD did not have any clear relationship with α SP . Source regions were estimated with backtrajectories and trajectory statistics. The geometric mean σ SP and σ AP associated with the grid cells in Eastern Europe were in the range 20–40 Mm −1 and 4–6 Mm −1 , respectively. The respective geometric means of σ SP and σ AP in the grid cells over Norwegian Sea were in the range 5–10 Mm −1 and <1 Mm −1 . The source areas associated with high α SP values were norther than those for σ SP and σ AP . The trajectory statistical approach and a simple wind sector classification agreed well. |
format |
Text |
author |
Virkkula, A. Backman, J. Aalto, P. P. Hulkkonen, M. Riuttanen, L. Nieminen, T. Maso, M. Sogacheva, L. Leeuw, G. Kulmala, M. |
spellingShingle |
Virkkula, A. Backman, J. Aalto, P. P. Hulkkonen, M. Riuttanen, L. Nieminen, T. Maso, M. Sogacheva, L. Leeuw, G. Kulmala, M. Seasonal cycle, size dependencies, and source analyses of aerosol optical properties at the SMEAR II measurement station in Hyytiälä, Finland |
author_facet |
Virkkula, A. Backman, J. Aalto, P. P. Hulkkonen, M. Riuttanen, L. Nieminen, T. Maso, M. Sogacheva, L. Leeuw, G. Kulmala, M. |
author_sort |
Virkkula, A. |
title |
Seasonal cycle, size dependencies, and source analyses of aerosol optical properties at the SMEAR II measurement station in Hyytiälä, Finland |
title_short |
Seasonal cycle, size dependencies, and source analyses of aerosol optical properties at the SMEAR II measurement station in Hyytiälä, Finland |
title_full |
Seasonal cycle, size dependencies, and source analyses of aerosol optical properties at the SMEAR II measurement station in Hyytiälä, Finland |
title_fullStr |
Seasonal cycle, size dependencies, and source analyses of aerosol optical properties at the SMEAR II measurement station in Hyytiälä, Finland |
title_full_unstemmed |
Seasonal cycle, size dependencies, and source analyses of aerosol optical properties at the SMEAR II measurement station in Hyytiälä, Finland |
title_sort |
seasonal cycle, size dependencies, and source analyses of aerosol optical properties at the smear ii measurement station in hyytiälä, finland |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4445-2011 https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/4445/2011/ |
geographic |
Norwegian Sea |
geographic_facet |
Norwegian Sea |
genre |
Norwegian Sea Lapland |
genre_facet |
Norwegian Sea Lapland |
op_source |
eISSN: 1680-7324 |
op_relation |
doi:10.5194/acp-11-4445-2011 https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/4445/2011/ |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4445-2011 |
container_title |
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
container_volume |
11 |
container_issue |
9 |
container_start_page |
4445 |
op_container_end_page |
4468 |
_version_ |
1766151500725223424 |